Agenda Profile: Mart Helme

Second reading of the draft law amending the Whistleblower Protection Act concerning EU law violations and the International Sanctions Act (EU restrictive measures directive) (584 SE)

2025-04-23

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

Political Position
The political position is strongly opposed to Draft Bill 584 SE, which concerns whistleblower protection and the enforcement of sanctions, calling it a "Stalinist stench" and a threat to public trust. The stance is value-based, emphasizing the loss of Estonian sovereignty and the slavish adherence to European Union directives. Before creating a new law, they demand that the case of Kaja Kallas and her family circumventing sanctions be addressed, highlighting the government's hypocrisy.

1 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates historical awareness regarding the atmosphere of Soviet-era work collectives and the practice of denunciation, using this to illustrate the perilous nature of the draft bill. Although the implementation of the EU directive and the topic of sanctions are addressed, the focus remains on political criticism and questions of timing, rather than technical or legal analysis.

1 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetoric is highly combative, emotional, and provocative, employing powerful negative metaphors such as "Stalinist stench" and "puppet republic." The appeals rely mainly on emotion and historical analogies, referencing the Soviet-era culture of "informing" (or "snitching") and personal experiences of being penalized. The style is confrontational, featuring rhetorical questions and direct accusations leveled against the government.

1 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker is actively engaged in the legislative debate, participating in the second reading of the draft legislation to present a strong opposing position. This pattern of action includes making a procedural motion (to interrupt the reading) to underscore the opposition. The speech focuses on the substantive and historical critique of the specific bill.

1 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The primary opponents are the bill's supporters, who face accusations of attempting to restore the Stalinist order and transforming Estonia into a mere "euro-provincial backwater." Particularly harsh criticism has been leveled at Prime Minister Kaja Kallas and her family concerning the evasion of sanctions, with critics branding them hypocrites. A compromise is out of the question, given the proposal to immediately terminate the reading of the draft legislation.

1 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
Insufficient Data

1 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is directed toward international and national issues, covering the implementation of the European Union directive, sanctions policy, and the diminution of Estonian sovereignty. The discussion also touches upon the impact of the duration of the war in Ukraine and the potential lifting of sanctions by the United States. There is no regional or local focus.

1 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Economic views are tied to criticism of sanctions policy, with the stated goal of the draft bill (preventing the circumvention of sanctions) being deemed hypocritical. Emphasis is placed on the need to address the alleged sanctions violation by Kaja Kallas's family. No direct positions on taxes, spending, or economic growth are presented.

1 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
The main social issue revolves around preserving civil liberties and a trusting work environment, standing in opposition to the Soviet-era culture of informing (or denunciation). The draft legislation is viewed as a threat that would restore an unpleasant atmosphere in work collectives and disrupt the social order.

1 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
Legislative attention is focused on strong opposition to Draft Bill 584 SE (whistleblower protection and sanctions), as it represents a slavish transposition of the EU directive. The speaker opposes the bill and proposes that its second reading be immediately suspended to prevent its further advancement.

1 Speeches Analyzed