Session Profile: Kalle Grünthal
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
2025-04-22
Political Position
The political position is firmly focused on ensuring clarity in lawmaking and guaranteeing equal treatment. The speaker vehemently opposes the use of discretionary authority in the enforcement of the law, arguing that it creates the potential for unequal treatment of individuals and is therefore hazardous. This stance is policy-driven and underscores the principles of the rule of law.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates detailed expertise in the field of the law of obligations and consumer protection, referencing specific statutes and legal terminology such as "justified interest" and "unreasonably onerous." He/She focuses on the technical aspects of implementing legislation, such as the burden of proof and the limits of discretionary power.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is initially formal and inquisitive, but it quickly shifts to critical and cautionary, emphasizing the danger of heading down the "slippery slope." The speaker relies on logical arguments to demonstrate the injustice and inequality involved in the application of discretionary power, while simultaneously employing emotional warnings regarding the potential for abuse of authority.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The data covers only a single day of the sitting, during which two consecutive questions were posed concerning the same draft law. This suggests active involvement in the discussion of the specifics of that particular piece of legislation.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The opposition is directed against the bill's flawed wording and the introduction of discretionary power, criticizing it as a potential avenue for the unequal treatment of individuals. The criticism is intense and politically motivated, warning that when the law is implemented, individuals might be favored or burdened based on their perceived undesirability.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
There is no data regarding cooperation, willingness to compromise, or cross-factional activity. The focus is on criticizing the presenter and demanding answers to questions.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is on national legislation and the implementation of law; there are no references to specific regional interests or projects.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Economic perspectives focus on ensuring consumer protection and making sure that the burden of proof is not unreasonably heavy for the consumer. The emphasis is placed on legal fairness and protecting the consumer against vague legal provisions.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
The central social issue is ensuring the principle of equal treatment in the application of the law, warning that discretionary power can lead to unfair treatment. The objective is to protect individuals, especially consumers, from subjective and arbitrary treatment.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is currently on supplementing the Law of Obligations Act, with the priority being to ensure clarity within the statutory text and prevent any unreasonable burden on the consumer. The speaker is acting as a critical opponent and overseer of the draft legislation, demanding the clarification of ambiguous criteria.
2 Speeches Analyzed