Agenda Profile: Helle-Moonika Helme
2024 Report by the Minister of the Interior on the Implementation of the State's Long-Term Development Strategy "Estonia 2035"
2024-09-16
The 15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting.
Political Position
The political stance is strongly anti-government, focusing on fiscal opacity (the non-transparent allocation of 2.4 billion) and issues concerning historical memory. The speaker emphasizes the legal continuity of the Republic of Estonia and sharply criticizes the government's actions regarding the Lihula monument and the repression of freedom fighters. The framing is strongly value-based and critical of the government's activities.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates knowledge of the Ministry of the Interior's operations and chain of command, particularly regarding the Lihula monument incident, mentioning illegal surveillance and preventative measures. The speaker also refers to a specific sum (2.4 billion) in the context of the opaque 2023 budget allocation, criticizing the fiscal management.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is highly combative, accusatory, and emotionally charged, employing strong labels such as "socialist," "class hatred agenda," and "acts of plunder." The speaker appeals to fundamental values (the fight for freedom, legal continuity) and sharply contrasts the government's actions with the objectives of the "Estonia 2035" strategy.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The records indicate participation in the debate surrounding the Minister of the Interior's presentation in September 2024, suggesting active involvement in criticizing the government's long-term strategic documents and activities.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The primary opponent is the government and the Minister of the Interior, who is being branded a socialist and an agent promoting the agenda of class hatred. The criticism is intense and accusatory, focusing on the government's illegal activities (surveillance, the Lihula events) and fiscal opacity. There is no sign of willingness to compromise; instead, a fundamental change in attitude is being demanded.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
Not enough data
3 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The regional focus is tied to historical memory, highlighting specific locations such as Lihula and Sinimäed, and contrasting the government's attitude toward the people in those areas with the interaction seen at the Bronze Soldier on May 9th.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
The economic views are strongly opposed to socialist taxation, particularly the taxation of the wealthy, which is deemed an agenda of class warfare. The speaker demands fiscal transparency and sharply criticizes the opaque distribution of 2.4 billion euros, accusing the government of outright theft.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
The primary social issue revolves around historical memory and national identity, stressing the necessity of honoring freedom fighters while opposing their repression. The speaker sharply criticizes the illegal actions of the state authorities (such as surveillance and brutal measures) used to restrict citizens' freedoms.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is directed towards scrutinizing the legal compliance of the government's actions and the Ministry of the Interior's chain of command, particularly regarding illegal surveillance activities and the confiscation of monuments. Specific new draft laws are not mentioned, but emphasis is placed on adhering to the principles of the rule of law and maintaining legal continuity.
3 Speeches Analyzed