By Plenary Sessions: Mart Võrklaev

The rhetorical style is formal, analytical, and substantive, focusing on the economic impact of political decisions. The tone is laudatory and balanced when describing the activities of the Bank of Estonia, but cautious and questioning regarding the risks associated with fiscal policy. Logical arguments are employed, and specific legislative initiatives are referenced, concluding on a positive, even cheerful, note with the topic of Sipsik.

The rhetorical style is formal, courteous, and appreciative, expressing gratitude to the presenter and commending the Financial Supervisory Authority for its "excellent work." The address is structured as a logical and detailed question, seeking specific information regarding the processes of implementing the law and its market impact.

The style is formal, explanatory, and authoritative, centering on logical arguments and the political necessity of protecting depositors. The speaker answers questions directly, employing technical language and citing examples where risks have materialized (bankruptcies, loss of funds).