Session Profile: Martin Helme
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
2024-01-25
Political Position
The political position is focused on a specific draft bill, which is assessed as moderately positive ("good"). The primary focus is on political risk analysis and the consequences that will arise if the legislative amendments are not implemented, which indicates a policy-driven approach.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker expresses interest in legislative risk analysis and political assessment, emphasizing the need to understand the consequences of maintaining the status quo. The specific area that the draft bill focuses on remains unmentioned.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is analytical and interrogative, centering on logical risk assessment. The speaker presents their viewpoint (the draft bill is good) and subsequently directs attention to a critical question, all while maintaining a formal and professional tone.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The dataset indicates one instance of participation in the plenary session, specifically in the form of asking a question. Insufficient data for evaluating patterns.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The speech contains no criticism and does not identify opponents, focusing instead on the substantive evaluation of the draft bill. Insufficient data.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The speaker demonstrates a willingness to cooperate by supporting the content of the bill and referencing their agreement with the previous question ("the same question"), which suggests a constructive approach to the legislative process.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
Insufficient data.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Insufficient data
1 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Insufficient data
1 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is on supporting the specific bill and assessing the risks associated with it. The speaker acts as both a supporter and an assessor of the bill, seeking clarification regarding the potential consequences of leaving it unchanged.
1 Speeches Analyzed