By Plenary Sessions: Mart Võrklaev

The speaker is active during the plenary sessions of the Riigikogu, participating in the debate on the central bank's report and referencing recent legislative actions. Mention is made of their involvement in the expert council established by the Economic Affairs Committee for the preparation of the report on improving the competitiveness of Estonian businesses. Furthermore, the conclusion of debates on draft legislation (such as the regulation of savings and loan associations) last week is also noted.

Lack of data

The speaker is actively involved in the legislative process, representing the Finance Committee before the plenary session and participating in the committee's consensus decisions. Mention is made of participation in the committee meeting on June 10th, as well as earlier meetings with credit unions in the speaker's role as minister.

Insufficient data.

Active participation in plenary sessions, presenting the Finance Committee's reports for the conclusion of the second reading of two finance-related bills. This operational pattern involves managing the legislative process and scheduling the final votes (e.g., June 18, 2025).

The speaker's primary pattern of activity is related to the legislative process and committee work, having been appointed as the rapporteur for the Finance Committee. This activity involves summarizing the content and decisions of the committee meeting (May 6) and presenting them at the plenary session (May 20).

Insufficient data.

Insufficient data

The speaker is an active member of the Finance Committee, presenting the results of the committee's deliberations to the plenary session and having been appointed as the representative for the lead committee. He/She manages the legislative timetable, noting, for instance, the tightness of the June 1st deadline and the May 7th deadline for stakeholder engagement.

The speaker's pattern of activity demonstrates active participation in the work of the Finance Committee, presenting detailed reports on the committee sessions (March 11 and 25) and the positions developed. He/She addresses the Riigikogu plenary session to explain the procedural aspects of the Chancellor of Justice's proposal and the committee's consensus decision.

The speaker is active in the plenary session as the rapporteur for the Finance Committee, presenting the committee's decisions and the details of the discussion. This pattern of activity indicates a focus on the committee's work and the communication of its results, referencing the recent committee meeting (on March 25) and tomorrow's debate.

The speaker's mode of operation involves active participation in the work of the Finance Committee and presenting as a rapporteur during the plenary session. He/She provides detailed information regarding the committee meeting (March 25) and the results of the vote. Furthermore, he/she actively participates in the plenary debate, responding to points of personal mention and specific accusations.

The speaker actively participates in the work of the State Budget Control Special Committee, where he has attended sessions concerning Nordica and questioned former government members, including Urmas Reinsalu. He also attempted to summon the then-Prime Minister Jüri Ratas to the committee meeting.

The data available covers only one plenary session, during which two short speeches were delivered on the topic of banking taxation.

The speaker actively participates in the plenary session, repeatedly raising questions during the first reading of the bill. This pattern demonstrates a focus on the progress and timeline of the legislation, demanding a swift resolution.

This constitutes active participation in the plenary session debate, involving both the posing of questions to the rapporteur and the delivery of longer statements of position, including requests for additional time to present one's arguments. All these interventions are related to the proceedings concerning one specific draft bill.

The rapporteur is actively involved in the legislative process, presenting the draft bill during its second reading at the plenary session. He/She provides an overview of the committee's work and sets the subsequent timelines, such as scheduling the final vote for December 4th.

There is too little data.

The operational modalities are linked to the role of the rapporteur for the Steering Committee, a position requiring detailed accountability regarding the procedural timeline and decisions, with specific reference to dates (e.g., September 17, October 21). He/She noted an overseas assignment that necessitated a change in the scheduling of the draft bill's discussion. He/She stresses that he/she is always prepared to discuss these topics, both in public forums and privately, one-on-one.

Insufficient data.

There is too little data.

The speaker is actively involved in legislative work, serving as a representative and rapporteur for the Finance Committee before the Riigikogu plenary assembly. This pattern of activity involves summarizing detailed committee sessions (held on September 9), documenting the participation of ministry officials, and establishing procedural deadlines (such as October 8).

There is not enough data.