Session Profile: Mart Helme
XV Riigikogu, V Session, Plenary Sitting
2025-06-16
Political Position
The political position is strongly opposed to the environmental bill under discussion concerning waste sorting, going so far as to label it "eco-fascist." Although the speaker personally sorts waste, he emphasizes the necessity of differentiating obligations based on population groups and living environments (e.g., urban apartment dwellers versus rural residents). This stance is directed against the over-regulation of policy that fails to account for specific circumstances, and it is fundamentally value-based.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates knowledge of historical waste disposal methods and sanitation practices, citing examples from childhood (e.g., communal waste bins, dry toilets, the Sanepid station). The analysis focuses on practical examples and personal experience, contrasting waste generation in rural versus urban environments. There are no references to technical data or statistics.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The speaking style is provocative and combative, utilizing strong emotional terms such as "ecofascist bill." Historical comparisons and anecdotes are used (burying trash 70 years ago, dry toilets) to downplay the crisis situation and support the argument that the planet has managed fine in the past. The appeal is rather logical (by taking specific circumstances into account) and emotional (by opposing over-regulation), employing simple and contrasting examples (Lasnamäe versus the little old lady on the edge of the forest).
4 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker was active during the plenary session on June 16, 2025, presenting both an extended statement of position and several short interpellations or demands for the withdrawal and differentiation of the draft bill.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The confrontation is aimed at the drafters of the bill, who are being criticized for a rigid and unjust approach that fails to take into account the specific characteristics of the residents. The criticism is intense and politically driven, demanding the withdrawal of the bill and the introduction of differentiation, which rules out any compromise with the current form of the legislation.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
There is no information available regarding the cooperation style, as the speaker is focused solely on demanding the withdrawal of the bill and maintaining strong opposition, without proposing any opportunities for collaboration with the current supporters of the draft.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The regional focus highlights the necessity of differentiating urban areas (like the Lasnamäe apartment block that was mentioned) and rural areas (such as the little old lady living by the forest edge) when implementing regulations. The speaker stresses that a unified regulation fails to account for the unique characteristics of these diverse living environments.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Insufficient data.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Regarding social issues, the focus is on ensuring social justice in the implementation of regulations, contrasting residents of large apartment buildings with those in rural areas, and demanding the differentiation of obligations according to the needs of specific population groups.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is currently centered on opposing the environmental draft bill regarding waste sorting. The speaker is demanding the withdrawal of the bill and the differentiation of its provisions to account for the needs and obligations of various population groups.
4 Speeches Analyzed