Agenda Profile: Kalle Grünthal
First reading of the Bill for the Amendment of the Vital Statistics Registration Act (106 SE)
2024-01-11
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
Political Position
The main focus is on the deliberation of the draft amendment to the Vital Statistics Act, particularly concerning the registration of home births. The speaker supports moving forward with sensible bills, emphasizing that the issue affects real people in real life, not just political factions. He/She sharply criticizes the coalition's tendency to automatically reject opposition bills, stressing the need to prioritize political tolerance and consensus.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates knowledge of civil law principles ("that which is not prohibited is permitted") and the application of the burden of proof in the context of a general practitioner. He/She possesses a detailed understanding of the Riigikogu's operational procedures, demanding explanations regarding the agenda and the conduct of sessions with precise reference to the relevant sections. Furthermore, he/she questions the constitutionality of restricting the legislative initiative rights of members of parliament.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The tone is predominantly formal and logical, focusing on legal and procedural arguments. The speaker employs direct questioning and demands precise legal answers, particularly in procedural disputes. He appeals to consensus and tolerance, but is simultaneously critical of the coalition's "your-bills-and-our-bills methodology."
4 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker is active in Riigikogu sessions, participating in extended debates and intervening on matters concerning the agenda and procedure. They interact with Riigikogu structures, specifically mentioning consulting the legal advisor of the Legal Affairs Committee to gain procedural clarity. They are also attentive to the session schedule and when the agenda is exhausted.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The primary criticism is aimed at the coalition and the ministry, which are using justifications to reject opposition bills—justifications that restrict the right of initiative of MPs. She sharply criticizes the "your-and-our-bills methodology" and Liisa Pakosta's explanation concerning the work underway at the ministry. The criticism is primarily procedural, calling into question the parliament's rules of procedure and constitutionality.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The speaker values the pertinent comments made by colleagues (Joller, Lutsar) and stresses the necessity of achieving consensus before the draft legislation can be sent to its second reading. He notes that the opposition has frequently supported government bills, demonstrating a willingness for tolerance and cooperation when the proposals are sensible. He is endeavoring to find solutions that incorporate relevant stakeholders, such as general practitioners.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
Insufficient data.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Not enough data
4 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
The speaker is addressing a social issue concerning the legal registration of home births, emphasizing that this is a real-world matter that impacts people. They support finding a solution that would clarify the burden of proof for family doctors, based on the civil law principle that what is not forbidden is permitted.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The primary focus is the Draft Act amending the Vital Statistics Registration Act (Bill 106 SE), and the individual is a strong supporter of its further processing. He/She concentrates on procedural issues, demanding the bill be sent for a second reading and criticizing the restriction of legislative initiative rights for members of parliament. Furthermore, he/she wants to involve family doctors (GPs) and the government in the law-making process.
4 Speeches Analyzed