By Plenary Sessions: Ants Frosch

The speaker holds an oppositional view toward the Foreign Minister and the government, criticizing their decisions concerning symbolic cuts made for the sake of austerity. The criticism is aimed at the rationale behind the policy and the motives of the decision-makers, suggesting a fundamental lack of vision.

The objection is aimed at "the esteemed rapporteur," who presented inaccurate information concerning the speaker's departure from the delegation. The criticism is purely procedural and fact-based, intended to restore the truth, not to attack the individual or the policy.

The primary conflict is with the Ministry of the Interior, which is being criticized for its selective approach to ensuring crisis preparedness and for allowing decisions suspected of being politically motivated to persist. The criticism is intense and directly suggests that municipalities led by mayors who are members of the Isamaa party may be deliberately excluded from programs for political reasons.