Session Profile: Andre Hanimägi
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
2025-04-23
Political Position
The political focus centers on the transposition of European Union law, particularly regarding whistleblower protection and the violation of international sanctions. The speaker supports the continued processing of draft law 584, stressing the necessity of making the initial effective date more realistic. His approach is strongly policy- and procedure-driven, ensuring the correct implementation of the legislation.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates in-depth knowledge of the legislative process and European Union directives, particularly concerning whistleblower protection and the breach of international sanctions. They are capable of differentiating between various directives and clarifying the bill's impact on Estonian law. This expertise is further visible in the precise citation of the details of the committee's work and its procedural decisions.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The style is formal, neutral, and focused on procedural reporting, presenting the decisions of the Legal Affairs Committee and a summary of the discussion. The speaker employs a logical approach, clarifying the substance of the draft bill and the rationale behind the proposed amendments, while strictly avoiding emotional appeals. The tone is professional and informative, beginning with customary greetings ("Thank you, Deputy Speaker! Esteemed colleagues!").
1 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The individual's involvement is tied to the work of the Riigikogu Legal Affairs Committee, where they participated in a discussion on April 14th and made proposals for placing the draft bill on the agenda on April 22nd. This operational pattern is aimed at managing the processing of legislation and presenting committee reports to the plenary session. They are actively engaged in scheduling the readings of draft bills and coordinating procedural decisions.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
No direct opposition or criticism is expressed; the speaker limits themselves to presenting the facts. It is only mentioned that the motion to conclude the second reading received three opposing votes, but the motives of those opponents are neither analyzed nor criticized.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The cooperation style is consensual and compromise-oriented, particularly within the Legal Committee, where an amendment concerning the effective date was adopted by consensus. The speaker references questions raised by colleagues (such as Priit Sibul), demonstrating an openness to further discussion and clarification.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is on national legislation and the transposition of European Union law, addressing the topic of international sanctions and restrictive measures. There is no regional or local focus.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Insufficient data.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
The Whistleblower Protection Act is discussed, concerning employment law and the protection of individuals when reporting breaches of EU law. The focus, however, is on the legal and procedural framework, rather than on broader social values or moral issues.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The main legislative priority is Bill 584, which amends the Whistleblower and International Sanctions Acts. The speaker is a supporter of the bill and serves as the committee rapporteur, focusing on eliminating procedural obstacles (e.g., an unrealistic effective date) and scheduling the readings.
1 Speeches Analyzed