Agenda Profile: Martin Helme
National Heritage Fund and Raw Materials Supply Security Partnership
2025-03-12
The 15th Riigikogu, fifth sitting, information briefing.
Political Position
The political stance is strongly oppositional and fiercely critical, focusing on the government's incompetence, lack of integrity, and corruption. The main topics include the management of national resources, security policy (specifically, the unreliability of the NATO guarantee), and foreign policy (relations with the USA)—all of which the speaker declares bankrupt. This position forcefully offers alternatives and demands open democratic debate.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker exhibits expertise in the intricacies of foreign and security policy, referencing the suspension and subsequent reinstatement of US military aid, as well as the repercussions stemming from the Trump administration’s criticism. Furthermore, the speaker demonstrated knowledge regarding the management of sovereign wealth funds and natural resources, citing the Norwegian oil fund for comparison and criticizing the distribution of 2.6 billion.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is highly combative, accusatory, and sharp, employing strong emotional and negative expressions (e.g., "the corrupt Estonian clique," "the political line is bankrupt"). The appeal itself is primarily politically charged, focusing on leveling accusations against the government and demanding answers regarding specific diplomatic steps (e.g., following Latvia's example).
1 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
Not enough data.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The main opponent is the ruling "corrupt Estonian clique" and high-ranking government politicians, including Marko Mihkelson and Finance Minister Ligi. The criticism is intense, accusing them of corruption, the selling off of natural resources, and foreign policy failures. The chastising of the Trump administration, which has damaged relations, is particularly strongly criticized.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The speaker stresses the need for open democratic debate and the presentation of alternatives, even on foreign policy issues. There are no references to cooperation with the government or cross-party initiatives; the focus is on challenging the government's actions.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is on national issues (Estonian government, natural resources, security) and international topics, especially relations with the United States and the credibility of NATO guarantees. For comparison, the Norwegian oil fund and the diplomatic efforts of the Latvian Ministry of Foreign Affairs are cited. Specific local or regional problems are absent.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
The economic views focus on protecting national wealth and natural resources, standing firmly against their sell-off and corrupt distribution. There is criticism regarding the allocation of 2.6 billion to the "wind turbine guys." In principle, the creation of a sovereign wealth fund, following Norway's example, is supported, but it is stressed that the current government cannot be trusted to manage it.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Not enough data.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is aimed at changing the government's political direction and diplomatic strategy, particularly concerning the improvement of relations with the USA. There is a demand for concrete action, citing Latvia's example of establishing a dedicated team to strengthen ties with the Trump administration. Specific draft legislation or proposed amendments are currently lacking.
1 Speeches Analyzed