By Plenary Sessions: Helle-Moonika Helme

The speaker is critical of directing billions of euros toward renewable energy developers, viewing this as prioritizing a profit cartel at the expense of the taxpayer. He also stresses the necessity of protecting households from electricity price anomalies and questions the state's fiscal responsibility. Furthermore, he demands a temporary suspension of CO2 and environmental fees during the crisis.

The economic perspectives offered are limited to criticizing the impact of funds distributed by politicians on scientific consensus, stressing that science itself is dependent on the money politicians hand out. There are no stated positions on taxes, trade, or broader economic policy.

The prevailing economic stance is firmly opposed to new taxes, particularly in a climate where inflation is already eroding budgets that are stretched thin. The focus is on protecting wage earners and low-income individuals, favoring instead a responsible fiscal policy that avoids burdening citizens with extra levies. New taxes are viewed as both irresponsible and unjust.

The economic views are pro-market and anti-regulation, stressing that climate agreements damage the national economy and undermine people's ability to cope financially. They support consumer freedom regarding vehicle choice (opposing mandatory electric vehicles) and criticize the subsidization of costly renewable energy projects.