Session Profile: Helle-Moonika Helme
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session.
2024-06-12
Political Position
The political stance is strongly opposed to the Commission's substantive proposal, as it fundamentally alters the originally intended substance. The position is clearly procedural and policy-driven, emphasizing the necessity of preserving the original objective. The speaker demands a vote on the amendment to prevent the distortion of the content.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
Expertise is evident in the legislative procedure and in the assessment of the substantive impact of amendments. Terms such as "amendment" and "committee proposal" are used, which indicates a familiarity with the details of parliamentary work. Technical data or statistics are absent.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is direct and formal, focusing on procedural explanation and requesting a vote. The tone is businesslike and logical, emphasizing the radical impact of the change on the content. Emotional appeals are absent.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The data is limited to a single intervention during the plenary session, related to the request for a vote. There is insufficient data to assess broader patterns of activity.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The opposition is aimed at a specific Commission proposal, which is being criticized for completely changing its substance. The criticism is policy-driven and intense, as it jeopardizes their original request. The possibility of compromise is not mentioned.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The pronoun "we" is used, indicating cooperation with one's own faction or circle of supporters regarding shared content and voting strategy. There is no information regarding openness to compromise or cross-party cooperation.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
Insufficient data.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Insufficient data.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Insufficient data.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is on processing amendments and calling for a vote. The speaker objects to the committee's proposal, which entirely alters the substance of the draft bill. The priority is defending the original legislative objective.
1 Speeches Analyzed