Agenda Profile: Martin Helme
Draft law amending the Securities Market Act and, in consequence thereof, amending other laws (588 SE) - first reading
2025-04-08
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Political Position
The political stance is strongly opposed to the draft bill concerning the establishment of quotas for the underrepresented sex in governing bodies. This position is value-driven and critical, focusing on the sheer absurdity of implementing such a policy, especially considering contemporary definitions of gender. The speaker criticizes the government's actions for "engaging in nonsense."
2 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates detailed knowledge of the sanctions within the bill, specifically citing Paragraph 2379[2] and the associated fines (up to 300 penalty units or 400,000 euros). They are also fully aware of the positions held by government members and the education system regarding gender issues, referencing 8th-grade textbooks and the scientific consensus on 20 genders.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is highly combative, sarcastic, and blunt. It includes direct accusations of lying ("Don't lie") and berating the questioners. Hyperbole ("I get 800%") and emotional appeals are employed to stress the absurdity of the proposed bill, even while grounding the argument in specific legal details.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker actively participates in the legislative debate (first reading of Bill 588 SE), posing questions and objections directly to the bill's presenter ("Jürgen"). This pattern indicates active participation in plenary sessions, focusing on government accountability and procedures.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The main opponents are the bill’s initiator ("Jürgen") and members of the governing coalition (Kristina Kallas, Reili Rand). The criticism is intense, focusing both on the substance of the policy (quotas, categorization) and on procedural and personal aspects (lying, failure to answer questions). No willingness to compromise is evident.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
There is not enough data.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
Insufficient data.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Insufficient data.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
The speaker is vehemently opposed to implementing gender quotas and mocks contemporary gender definitions, referring ironically to "at least 20 different genders." He stresses that gender is "in people's heads," not in their pants, while criticizing the bill's classification system.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The primary legislative focus is opposing the draft amendment to the Securities Market Act (Bill 588 SE), particularly the provisions concerning the establishment of quotas for the underrepresented sex. The speaker is acting as a strong opponent, challenging both the substance and the legal specifics (sanctions).
2 Speeches Analyzed