By Plenary Sessions: Ants Frosch
Total Sessions: 50
Fully Profiled: 50
2025-09-25
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
The statement was presented to the speaker as a question, seeking confirmation regarding the necessity of the change and the proposed courses of action. Insufficient data.
2025-09-10
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
No data available
2025-09-04
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The cooperation style is open to broad-based collaboration within the opposition, achieved by submitting bills and interpellations jointly with colleagues. The draft Public Service Act was submitted alongside several members of the same faction, whereas the interpellation regarding income tax involved members from various opposition factions (including Isamaa and the Centre Party).
2025-06-18
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker notes that colleagues also have questions regarding the draft bill, indicating a certain shared concern. A direct collaborative style is not evident; rather, it involves addressing questions to the rapporteur during the deliberation process of the bill.
2025-06-17
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
Not enough data.
2025-06-16
XV Riigikogu, V Session, Plenary Sitting
Insufficient data.
2025-06-09
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The style of cooperation is restricted to formal dialogue during the plenary session, specifically by posing a question to the Head of Government. There is no information available regarding cooperation with other members of the Riigikogu.
2025-05-06
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
There is insufficient data regarding the cooperation style.
2025-04-16
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing
Insufficient data.
2025-03-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The text stresses the necessity of statesmanship and finding compromises for the constitutional amendments to be realized, citing the compromise proposal put forth by 55 members. It acknowledges the broad political debate and the pursuit of consensus, which resulted in two competing drafts that were nonetheless approved by the committee. It also notes that the current coalition engages in more dialogue with the opposition than the previous one did.
2025-02-25
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker urges Parliament to consolidate and rally behind the proposal put forward by 23 members of the Riigikogu. This demonstrates a willingness to support a concrete, already submitted initiative and underscores the necessity of unified parliamentary action.
2025-02-13
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary meeting
Cooperation is visible in supporting other colleagues (a reference to colleague Seeder concerning draft law 544), demonstrating a readiness to support technical and essential bills. However, the speaker is uncompromising and sharply critical toward the government coalition, emphasizing that problems cannot simply be pushed off the table.
2025-02-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Insufficient data.
2025-02-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Insufficient data.
2025-01-28
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Insufficient data.
2025-01-22
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session.
There is not enough data.
2025-01-21
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
There is not enough data.
2025-01-20
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The style is collaborative and respectful, posing a question to the minister that necessitates clarifying and promoting the political message. The speaker aims to positively highlight the minister in order to emphasize the topic at hand.
2024-12-09
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary sitting
Based on the data, there is no information regarding cooperation, compromises, or communication with colleagues across party lines.
2024-11-20
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
Supports the rapporteur’s call for coalition members of parliament to process bills 536 and 527 jointly and synergistically. This demonstrates a readiness to support procedural efficiency and the harmonization of the drafts. At the same time, they actively question whether Estonia should take an active or passive approach to implementing reciprocity.
2024-11-11
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The speaker is attempting to find consensus by posing a question to the presenter that emphasizes the positive aspects of accommodation for believers and families. This willingness to cooperate is demonstrated by the effort to link social benefit (the joy for families) with an institutional problem.
2024-10-21
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The style of collaboration is primarily adversarial, although reference is made to questions raised by colleagues (Leo Kunnas), which demonstrates support for and integration of the arguments of other opposition members into the address. There is no indication of a readiness to compromise or cross-party cooperation with the government.
2024-10-07
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
The speaker acknowledges previous bipartisan cooperation (the 2006 signature collection effort) and demands clarity regarding the timeline for submitting the Minister's proposed new cross-party road construction funding plan. He/She indicates a readiness to support this bipartisan approach but insists on its swift implementation.
2024-09-23
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
Not enough data
2024-09-19
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
Insufficient data.
2024-09-16
The 15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting.
There is not enough data.
2024-07-22
15th Riigikogu, Riigikogu's extraordinary session.
Information is scarce. The speaker is operating as a critic and questioner aimed at the executive branch, with no indication of potential cooperation.
2024-05-13
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
Insufficient data.
