Second reading of the Draft Act amending the Building Code and other Acts (Acceleration of the Deployment of Renewable Energy) (308 SE)
Session: 15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
Date: 2024-05-15 19:47
Participating Politicians:
Total Speeches: 264
Membership: 15
Agenda Duration: 3h 17m
AI Summaries: 264/264 Speeches (100.0%)
Analysis: Structured Analysis
Politicians Speaking Time
Politicians
Analysis
Summary
The Riigikogu debated the second reading of Bill 308, the Act amending the Building Code and other acts (acceleration of the deployment of renewable energy), initiated by the Government of the Republic. Mario Kadastik, the rapporteur for the Economic Affairs Committee, explained that the bill’s objective is to reduce bureaucracy and speed up the processing of renewable energy projects by consolidating several permit procedures into one for offshore wind farms. By the deadline for amendments, 238 proposals were submitted, the majority of which originated from the EKRE faction. Opposition representatives (Andres Metsoja, Mart Maastik, Aivar Kokk, Helle-Moonika Helme) sharply criticized the bill, highlighting conflicts between environmental protection and planning (e.g., the restoration of the Lavassaare bog), and also expressed concern over the high cost of the projects and the potential increase in network tariffs. Coalition representatives emphasized that the priority development of renewable energy constitutes an overriding public interest, which will help reduce energy scarcity and lower electricity prices. Helle-Moonika Helme repeatedly submitted requests for recesses and votes on almost all amendments proposed by EKRE, all of which were rejected by the coalition's votes. The committee fully adopted 9 amendments, including one proposal by Varro Vooglaid. Finally, EKRE's proposal to terminate the second reading was also rejected.
Decisions Made 4
Recommendations of the Economic Affairs Committee regarding the amendments to Bill 308, which received consensus support or a majority vote:
Amendment proposal No. 2 (Economic Affairs Committee) was fully adopted.
Amendment proposal No. 20 (Varro Vooglaid) was fully adopted.
Amendment proposal No. 37 (Economic Affairs Committee) was fully adopted.
Amendment proposal No. 46 (Economic Affairs Committee) was fully adopted.
Amendment proposal No. 58 (Economic Affairs Committee, essentially replacing No. 57) was fully adopted.
Amendment proposal No. 64 (Economic Affairs Committee) was fully adopted (43 in favor, 5 against).
Amendment proposal No. 77 (Economic Affairs Committee) was fully adopted (47 in favor, 1 against).
All remaining amendments proposed by the EKRE faction (Nos. 1, 3–19, 21–36, 38–45, 47–56, 59–63, 65, 68–76, 78–79) were disregarded.
The motion by the faction of the Estonian Conservative People's Party to suspend the second reading of draft bill 308 was rejected (6 votes in favor, 43 opposed).
The second reading of Bill 308 was concluded.
Most Active Speaker
Helle-Moonika Helme (EKRE, right-wing) was by far the most active, calling for a vote on nearly every amendment submitted by EKRE and repeatedly taking 10-minute recesses, employing obstructionist tactics to delay the bill's proceedings.
Aseesimees Jüri Ratas
AI Summary
Ratas announced that the seventh item on the agenda is the second reading of Draft Act 308 concerning amendments to the Building Code and other acts (acceleration of renewable energy), and invited Mario Kadastik, a member of the Economic Affairs Committee, to the podium to deliver the report.
Mario Kadastik
Profiling Fraktsiooni mittekuuluvad Riigikogu liikmedAI Summary
During the second reading, 308 amendments to the draft act on accelerating the deployment of renewable energy were discussed, the majority of which were adopted by consensus. It was decided to place the draft act on the plenary session agenda on May 15, conclude the second reading, and hold the final vote on May 28.
Aseesimees Jüri Ratas
AI Summary
Deputy Speaker Jüri Ratas thanked the rapporteur, stated that there were no questions, opened the floor for debate, and invited Andres Metsoja to the rostrum.
