Agenda Profile: Ants Frosch
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Income Tax Act (177 SE)
2024-02-07
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting.
Political Position
His political position is clearly supportive of the draft bill amending the Income Tax Act (177 SE), which he himself submitted. Although he urges support for the bill, his address primarily focuses on correcting procedural and technical errors, thereby emphasizing the professionalism of the Riigikogu's work. The stance is more policy-driven and centered on the quality of the legislative process.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates detailed knowledge of the bill's text and the accompanying explanatory memorandum, highlighting a specific clerical error (in place of "dividends") and an unrealistic effective date (January 1, 2024). Their expertise is focused more on the technical correctness and procedures of legislation, rather than on deep economic theory.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is courteous and formal, incorporating mild self-criticism ("due to my inexperience") and apologizing for taking up the chamber's time. The speech is logical and focuses on technical details, stressing the necessity of correcting errors so that the work of the Riigikogu (Estonian Parliament) will appear professional to future readers as well.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker is an active proponent of legislation, noting that the draft bill was introduced as early as May 13th. He points out that the processing of the bill has been protracted and slow, contradicting the general perception of swiftness currently held in the chamber.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
There is no direct confrontation with specific political groups. The criticism is aimed more at the procedural shortcomings in the handling of the draft bill (e.g., regarding the committee's work and the effective date), rather than at substantive opponents.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The speaker works in cooperation with colleagues, naming Leo and Hennu as co-initiators of the bill. He/She jointly accepts responsibility for an error found in the explanatory memorandum ("this is truly my, Leo's, and Hennu's mistake").
1 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
Not enough data
1 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
The economic standpoints are related to the amendments to the Income Tax Act, directly referencing the regulation concerning the taxation of dividends. A specific position regarding the goals of tax policy (e.g., distribution vs. growth) remains unclear due to the lack of substance provided in the draft bill.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Not enough data
1 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is on amending the Income Tax Act (Draft 177 SE), which he initiated and supports. He stresses the technical correctness of the legislative process, pointing out an impossible effective date and the necessity of correcting typos in the explanatory memorandum.
1 Speeches Analyzed