Session Profile: Mart Helme

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

2025-01-27

Political Position
The political stance is strongly value-driven, focusing on opposition to ideological dictatorship, censorship, and pressure within the Republic of Estonia. The speaker takes a stand against the government's attempt to dictate "scientifically justified" positions, viewing this as a threat to constitutional institutions. This position is intensely adversarial and performance-driven, emphasizing the government's dishonesty and ideological bias.

1 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates knowledge of historical ideological and scientific movements by drawing parallels with the scientific justification of communism, Lysenkoism, and Michurinism. This historical understanding is employed to support a critique of the current situation, highlighting the dangers of ideological pressure.

1 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is highly confrontational, emotional, and accusatory, beginning by justifying the right to protest and interrupt. Strong and derogatory expressions are used (e.g., "a kindergarten," "silly fools," "rubbish") alongside historical parallels to Communism and Lysenkoism to discredit the opposing side. The speech concludes with a cautionary rhetorical question, "When will you change your fur?", referencing events in America.

1 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The pattern of behavior involves protesting and heckling during the plenary session, which indicates a readiness to use direct and disruptive methods for expressing dissent. The speech was delivered in response to the minister's previous address, highlighting a reactive and critical role.

1 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The main opponents are the minister and, more broadly, the entire system of constitutional institutions, including the President and the Supreme Court, who are accused of complicity in an ideological dictatorship. The criticism is intense, ideological, and fundamental, accusing the opposing side of imposing censorship and pressure on society. Compromise is ruled out because the opposing side is considered to be talking "bullshit."

1 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The style of collaboration is purely confrontational and antagonistic. There is no reference to cooperation, willingness to compromise, or cross-party activity, with the focus remaining solely on protest and accusations.

1 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is directed at the national level, addressing the ideological situation in the Republic of Estonia as a whole and its impact on constitutional institutions. The international context is also mentioned, with reference to events in America, but local or regional focus is missing.

1 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Insufficient data

1 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
The social issue being addressed is tied to civil liberties and freedom of thought, standing in opposition to state-imposed ideological censorship and pressure. The speaker emphasizes the need to resist the government's attempts to dictate the correct viewpoints to society.

1 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
Insufficient data.

1 Speeches Analyzed