By Months: Anti Haugas

Total Months: 16

Fully Profiled: 16

All Categories Political Position Topic Expertise Rhetorical Style Activity Patterns Opposition Stance Collaboration Style Regional Focus Economic Views Social Issues Legislative Focus
10.2025

1 Speeches

There are no references to opponents or criticism. The speaker mentions Peeter Ernits's question regarding fines, but it is presented as an informative inquiry, not as opposition.
Details View Details
09.2025

2 Speeches

Insufficient data.
Details View Details
06.2025

20 Speeches

The primary criticism is aimed at the Social Democrats (Sotsid), taking issue with both their political direction (Swedish prison issues, Tanel Kiik's "ideological drift") and their procedural moves. The critic also targets previous governments and interior ministers (including representatives from Isamaa) for 16 years of legal uncertainty regarding the use of license plate recognition cameras. The criticism is predominantly policy- and procedure-based, rather than personal, with the exception of the reference to Kiik's ideological drift.
Details View Details
04.2025

1 Speeches

The primary opposition is aimed at the leadership of the Moscow Patriarchate and Patriarch Kirill, who are accused of justifying war crimes and supporting the concept of *russki mir*. The speaker indirectly criticizes those who question the timing of the legislation, referencing Martin Helme, but concedes that the law could have been adopted sooner.
Details View Details
03.2025

3 Speeches

It stands in opposition to the black-and-white position of the Isamaa faction (Jaanus Karilaid) concerning the total closure of borders, pointing out the unresolved issues for Estonian citizens. The critique targets the practical repercussions of the policy and the fact that no solution is offered for citizens who remain stranded beyond the border.
Details View Details
02.2025

2 Speeches

The main opponent is Patriarch Kirill of Moscow, who is sharply criticized for ideological and security reasons and is repeatedly called a war criminal. Criticism is also directed at organizations supporting Kirill's authority, such as the Foundation for the Protection of Family and Tradition, which opposes the achievement of autonomy. A compromise regarding remaining under Kirill’s leadership is ruled out.
Details View Details
01.2025

1 Speeches

The criticism is aimed at those political parties and parliament members who support lowering the VAT on foodstuffs, accusing them of promoting a measure that is both ineffective and costly to the state. The speaker argues that the opponents' proposals primarily enrich merchants and wealthier consumers, rather than helping the target groups who actually need assistance. The opposition is strong and fundamentally policy-driven.
Details View Details
12.2024

4 Speeches

Insufficient data.
Details View Details
11.2024

2 Speeches

Insufficient data.
Details View Details
10.2024

6 Speeches

The main opponent being criticized is the EKRE faction, which is accused of deliberate obstruction and hindering the work of the Riigikogu by failing to present the draft legislation. The criticism is intense and directed at the opponents' unethical behavior and their unwillingness to resolve the situation. He distances himself from the opponents' activities, calling them embarrassing.
Details View Details
09.2024

2 Speeches

There is no direct political confrontation; criticism is instead aimed at systemic shortcomings, such as the shortage of instructors and training bases in the police, rescue services, and defense forces. He points to the need to resolve outstanding political issues, such as the voting rights of non-citizens.
Details View Details
06.2024

3 Speeches

There is an absence of direct opponents or criticism aimed at specific political groups. Skepticism is instead directed toward ineffective policy measures, such as an expensive technical solution for protecting children online.
Details View Details
05.2024

6 Speeches

He directly criticizes procedural obstruction in the Riigikogu, referencing members of the EKRE faction who admitted the obstructionist nature of their proposed amendments, and suggests discontinuing the practice of taking breaks. He supports the government's stance that laws should only be amended when there is a specific problem requiring immediate resolution.
Details View Details
04.2024

1 Speeches

The criticism is aimed at the actions of the National Broadcasting Corporation, arguing that the failure to mention the league's name pushes sponsors away from the sport, regardless of their sense of mission. This is institutional criticism concerning media coverage policy and its negative effect on private sector support.
Details View Details
03.2024

4 Speeches

The opposition is aimed at the proponents of the bill (implicitly the EKRE faction), who seek to impose a ban on the burqa and niqab. The criticism is policy-based, arguing that the ban is premature and could worsen the situation for women by isolating them from social assistance. Procedural criticism was also raised concerning the actions of Martin Helme, who was briefly present during the presentation of the bill and then disappeared.
Details View Details
02.2024

1 Speeches

Insufficient data
Details View Details
Back to Profiling