Agenda Profile: Jaak Aab
Draft law amending the Competition Act and, in consequence, amending other laws (609 SE) - second reading
2025-06-10
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.
Political Position
The Speaker clearly supports the adoption of the administrative procedure for transposing the Competition Directive, drawing on the experience of other EU member states. He expresses moderate criticism of the current draft proposal, stressing that the directive should not be an end in itself; rather, the substance is what matters—specifically, how competition operates in the market and how it is monitored.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates a good understanding of competition law and the transposition of European Union directives. He uses technical terms such as administrative procedure, civil court, and administrative court, although he honestly acknowledges the limits of his legal expertise. His questions are specific and based on a comparison with the practices of other member states.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The speaker's style is polite and formal, utilizing traditional forms of address such as "Esteemed Chair" and "Respected Minister." They pose questions in a constructive tone, acknowledging the limits of their knowledge and seeking clarification. The rhetoric is fact-based rather than emotional, focusing on specific procedural issues.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
There is not enough data.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The Speaker expresses moderate criticism toward the Competition Authority, citing the potential for the emergence of "arbitrary action." He/She also questions Ministry of Justice officials, highlighting contradictions between their statements made before the committee and those made outside of it. The criticism is procedural rather than personal.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The Speaker demonstrates a willingness to cooperate by acknowledging the Competition Authority's proposals for amending the law. He emphasizes that the goal is not to impose heavy fines, but rather to work collaboratively with businesses to eliminate violations. His approach is constructive and geared toward finding a compromise.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
There is not enough data.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
The Speaker supports a business-friendly approach, emphasizing collaboration with entrepreneurs rather than imposing fines. He views the operation of market competition as a crucial element, which signals his support for a market economy. His position is that regulation must be simple, clear, and transparent.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
There is not enough data.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The speaker is focusing on the draft amendment to the Competition Act, scrutinizing its alignment with the relevant European Union directive and comparing it against the transposition practices observed in other member states. Furthermore, he is an active questioner, seeking detailed clarifications regarding both the bill's drafting process and the necessary consultations with the European Commission.
2 Speeches Analyzed