Andres Metsoja
Profiling Isamaa fraktsioonAI Summary
Andres Metsoja cites the example of Pärnu County, where, alongside the utilization of designated renewable energy areas, private and EU funding has been allocated to the very same area for bog restoration. Furthermore, various institutions have signed off on the development, which creates a dissonance between the ideas of nature conservation, the green corridor, and reducing bureaucracy, and the actual interests involved.
Aseesimees Jüri Ratas
AI Summary
He asks for three minutes.
Andres Metsoja
Profiling Isamaa fraktsioonAI Summary
I am convinced that nature conservation and industry are not easily compatible, and planning must provide clarity and perspective, striving to fully exhaust its entire land potential while consistently steering decisions toward the interests of nature conservation.
Aseesimees Jüri Ratas
AI Summary
The Deputy Speaker thanks [the previous speaker] and asks Mart Maastik to take the floor from the Riigikogu rostrum.
Mart Maastik
Profiling Fraktsiooni mittekuuluvad Riigikogu liikmedAI Summary
The organization Landscape asserts that the draft bill aims to accelerate the environmental impact assessment through a new permit category, but the Saaremaa offshore wind farm project is detrimental to nature and taxpayers. It would be prudent, instead, to first develop onshore wind farms (e.g., Lavassaare) and avoid the expensive and environmentally damaging interconnection with Latvia via Saaremaa.
Aseesimees Jüri Ratas
AI Summary
Deputy Speaker Jüri Ratas requested three minutes.
Mart Maastik
Profiling Fraktsiooni mittekuuluvad Riigikogu liikmedAI Summary
Maastik expresses criticism against the so-called 'climate mantra' and the creation of the Ministry of Climate, emphasizing the need to thoroughly consider long-term environmental risks, the decommissioning costs of offshore wind farms, and the impact of microplastics, and stressing that swift actions must not be taken without thorough investigation and prudent, sustainable deliberation.
Aseesimees Jüri Ratas
AI Summary
Deputy Speaker Jüri Ratas thanked [him] and invited Igor Taro to the podium, reminded [the assembly] of the Rules of Procedure Act, and noted that everyone is permitted to take the floor during the second reading.
Igor Taro
AI Summary
Igor Taro stressed that for Eesti 200, the development of renewable energy constitutes an overriding public interest, and the purpose of this draft legislation is to reduce electricity prices and household costs in the coming years, while simultaneously ensuring a balance between nature protection and environmental effects.
Aseesimees Jüri Ratas
AI Summary
The Deputy Speaker gives thanks and invites Aivar Kok to the Riigikogu rostrum as the next speaker.
Aivar Kokk
Profiling Isamaa fraktsioonAI Summary
Aivar Kokk points out that electricity generated from oil shale was not the primary cause of the price hike. Instead, prices increased mainly due to developments in the Estonian electricity grid, cross-border transmissions at the Latvian-Estonian border, and factors tied to the price of gas. He also urges discussion of all production options and ensuring that the final consumer does not bear the cost of the entire network fee, emphasizing a focus on a controllable, domestic electricity generation solution.
Aseesimees Jüri Ratas
AI Summary
Deputy Chairman Jüri Ratas simply made a request: "Please!"
Aivar Kokk
Profiling Isamaa fraktsioonAI Summary
During his presentation, Aivar Kokk stated that gas turbines and biogas could offer a rapid green solution. He stressed the importance of conducting essential analyses concerning the impacts of nuclear energy and the integration of wind and solar power, and questioned the source of funding for the green transition, noting that the current government lacks a long-term strategy.
Aseesimees Jüri Ratas
AI Summary
Deputy Speaker Jüri Ratas now invited Helle-Moonika Helme to the Riigikogu podium.
Helle-Moonika Helme
Profiling Eesti Konservatiivse Rahvaerakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
Helle-Moonika Helme claims that offshore wind farms are the result of green ideology and lobbying by big businessmen, which sacrifices the interests of nature and local communities, and that the electricity generated will not benefit Estonia, but will instead go to foreign investors.
