By Plenary Sessions: Mart Võrklaev

The speaker's style is formal, factual, and procedural, focusing on the neutral conveyance of legislative progress and committee decisions. The emphasis is on logical argumentation and facts, especially when referencing budget calculations and consensus amendments. The tone is rather mediating and explanatory.

The rhetorical style is critical, analytical, and concerned, highlighting the complex situation of the state's finances. The speaker employs logical appeals, focusing on the lack of transparency and substantive deficiencies in the opposition's proposal. The tone is formal and direct, encompassing both criticism and a call for Isamaa to rectify its budget.

The rhetorical style is formal, procedure-centric, and at times defensive, focusing on the committee’s rules of procedure and protocols. He has repeatedly been forced to defend his actions and reject accusations of lying or evasion. He uses the repeated phrase regarding the lack of substantive debate in the committee to avoid answering detailed policy questions in the plenary hall.