Session Profile: Kalle Grünthal

Strong opposition to the government’s tax policy and the expansion of the use of the Defence Forces in foreign missions, particularly in the context of Ukraine. The central framework is the detrimental nature of the government’s actions toward the Estonian people, affecting them both economically (through excise duty hikes) and physically (sending people to war, the health impact of wind turbines). These positions are sharply contrasting and value-based, emphasizing national defense and the welfare of the populace. The political stance is aimed at blocking the government’s activities and issuing a warning to the public.

Shows knowledge of the National Defence Act (citing Section 34, Subsection 2) and the regulation of international military operations. Exceptionally detailed awareness of the health effects of wind turbines, especially concerning low-frequency noise and infrasound frequencies (up to 20 Hz, 1 Hz impact zone 343 m). Raises scientific data regarding COVID-19 mRNA vaccines (DNA contamination, carcinogenicity), referencing studies in Australia, France, and the USA.

The tone is extremely combative, accusatory, and dramatic, utilizing strong emotional appeals. It employs sharp metaphors, labeling the government a "state criminal mafia" and accusing them of the "physical destruction" of the Estonian people and "intentional killing for the sake of business interests." It addresses the audience directly as "Good people of Estonia" and uses rhetorical questions to underscore the unreasonableness of the government's actions.

They spoke on two consecutive session days (December 4 and December 5), addressing several questions and delivering a longer speech, which demonstrates high activity in the plenary debates. The speeches focused on security, as well as social and economic issues. Notably, one extended address concerning public health was given at two o'clock in the morning.

The main opponents are the ruling government coalition (the Reform Party, Estonia 200, and the Social Democrats), who are accused of destroying Estonia through tax hikes and healthcare issues. The criticism is intense, ranging from political accusations (maintaining the current wartime course) to criminal framing (such as comparisons to the mafia). Specifically, Foreign Minister Margus Tsahkna and Prime Minister Kristen Michal are being criticized.

There is no sign of direct cooperation or willingness to compromise with the government; instead, the focus is on opposing and blocking the government's draft legislation. (The subject) cites the arguments of colleagues (Leo Kunnas, Aivar Kokk) to support their position of opposition.

The focus is mainly on national issues (tax policy, deployment of the Defence Forces) and international topics (the war in Ukraine, NATO). A domestic regional aspect emerges through the emphasis placed on the health concerns of residents living near wind farms and in their immediate surrounding areas.

Strongly opposed to excise duty increases (alcohol, tobacco, fuel, electricity), arguing that this "will strip the Estonian people of their last resources." They believe that tax revenue is unfairly channeled toward fulfilling the long-term support agreement for Ukraine (100 million euros annually). The government's policy is criticized for "milking the dairy cow dry and then taking it to the slaughterhouse."

The text focuses on public health issues, particularly the harmful effects of infrasound and low-frequency noise generated by wind turbines, demanding that their construction be halted due to a lack of regulatory standards. It also sharply raises the safety concerns surrounding COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, referencing DNA contamination and linking it to a rise in cancers and sudden deaths. It advises people not to get the mRNA shots.

The primary focus is opposing government bills (such as the deployment of the Defense Forces, excise tax hikes, and the Public Health Act) and bringing their inherent dangers to light. It raises procedural questions concerning the handling of unconstitutional amendments. An attempt was made in the Social Affairs Committee to initiate a proposal to halt the use of mRNA vaccines.