Aseesimees Jüri Ratas
AI Summary
He asks the listeners if they are sure.
Helle-Moonika Helme
Profiling Eesti Konservatiivse Rahvaerakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
Helle-Moonika Helme confirms affirmatively that she is present and ready.
Aseesimees Jüri Ratas
AI Summary
Deputy Speaker Jüri Ratas asks, "And how much?"
Helle-Moonika Helme
Profiling Eesti Konservatiivse Rahvaerakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
He says the presentation lasts three minutes.
Aseesimees Jüri Ratas
AI Summary
Deputy Speaker Jüri Ratas requests three minutes.
Helle-Moonika Helme
Profiling Eesti Konservatiivse Rahvaerakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
Helle-Moonika Helme accuses the government of leading Estonia into hundreds of billions in payments and general poverty through giant renewable energy projects, destroying the environment, natural resources, and the living environment. She cited videos showing the suffering of birds and protected animals and, on behalf of the EKRE faction, called for the interruption of the second reading of the draft legislation.
Aseesimees Jüri Ratas
AI Summary
Jüri Ratas concluded the negotiations on Bill 308, returned the document unsigned, and called for cooperation in reviewing the proposed amendments, clarifying that proposals 1, 3, 4, and 5 would be disregarded, while proposal 2 must be fully adopted; Amendment No. 5. Helle-Moonika Helme, you have the floor!
Helle-Moonika Helme
Profiling Eesti Konservatiivse Rahvaerakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
He will certainly call for a vote on this proposal, and before that, he will take a ten-minute break.
Aseesimees Jüri Ratas
AI Summary
Deputy Speaker Jüri Ratas called a ten-minute recess.
Aseesimees Jüri Ratas
AI Summary
Ratas announced that the recess has ended and is putting to a vote Rain Epler’s fifth amendment proposal, which the leading committee recommends rejecting, asking everyone to take a position and cast their vote.
Aseesimees Jüri Ratas
AI Summary
The result was 7 in favor, 50 against, and there were no abstentions. Amendment Proposal No. 6 was submitted by Siim Pohlak and Jaak Valge, and the responsible committee recommends that it be disregarded.
Helle-Moonika Helme
Profiling Eesti Konservatiivse Rahvaerakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
He/She thanks and requests, while this opportunity still exists, that we be able to vote on it and take a ten-minute break before the vote.
Aseesimees Jüri Ratas
AI Summary
Deputy Speaker Jüri Ratas thanks [the assembly] and announces a ten-minute recess.
Aseesimees Jüri Ratas
AI Summary
Jüri Ratas announces the end of the recess, puts Amendment Proposal No. 6 (Siim Pohlak and Jaak Valge) up for a vote, and informs the chamber that the lead committee recommends rejecting it, asking everyone to cast their vote.
Aseesimees Jüri Ratas
AI Summary
Amendment No. 7 failed to gain support (6 votes for, 50 against, with no abstentions), and the lead committee decided to reject it; Helle-Moonika Helme, please!
Helle-Moonika Helme
Profiling Eesti Konservatiivse Rahvaerakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
He/She thanked them and said that the amendment should be put to a vote, and that they should take a ten-minute recess beforehand.
Aseesimees Jüri Ratas
AI Summary
Deputy Speaker Jüri Ratas thanks the assembly and announces that the break will last ten minutes.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
Esteemed Riigikogu, the recess requested by the EKRE faction has concluded, and I now put amendment proposal No. 7 to a vote, which the lead committee recommends rejecting. Please take a position and cast your vote.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
The proposal did not receive support (5 in favor, 50 against; there were no abstentions), and subsequently, amendment proposal No. 8, presented by Varro Vooglaid, is submitted, which the leading committee recommends rejecting.