2024-05-09
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
Regarding cooperation, the need for further collaboration with international organizations, particularly the OSCE, is emphasized in order to fix the electoral system. Domestically, the speaker points to the government coalition's unwillingness to address the problems, which demonstrates a lack of domestic compromise.
2024-05-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session.
The style of cooperation is strongly intra-factional, emphasizing close collaboration with colleagues (Ants Frosch, Leo Kunnas, Alar Laneman) when repeatedly submitting the same draft legislation. The speaker mentions that it was specifically he, along with Leo and Alar, who "pushed hard for" the bill to be brought back into deliberation.
2024-05-06
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
The speaker expresses an initial willingness to discuss the issues of the specific school, viewing it as a welcome opportunity. However, he immediately stresses that the focus must remain on resolving the systemic problem, rather than merely addressing individual cases.
2024-05-02
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The speaker is actively seeking cooperation and mediation, requesting a half-hour recess to communicate with colleagues (e.g., Jaak Aab) and church leaders. He urges them to reach internal conclusions in order to find a future reasonable and "civilized" course of action. He is open to compromise, provided it means halting the rush and allowing for discussion.
2024-04-30
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Third Session, Plenary Session.
There is not enough data.
2024-04-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The speaker refers supportively to colleague Jaak Valge, who likewise criticized the state of parliamentarism. Information regarding cooperation or willingness to compromise with the coalition is absent; the style remains largely oppositional, highlighting the system's failure.
2024-04-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, information briefing
The speaker emphasized the necessity of international cooperation within the NATO framework (JEF, B9) and questioned whether Estonia’s US policy is aimed at both sides (bipartisan). This points to a desire for a broad-based and strategically robust foreign policy.
2024-04-16
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Data is limited.
2024-04-03
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The speaker's style is formal yet demanding, requesting that the presenters (e.g., Mr. Randpere) comment and elaborate. There is no information regarding cooperation, willingness to compromise, or a cross-party coalition.
2024-04-01
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
Insufficient information
2024-03-20
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, press briefing.
The speaker supports international cooperation, stressing the need to time the processing of the sanctions law to coincide with the formation of a more collective position, citing the principle of "never again alone." Domestically, reference is made to the shared concerns of opposition MPs (including EKRE) regarding the risks of the draft bill, which suggests a willingness to cooperate on certain issues.
2024-03-18
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Not enough data
2024-03-12
15th Riigikogu, 3rd plenary sitting
The style of cooperation is pragmatic, indicating that the Estonian Conservative People's Party is effectively executing the Internal Security Service's mandate to improve the legislation. There is no reference to seeking compromises with either intra-coalition partners or other parliamentary factions concerning this draft legislation. Collaboration is restricted solely to the presentation of their own faction's initiative.
2024-03-11
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
Not enough data
2024-02-21
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
There is not enough data.
2024-02-13
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
Not enough data.
2024-02-07
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting.
The speaker is a highly collaborative legislative initiator, having presented the bill together with colleagues (Leo and Henn) and taking the time to thank others (Kert Kingo, Mart Helme) for their contribution. He/She collectively takes responsibility for an error found in the explanatory memorandum, showing a clear willingness to cooperate and admit mistakes. He/She asks colleagues to support the draft legislation.
2024-01-24
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The style of collaboration is open and inclusive, directly addressing all colleagues to secure support for the draft proposal. This indicates a desire to achieve broad-based approval and consensus regarding the specific legislative initiative.
2024-01-22
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
There is no data available regarding domestic cooperation. Internationally, the speaker recommends actively seeking advice from the Polish government on road construction, thereby demonstrating an openness to adopting foreign best practices.
2024-01-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The speaker addresses the minister respectfully ("Dear Minister"), but firmly demands answers and the implementation of necessary measures. The available data does not allow for an assessment of openness to compromise or cross-party cooperation.
2024-01-16
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The speaker expresses a desire for cross-factional cooperation, proposing that "our factions" should be able to approach security agencies to ensure awareness of security aspects. This indicates a willingness to share crucial security information across party lines.
2024-01-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
A shared position is demonstrated with colleague Jaak Valge regarding healthy life years and pensions, referencing certain internal cooperation. There is no information regarding broad-based or cross-party cooperation or readiness for compromise. The speaker poses questions independently, demanding answers from the Prime Minister.