Session Profile: Kalle Grünthal
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
2024-06-11
Political Position
The political position is firmly set against interference in the internal affairs of other nations, stressing the absolute nature of sovereignty and a value-based approach. He considers the statement under discussion detrimental, as it only serves to escalate an already tense global situation. The position is highly confrontational and questions the utility of the statement, arguing that, in the speaker's view, it is utterly pointless.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The text demonstrates awareness of international relations and the principle of sovereignty, specifically addressing the issue of interference in another state's internal affairs. The argument relies more on a personal analogy involving a trivial example than on technical data or statistics.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is highly confrontational, straightforward, and informative. It uses a vivid, personal, and somewhat vulgar analogy (the example of the apartment and the chair) to illustrate the principle of sovereignty. The tone is emotional and extremely dismissive, offering a direct and rude rejection.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
Not enough data.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
He/She strongly opposes the submitters of the statement and their supporters, criticizing them for interference and escalating the situation. The criticism is intense and includes extremely blunt personal rejection, which completely rules out any compromise.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
Not enough data.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is clearly on international issues, specifically regarding interference in the internal affairs of other countries and the escalation of the global situation. There is no mention of local or domestic topics.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Not enough data.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Not enough data.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The focus is on criticizing and opposing a political statement or declaration, rather than specific legislation (draft bills).
1 Speeches Analyzed