Helle-Moonika Helme
Profiling Eesti Konservatiivse Rahvaerakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
He is requesting a vote on this amendment and is taking a ten-minute recess before that.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
The Chairman thanks [the body] and declares a ten-minute recess at the request of the EKRE faction.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
Chairman Lauri Hussar announced that the ten-minute recess requested by the EKRE faction had concluded, and he was now putting amendment No. 8 to a vote, which the leading committee recommends rejecting.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
The Riigikogu voted on the proposal, with 6 in favor and 51 against, and it failed to gain support; this was followed by Amendment No. 9, submitted by Leo Kunnas, Siim Pohlak, and Alar Laneman, which the lead committee recommends rejecting.
Toomas Uibo
Profiling Eesti 200 fraktsioonAI Summary
Toomas Uibo, on behalf of the Eesti 200 faction, requested a recess, saying that they needed to discuss it, but one minute would suffice.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
The Chairman invites Helle-Moonika Helme to take the floor.
Helle-Moonika Helme
Profiling Eesti Konservatiivse Rahvaerakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
Helle-Moonika Helme said she didn't know why Toomas Uibo took a recess, and that she herself hadn't wanted a recess, but simply wanted to request a vote.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
He raises a question about the procedure for conducting the session and addresses Anti Haugas.
Anti Haugas
Profiling Fraktsiooni mittekuuluvad Riigikogu liikmedAI Summary
Anti Haugas suggested considering ending the recess at some point, citing the EKRE faction members' statements that the amendments are genuinely obstructionist.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
Chairman Lauri Hussar said that the board hopes to quickly process the draft bill. Toomas Uibo proposed a one-minute recess, and Helle-Moonika Helme said, "Alright," adding, "I will take two procedural questions."
Helle-Moonika Helme
Profiling Eesti Konservatiivse Rahvaerakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
Helle-Moonika Helme asks whether Anti Haugas's proposal was democratic or contained totalitarian elements.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
The Chairman stated that the issue raised does not yet concern the procedure for conducting the session, and requested Mart Helme to ask a question about it.
Mart Helme
Profiling Eesti Konservatiivse Rahvaerakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
Mart Helme proposed removing the Reform Party from the chamber, claiming it is a criminal organization.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
Chairman Lauri Hussar said that he could not consider it a procedural matter and granted a one-minute recess at the request of the Eesti 200 faction.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
Chairman Lauri Hussar announced that the one-minute recess had ended and put to a vote amendment proposal No. 9, which the leading committee wishes to disregard.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
The proposal received 6 votes in favor and 51 against, with no abstentions, and therefore failed to gain support; following this, amendment proposal No. 10, submitted by Evelin Poolamets and Alar Laneman, is presented, regarding which the leading committee holds the position that it should be disregarded.
Helle-Moonika Helme
Profiling Eesti Konservatiivse Rahvaerakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
He/She asks you to vote in favor of this amendment.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
The Chair invites the members to proceed to the vote on Amendment Proposal No. 10 and announces that the lead committee’s position is to reject it, asking everyone to take a stand and cast their vote.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
The Riigikogu decided that the motion received 6 votes in favor, 51 against, with no abstentions; it was not supported. Next up is Amendment Proposal No. 11, presented by Rene Kokk, which the lead committee recommends rejecting.
Helle-Moonika Helme
Profiling Eesti Konservatiivse Rahvaerakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
Helle-Moonika Helme asks you to vote for this amendment.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
Chairman Lauri Hussar called Amendment No. 11 for a vote and announced that the lead committee wished to disregard it.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
The Riigikogu voted on the proposal: 6 in favor, 52 against, and there were no abstentions, meaning the proposal failed to gain support; next, amendment proposal No. 12 from Rain Epler was submitted, which the lead committee wishes to disregard. Helle-Moonika Helme, please proceed.
