Agenda Profile: Andre Hanimägi
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Name Act and the State Fee Act (719 SE)
2025-10-22
XV Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
Political Position
The political stance on the draft bill is generally supportive ("Highly positive"), though the need for clarity regarding restrictions on name changes is emphasized. There is a strong focus on public safety, necessitating a swift solution to close the legal loophole concerning name changes by criminals and their ability to work with children. The formation of this position prioritizes the details of policy implementation and values associated with security.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates detailed awareness of the amendments to the Name Act, specifically referencing the discussions held in the commission regarding restrictions. Their expertise focuses on the specifics of the law's implementation, especially concerning historical and family-related names, and aspects of ensuring security. They specifically ask whether a German name used prior to Estonianization would receive the green light under the new law.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is predominantly interrogative and analytical, seeking specific clarifications from the minister regarding the implementation of the law. A touch of light humor is employed, comparing the minister's presentation to a "TV shopping vibe," which lends a slightly informal air to the tone. The overall approach is logical, focusing on political substance rather than emotional appeals.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker is active in the legislative process, participating in the first reading of the draft bill and submitting clarifying questions to the minister. Their patterns of activity include participation in the work of the committee, which they reference in their questions.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
There are no direct references to opponents or groups being criticized; the focus is on clarifying the details of the government's policy and the proposed bill.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The collaborative style is respectful and constructive, focused on obtaining clarifications from the minister. The speaker uses the previous answers of the minister and other colleagues (Ms. Solman) as the foundation for their questions, demonstrating engagement with the ongoing discussion.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
Not enough data
2 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Not enough data
2 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Among the social issues, strong emphasis is placed on public safety and child protection, demanding the swift closure of a legal loophole that currently permits criminals to change their names. Furthermore, cultural identity is addressed in relation to the recognition of historical and genuinely Estonian names.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is on the draft amendment (719 SE) to the Names Act and the State Fees Act. The speaker is a proponent of the bill, concentrating on the details of its implementation, specifically the clarity of restrictions and the rapid elimination of security gaps. They are striving to ensure that too much time does not elapse between the law's passage and the resolution of the secondary concern.
2 Speeches Analyzed