Agenda Profile: Helle-Moonika Helme
First reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Appointment of Martin Triipan as a Member of the Supreme Court" (744 OE)
2025-11-11
XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
Political Position
The speaker focuses on defending the Supreme Court's credibility and the principles of the rule of law, sharply criticizing the trend where court rulings serve as a cover for political directives. He stresses the necessity of restoring public faith in law and justice, while simultaneously questioning the Supreme Court’s actions, which he argues erode the trustworthiness of the rule of law. This is a strongly value-based stance that prioritizes the independence of the judicial system.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates knowledge of litigation and Supreme Court case law, using specific terminology such as the "right of appeal," and referring to the complete reversal of decisions made by the two preceding court instances. He analyzes a tendency within the Supreme Court's activity that is perceived (or intuitive), yet legally sound, and connected to political guidelines. Furthermore, he is aware of the developments in the specific Nursipalu court case.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The style is analytical, critical, and formal, making it suitable for a parliamentary debate. The speaker balances the description of legal details (procedural specifics) with an emotional appeal concerning the erosion of trust in the rule of law. Finally, a direct and specific question is posed to the candidate regarding a potential conflict of interest.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
Not enough data.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
Criticism is directed against the activities of the Supreme Court and the tendency to make decisions related to political guidelines, which undermines the credibility of the rule of law. A direct confrontation also arises regarding the candidate’s previous role, where they represented the state against local people in the Nursipalu issue, demanding clarification about possible recusal.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
Not enough data.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
Attention is focused on the regional conflict in Nursipalu, where the Ministry of Defense has clashed with local residents. This highlights the importance of protecting the rights of local communities within the context of national interests.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Not enough data.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
On the topic of social issues, the conflict between the rights of local residents and the state (specifically the Ministry of Defence) is being highlighted in the Nursipalu case. This underscores the necessity of ensuring justice and maintaining the credibility of the rule of law for citizens.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The primary focus is on legislative oversight and assessing the suitability of the Supreme Court member candidate (the appointment of a Supreme Court member). The speaker acts as the questioner regarding the candidate's past activities and potential conflicts of interest, seeking to ensure the impartiality of the judicial system.
1 Speeches Analyzed