Helle-Moonika Helme
Profiling Eesti Konservatiivse Rahvaerakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
Thank you! The coalition's resolve is being praised, but to test it once again, he/she is nevertheless putting the amendment to a vote.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
Chairman Lauri Hussar put amendment proposal No. 12 to a vote and referred to the leading committee’s position to reject it.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
The proposal received 6 votes in favour, 51 against, and there were no abstentions; it was not adopted. Next, Amendment Proposal No. 13, submitted by Jaak Valge, will be presented. The lead committee is of the opinion that it should be disregarded. Helle-Moonika Helme, please proceed.
Helle-Moonika Helme
Profiling Eesti Konservatiivse Rahvaerakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
He/She requests that this amendment be put to a vote.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
The Chairman called the vote and introduced Amendment No. 13, which the leading committee recommends rejecting.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
The motion received 6 votes in favor, 48 against, with no abstentions, and thus failed to gain support; this was followed by Amendment No. 14, which the responsible committee decided to reject, and Helle-Moonika Helme then asked to speak.
Helle-Moonika Helme
Profiling Eesti Konservatiivse Rahvaerakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
He thanks the Chair and requests a vote on this amendment.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
Chairman Lauri Hussar announced that he would put amendment No. 14, which the lead committee recommends rejecting, up for a vote, and asked his colleagues to take a position.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
The motion received 6 votes in favor, 49 against, with zero abstentions; it failed to pass. Next is Amendment Proposal No. 15, submitted by Leo Kunnas, which the steering committee recommends rejecting.
Helle-Moonika Helme
Profiling Eesti Konservatiivse Rahvaerakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
He/She thanks the Chair and requests that this amendment be put to a vote.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
Chairman Lauri Hussar put Amendment No. 15 to a vote, noting that the leading committee recommends rejecting it.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
The proposal was not supported (6 in favor, 49 against, no abstentions); next is Amendment Proposal No. 16, submitted by Varro Vooglaid, which the lead committee recommends rejecting; Helle-Moonika Helme, please.
Helle-Moonika Helme
Profiling Eesti Konservatiivse Rahvaerakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
He/She requests a vote on this amendment.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
Chairman Lauri Hussar called colleagues to vote, putting Amendment Proposal No. 16 up for a vote. He informed them that the lead committee recommended rejecting the proposal and asked the participants to state their position and cast their ballots.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
The proposal received 6 votes in favor, 49 against, and zero abstentions, and was therefore not adopted; next up is Amendment No. 17, submitted by Mart Helme and Helle-Moonika Helme, which the lead committee recommends rejecting. Helle-Moonika Helme, please!
Helle-Moonika Helme
Profiling Eesti Konservatiivse Rahvaerakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
Helle-Moonika Helme requests a vote on this amendment.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
Chairman Lauri Hussar called his colleagues to a vote and submitted Amendment No. 17, which the leading committee had recommended rejecting.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
The proposal received 6 votes in favor, 48 against, with no abstentions. It failed to gain support, and Amendment No. 18, submitted by Alar Laneman, was consequently disregarded from the leading committee's standpoint.
Helle-Moonika Helme
Profiling Eesti Konservatiivse Rahvaerakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
He/She thanks the Chair and nonetheless asks that they vote on the very good amendment.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
Chairman Lauri Hussar calls Amendment No. 18 up for a vote, stressing that the leading committee wishes to reject it.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
The proposal received 6 votes in favor and 47 against, with no abstentions, and consequently failed to gain support; next is Amendment No. 19, submitted by Jaak Valge, which the leading committee recommends rejecting.
Helle-Moonika Helme
Profiling Eesti Konservatiivse Rahvaerakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
Helle-Moonika Helme requests a vote on this amendment, and prior to that, she is taking a ten-minute recess.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
Chairman Lauri Hussar expresses his thanks and announces, at the request of the EKRE faction, that a ten-minute recess will be called.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
Chairman Lauri Hussar announces that the ten-minute recess of the EKRE faction has ended, and he is putting amendment proposal No. 19 to a vote, which the lead committee recommends rejecting.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
The result of the vote was 5 in favor, 45 against, and zero abstentions; the proposal failed to gain support. Next up is amendment proposal number 20, submitted by Varro Vooglaid, and the leading committee's position is to reject it.
