Session Profile: Kalle Grünthal
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session
2025-03-12
Political Position
The political position strongly centers on institutional accountability and securing the role of the Riigikogu (Parliament) in relation to the government. The speaker forcefully demands that members of the government must report to the Riigikogu, and stresses strict adherence to the law governing the status of a Riigikogu member. This position is value-based, emphasizing the protection of constitutional values and parliamentary authority.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The analysis focuses on the parliament's internal rules of procedure, constitutional processes, and legislation, particularly the Riigikogu Member Status Act. The speaker demonstrates knowledge regarding the role of committees and criticizes their operations, viewing the Constitutional Committee as one of the strongest institutions, yet simultaneously one that engages in political maneuvering.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is combative, critical, and direct, employing strong institutional arguments. To emphasize accountability, a simple yet powerful analogy from everyday life is utilized (the firing of an arrogant employee). The tone is logical and procedural rather than emotional, focusing instead on exposing rule violations.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker is active in the plenary sessions of the Riigikogu and is involved in initiating legislation. He mentions a bill he initiated, which he plans to defend the following day in the National Defence Committee, indicating active participation in committee work.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The primary criticism is aimed at the Constitutional Committee, which is being accused of engaging in political games and neglecting its role as the upholder of constitutional values. Government members are also facing criticism for failing to fulfill their obligation to report to the Riigikogu and respond to members' demands. The criticism is intense and focuses on procedural and institutional violations.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The referencing of Valdo Randpere’s arguments hints at cooperation, indicating the existence of a shared concern regarding procedural issues. There is no information about broader cross-party cooperation or a readiness to compromise concerning the criticized committees.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
Not enough data.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
There is not enough data.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
There is not enough data.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is directed towards ensuring the internal rules of the Riigikogu and the accountability of the government, while emphasizing compliance with the law governing the status of a Riigikogu member. The speaker is an active initiator of draft legislation, specifically mentioning a bill they introduced which they plan to defend before the National Defence Committee.
3 Speeches Analyzed