Agenda Profile: Kalle Grünthal
Draft law amending the Act on the Implementation of the Common Agricultural Policy of the European Union and the Feed Act (546 SE) - First Reading
2024-12-17
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
Political Position
The political focus is directed towards the procedure for adopting European Union legislation in Estonia, emphasizing the role and constitutional competence of the Riigikogu. The speaker expresses strong opposition to the practice where the European Union Affairs Committee (ELAK) is authorized to adopt decisions, viewing this as an unlawful delegation of parliamentary powers. The issues raised are aimed at protecting the sovereignty of the Riigikogu and the constitutional order, thereby calling the current procedural rules into question.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates thorough knowledge of the Estonian Constitution, parliamentary rules of procedure, and the legal nuances involved in the implementation of European Union law. Specific emphasis is placed on the ratification of international treaties and the delegation of legislative competence. The analysis is detailed and focuses on identifying the specific legal provisions that should justify the delegation of such powers.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is formal and legally precise, focusing on logical argumentation and the enforcement of specific legal norms. The speaker uses direct questions to challenge the current procedural order and the rapporteur’s answers. The tone is firm and demanding, seeking clarification regarding the legal basis for the delegation of parliamentary powers.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker's activity pattern is limited to two consecutive and substantively related questions during the deliberation of a single bill. This demonstrates focus and persistence in addressing a specific procedural issue.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The primary objection targets the procedural order of the Riigikogu and the mandates of the European Union Affairs Committee (ELAK), which are deemed to be in conflict with the constitution. Also criticized are the views of coalition members of parliament who assert that the Riigikogu has delegated these powers. The criticism is severe and focuses on procedural irregularity.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
Not enough data
2 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is strictly at the national level (constitution) and the international/pan-European level (implementation of EU legislation). Regional or local topics are absent.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Not enough data
2 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Not enough data
2 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is directed at the constitutional correctness of the bill’s processing, not the content of the bill itself (agricultural policy). The main priority is clarifying the legal basis for the delegation of the parliament’s competence and powers. The speaker is the defender of procedural questions during the bill’s handling.
2 Speeches Analyzed