Agenda Profile: Kalle Grünthal
First Reading of the Draft Act Amending the Public Prosecutor's Office Act (105 SE)
2024-01-16
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
Political Position
The political position heavily focuses on the accountability of the legal system and the oversight of the Prosecutor's Office's activities. The speaker demands an explanation as to why the Prosecutor's Office failed to initiate criminal proceedings against a prosecutor who, according to a Supreme Court ruling, fabricated evidence. This position is clearly aimed at ensuring the principles of the rule of law and the implementation of the Penal Code, stressing the necessity of treating court decisions with due respect.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates competence in the legal domain, especially regarding matters of the prosecution service and court procedure. He/She accurately distinguishes between the functions of adjudication (the courts) and procedure (the prosecution service) and refers to specific legal concepts, such as "fabricated evidence," "a judgment that has entered into force," and "an unlawful charge." In his/her argumentation, he/she relies on the sanctions outlined in the Penal Code.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is formal and interrogative, employing logical argumentation and references to legal authority (Simon Levin). The tone is critical and demands clarification, particularly concerning the inaction of the prosecutor's office, but the addresses to the session chairman and the recipient are respectful. The style is primarily procedural, focusing on facts rather than emotional appeals.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker is actively engaged in the legislative debate, taking part in the first reading of the draft amendment to the Public Prosecutor's Office Act. They raise repeated questions and propose amendments concerning procedural roles, while also pointing out the lack of prior discussions within the committee. This pattern of activity demonstrates a focus on the specific bill and the related issues of accountability.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The primary criticism is aimed at the Prosecutor's Office, citing their inaction and avoidance of responsibility concerning the creation of fabricated evidence. The criticism is procedural, focusing on why sanctions stipulated in the Criminal Code were not applied for filing an unlawful charge. The intensity of the criticism is moderate, but substantively sharp, demanding specific mechanisms of accountability.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The speaker draws upon the example and arguments presented by a colleague (Kert Kingo), demonstrating a certain degree of cooperation in addressing the topic. Communication with the addressee (Valdo) is direct and corrective (regarding the role of the prosecutor's office), but remains polite, as the speaker seeks answers regarding existing mechanisms.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
No data available.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
No data available
2 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
No data available.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is on the draft bill amending the Public Prosecutor's Office Act (105 SE), which raises questions regarding the accountability of prosecutors and internal control mechanisms. The speaker is attempting to find the necessary levers to ensure follow-up proceedings based on the criticisms cited in court judgments. In the context of the draft law, the speaker functions primarily as a questioner and a highlighter of critical points.
2 Speeches Analyzed