Session Profile: Helle-Moonika Helme
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
2024-06-05
Political Position
The core political position centers heavily on national sovereignty and transparency, standing in opposition to the rising influence of international organizations (the UN, WHO, IMF, and the Bilderberg Group). The speaker contends that Estonia’s security, economic, and healthcare policies are being dictated from abroad, which constitutes a major problem. This is a strongly value-based stance, demanding that the country be governed by politicians who hold a mandate, rather than by unelected organizations.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates awareness of high-level international organizations and forums (e.g., the Bilderberg Group, the Trilateral Commission). The information presented focuses on the alleged influence these organizations have on national security, economic, and health policies. Technical data or statistics are absent; the emphasis is placed on describing the nature of the organizations themselves.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is critical, combative, and demanding, particularly when addressing the government and the session chairman. Strong language is employed (e.g., "secret meeting," "a very serious problem," "absolutely false accusations"), and the public's right to know is stressed. The speaker is direct and categorically refutes the accusations made by the opposition.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The mode of operation is reactive, focusing on questions regarding the government's activities (specifically the Prime Minister's meetings) during the Riigikogu's information hour (Q&A session). The speaker demands repeated investigation and full public accountability to the people of Estonia and the wider public. This pattern involves continuous scrutiny of the government's actions and the persistent demand for transparency.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The main opponent is the government, specifically Prime Minister Kaja Kallas (over the secret meeting) and the Foreign Minister (over the insufficient response). The criticism is procedural (lack of transparency, secret meetings) and political (surrendering sovereignty). The speaker vehemently rejects the opposing side's accusations, labeling them absurd and false.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
Cooperation is lacking; the speaker challenges the impartiality of the session chair and requests that he issue a reprimand to his party colleague, the Foreign Minister. The focus is on holding the opposing side responsible and demanding accountability, rather than seeking compromises.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is on international relations and the national level, addressing questions of Estonian sovereignty in the context of global organizations. Regional or local focus is lacking.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
The economic perspectives discussed are linked to sovereignty and transparency, standing in opposition to the economic policy guidelines issued by international organizations (IMF). Emphasis is placed on the taxpayer's right to know who covered the costs of the prime minister's travel and hotels, underscoring the necessity of fiscal transparency.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Social issues are confined to the topic of healthcare policy sovereignty, contrasting with the influence of the WHO. Other social topics are absent from the data.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
There is a lack of legislative focus; the speaker is instead engaged in exercising oversight over government activities and demanding accountability during the Riigikogu information session. The priority is ensuring the transparency of the executive branch.
2 Speeches Analyzed