By Plenary Sessions: Mart Võrklaev

The rhetorical style employed during the debate is supportive and appreciative of the minister, yet simultaneously ironic and critical concerning the opposition's past proposals. Irony is utilized (with a reference to "glowing screens"), and a logical, evidence-based approach is stressed. The address is formal, concluding with a specific political question regarding future priorities.

The rhetorical style is highly aggressive, confrontational, and accusatory. Strong and emotional language is employed, labeling the opposition's actions as a "blatant lie" and "frivolous posturing." The appeal is aimed at undermining the opposing party's credibility, rather than focusing on logical argumentation.