By Months: Peeter Ernits

The speaker was extremely active during one specific sitting day (October 6, 2025), repeatedly posing questions and making interruptions directed at various ministers (Finance, Internal Affairs). He/She also references his/her own unusually active participation in previous committees. The overall pattern demonstrates significant involvement in debates and a clear willingness to speak on a wide range of different topics.

The speaker is exceptionally active in the Riigikogu sessions, appearing almost every day of debate in September. He/She refers to personal visits (the Elva drone crater, the Iisaku plant nursery, the Palamuse fair) and meetings with the heads of various institutions (notaries, judicial enforcement officers, the Academy of Sciences). He/She criticizes the ministers for taking time off during the crisis, emphasizing his/her own continuous work and presence.

The speaker is highly active in Riigikogu sessions, taking the floor almost every session day in June. They referenced their participation in the Rural Affairs Committee, meetings with beekeepers, and discussions with the Chancellor of Justice in the working group dedicated to making the State Budget more understandable. This demonstrates active involvement both in committee work and in wider political debates.

The speaker is highly active in the Riigikogu, repeatedly submitting interpellations to the Prime Minister and various ministers, and engaging in detailed debates. Furthermore, they are capable of reacting swiftly to current events. For example, over the weekend, they successfully intervened to halt the destruction of spruce seedlings at the Iisaku nursery by communicating directly with the head of the RMK and the minister.

The speaker is highly active in the Riigikogu in April 2025, participating intensively in debates almost every day the body is in session. They note that they have returned to the Riigikogu after a two-year absence. Their pattern of activity is focused on constantly questioning and criticizing the government and the rapporteurs, centering specifically on time wastage and the substantive impact of the draft legislation.