Agenda Profile: Varro Vooglaid
Report by the Chancellor of Justice on the compliance of legal instruments with the Constitution and the performance of other duties imposed on the Chancellor of Justice by law.
2024-09-17
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
Political Position
The political position is strongly oriented towards defending the constitution, emphasizing the preservation of the Riigikogu’s decision-making authority regarding the use of the Defense Forces, and the inviolability of citizens’ property. The speaker sharply criticizes laws that, in their estimation, are clearly contrary to the constitution, and calls into question the political independence of the Chancellor of Justice. The focus is on ensuring constitutionality and supervising the activities of institutions.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates profound knowledge of constitutional law and legislative procedures, citing specific sections (§ 128 and § 32) and legislative bill numbers (317 SE, 332 SE). The expertise is focused on the procedures for the constitutional review of legal acts and the limits of the Riigikogu’s decision-making authority.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is direct, critical, and accusatory, raising sharp questions regarding the Chancellor of Justice's inaction and potential yielding to political pressure. The appeals are primarily logical and legal, relying on specific laws and provisions of the Constitution. The tone is formal and demanding.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker has been active in legislative oversight processes over the past year, having petitioned the Chancellor of Justice twice with a request to initiate constitutional review proceedings. This indicates regular and determined activity in highlighting constitutional violations.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The main criticism is directed at the Chancellor of Justice, who is accused of failing to initiate proceedings and of succumbing to possible political pressure. Furthermore, laws adopted by the Riigikogu (317 SE and 332 SE) are being opposed due to their conflict with the constitution, especially concerning the delegation of decision-making power and the alienation of property.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
Insufficient data.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is strictly on national and constitutional issues, addressing the Riigikogu's decision-making authority regarding the use of the Defence Forces and regulations governing the alienation of property. There is no regional focus.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Economic perspectives focus on the robust protection of private property, opposing Act (332 SE), which permits the expropriation of assets without just and immediate compensation. This underscores the constitutional requirement for fair compensation and safeguards the fundamental principles of property rights.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Insufficient data.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is on challenging the constitutionality of the enacted laws (317 SE and 332 SE). The speaker is the initiator in requesting the commencement of constitutional review, focusing on the regulations governing the delegation of decision-making authority regarding the use of the Defence Forces and the alienation of property.
1 Speeches Analyzed