Agenda Profile: Mart Helme
Security
2025-11-05
15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Information Hour
Political Position
The political stance is strongly oppositional, focusing on issues of security and civil defense. The speaker forcefully rejects the myth promoted by the Reform Party regarding "security in safe hands," instead highlighting security gaps and catastrophic preparedness for crisis situations. The framework is strongly results-oriented, demanding accountability for omissions and irresponsible spending of funds, including from the Prime Minister.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates competence in the field of national defense and internal security, citing the content of the National Defense Committee's report and the State Auditor's observations regarding the missing 700 million euros. The professional focus is on logistical and operational readiness, highlighting specific deficiencies in the evacuation of the population, the expediting of food supplies, and the capacity of the Rescue Board.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The tone of the speech is critical, urgent, and at times confrontational, utilizing strong phrases such as "a serious alarm signal" and "in a catastrophically bad situation." The speaker employs both logical (deductive method) and emotional appeals, particularly concerning the vandalism of the Sinimäed monument, and demands accountability and common sense.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker's pattern of activity is linked to their parliamentary duties, specifically by posing pointed questions to the government regarding security matters. Personal travel is also mentioned (from Tartu to Tallinn on a Sunday evening), the observations from which (highway traffic congestion) are then utilized as the foundation for political inquiries.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The main criticism is directed at the Reform Party-led government and the Prime Minister, demanding accountability for security lapses and financial shortfalls. The criticism is both policy-based and performance-based, accusing the government of being toothless and inert regarding internal security (Sinimäed) and civil defense issues. Personal reproaches against former Commanders of the Defence Forces are denied, but the demand for accountability remains.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
Insufficient data. The speaker is currently in a critical opposition role and does not indicate a willingness to cooperate or compromise with other political forces.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
It focuses on national security but uses regional examples to illustrate the problems. The Tartu-Tallinn highway is mentioned in the context of evacuation logistics, as well as the looting of the Sinimäed complex (Ida-Virumaa) as an example of internal security issues and fifth column activity.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Data regarding the general economic outlook is insufficient. However, strong criticism is being voiced regarding the irresponsible spending of state funds and the disappearance of 700 million euros in national defense, demanding strict fiscal accountability and transparency in defense procurements.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
The speaker strongly emphasizes the protection of internal security and national identity, calling the desecration of Sinimäed a direct act against the Estonian state. Criticism is leveled at the state's inability to utilize its e-government and surveillance capabilities to identify and prevent these "thugs," referencing the threat posed by the fifth column.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The focus is on demanding the implementation of the results from existing reports (the National Defence Committee report) and oversight (the Auditor General). Previous engagement with "camera bills" is mentioned, referring to the state's intelligence capability, which should be better utilized to ensure internal security.
2 Speeches Analyzed