Session Profile: Ants Frosch
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session.
2024-05-08
Political Position
The political stance is heavily focused on national security and strengthening defense capabilities. The speaker firmly supports expanding the powers of the Defense Forces Intelligence Center, deeming the government's opposition irresponsible and a disregard for the needs of the servicemen themselves. This position is strongly value-driven and underscores the urgency of the current crisis.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates expertise regarding the legislation of security institutions and the mandates of intelligence agencies, citing specific bill numbers and their legislative history. He/She relies directly on the position of the Head of the Defense Forces Intelligence Center (Colonel Ants Kiviselg) that the law is necessary during a crisis.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is impassioned, decisive, and militant, employing strong emotional appeals to underscore the significance of the bill and the irresponsibility of the government's actions. The speaker uses powerful phrases such as "criminal negligence" and concludes by paraphrasing the ancient Roman maxim ("Carthage must be destroyed") to stress their point.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
These patterns of activity demonstrate persistent and repetitive legislative action when submitting the same bill, indicating a readiness to resubmit it even in the event of failure. The speaker attended a session of the Special Committee for the Supervision of Security Agencies, where they received information from the Chief of the Defence Forces Intelligence Centre.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The primary opponents are the Government of the Republic and officials from the Ministry of Defence, whose stance is deemed irresponsible and indicative of a failure to grasp the significance of the draft legislation. Criticism is intense and centers on political negligence, as the government is delaying the necessary legal amendment under the pretext of conducting further analysis.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The style of cooperation is strongly intra-factional, emphasizing close collaboration with colleagues (Ants Frosch, Leo Kunnas, Alar Laneman) when repeatedly submitting the same draft legislation. The speaker mentions that it was specifically he, along with Leo and Alar, who "pushed hard for" the bill to be brought back into deliberation.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
Insufficient data
1 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Insufficient data.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Instead of social issues, the speaker is focusing on national security, strongly advocating for increased capabilities for intelligence and counter-intelligence agencies. The goal is to ensure the Defence Forces Intelligence Centre is equipped with the necessary instruments to operate effectively in a crisis situation.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is on amending the Security Authorities Act (Bill 330) to grant the Defence Forces Intelligence Centre rights similar to those held by the Internal Security Service and the Foreign Intelligence Service. The speaker is a repeated initiator and staunch proponent of this bill, who vows to continue its processing until it is adopted.
1 Speeches Analyzed