Agenda Profile: Peeter Ernits
Draft law amending the Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Prevention Act and the International Sanctions Act (640 SE) – third reading
2025-06-19
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Political Position
Strong opposition to the fast-tracking of the bill (640 SE), particularly the conducting of two readings within a single week. This stance is value-based, stressing that the draft legislation poses an extreme danger to the Estonian rule of law and the state itself. Criticism is also aimed at the poor quality of the legislation ("junk laws") and the violation of established procedures.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
Knowledge of parliamentary procedure is demonstrated, emphasizing the unprecedented speed and referring to the president's potential remittal of the bill. The specific term "superdatabase" is used in connection with the Anti-Money Laundering Act, and one is able to distinguish ordinary lawmaking from the declaration of martial law.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The tone is urgent and combative, expressing "great concern" and labeling the laws as dangerous and unprecedented. Dramatic comparisons are employed (hybrid attack, declaration of martial law) along with rhetorical questions to highlight the impropriety and inefficiency of the procedure.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speakers are actively participating in the critical third reading, criticizing the parliament's rapid pace of work and the necessity of wasting time on extraordinary sessions during the summer recess. One speaker raises the issue of their personal email being attacked, which points to active communication with voters and activists.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
Criticism is directed against the government/majority, which is rushing dangerous laws through, thereby endangering the rule of law and creating "shoddy legislation." The opposition is both substantive (the super database) and procedural (the speed of the readings). One speaker also criticizes external activists who are suspected of engaging in a hybrid attack aimed at paralyzing the work of the Riigikogu.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
Not enough data
3 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is exclusively on national legislative and security issues, addressing problems concerning the Estonian rule of law and the operational organization of the Riigikogu. Not enough data
3 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Not enough data
3 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
A speaker raises the topic of the "chicken rights activists," suspecting that their activism, in the form of email attacks, is actually a hybrid attack designed to cripple the work of the Riigikogu. This links social activism with the issues of security and parliamentary functionality.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The main priority is opposing the draft legislation (640 SE) amending the Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Prevention Act. Criticism is primarily directed at the bill’s rushed procedure, the resulting threat this poses to the rule of law, and the creation of a "super database."
3 Speeches Analyzed