Helle-Moonika Helme
Profiling Eesti Konservatiivse Rahvaerakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
He/She thanks the Chair and colleagues and requests a vote on this amendment.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
Chairman Lauri Hussar asks Priit Lomp to pose a question regarding the procedure for conducting the session.
Priit Lomp
AI Summary
He noted that a colleague, the lead rapporteur on the committee, believes the Speaker of the Riigikogu may have misread the count, and asked Mario Kadastik to quickly verify whether that figure of 20 is correct. We supported Varro’s proposal in the committee, marking the first time in history that such an action has occurred during this specific parliamentary term.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
Chairman Lauri Hussar offered his thanks and highlighted Mario Kadastik's question concerning the procedure for conducting the session.
Mario Kadastik
Profiling Fraktsiooni mittekuuluvad Riigikogu liikmedAI Summary
The speaker stated that Amendment No. 20 should receive the full support of the committee, and the committee did indeed support the proposal.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
The Chair announced that the committee fully supports the proposal and the lead committee is of the view that Varro Vooglaid’s proposal should be fully taken into account, and subsequently asked Helle-Moonika Helme if she wished to put it to a vote.
Helle-Moonika Helme
Profiling Eesti Konservatiivse Rahvaerakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
Helle-Moonika Helme said that in that case, we wouldn't vote for it.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
The announcement states that the 20th amendment proposal will not be put to a vote, and we will proceed with the 21st amendment proposal (submitted by Kert Kingo), which the lead committee recommends rejecting.
Helle-Moonika Helme
Profiling Eesti Konservatiivse Rahvaerakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
Helle-Moonika Helme expresses her thanks, noting that this amendment proposal did not make history and the committee failed to take it into account, but she nevertheless requests that the amendment be put to a vote here.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
Chairman Lauri Hussar presented Amendment Proposal No. 21, announced that the leading committee wished to disregard it, and called upon his colleagues to take a position and vote.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
The motion received 8 votes in favor, 45 against, and there were no abstentions; it failed to find support, and subsequently, amendment proposal No. 22, submitted by Alar Laneman, is presented, which the lead committee recommends should be disregarded.
Helle-Moonika Helme
Profiling Eesti Konservatiivse Rahvaerakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
He/She thanks the Chair and requests a vote on this amendment.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
The Chairman calls for a vote on Amendment Proposal No. 22, which the lead committee recommends rejecting.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
The motion received six votes in favor, forty-six against, with no abstentions, and was therefore not supported; we now move to amendment proposal number 23, submitted by Evelin Poolamets, which the responsible committee recommends rejecting. Helle-Moonika Helme, you have the floor.
Helle-Moonika Helme
Profiling Eesti Konservatiivse Rahvaerakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
He/She requests that the linked amendment be put to a vote, as members of the Riigikogu can vote in favor of it if they support one of the related amendments.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
The Chairman called for a vote on Amendment No. 23, which the responsible committee recommends rejecting.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
The proposal received 6 votes in favor, 47 against, and there were no abstentions; it failed to gain support, and the next item to be addressed is amendment proposal No. 24, submitted by Rene Kokk, which the lead committee recommends disregarding.
Helle-Moonika Helme
Profiling Eesti Konservatiivse Rahvaerakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
Helle-Moonika Helme thanks the assembly and requests a vote on this amendment.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
Chairman Lauri Hussar called for a vote and submitted Amendment Proposal No. 24, regarding which the responsible committee recommends disregarding the position, and asked everyone present to take a stance and cast their vote.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
The motion received 6 votes in favor, 47 against, with no abstentions, meaning it failed to gain support; next is Amendment Proposal No. 25, submitted by Arvo Aller, which the lead committee recommends rejecting.
Helle-Moonika Helme
Profiling Eesti Konservatiivse Rahvaerakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
Helle-Moonika Helme thanks the Chair and requests a vote on this amendment.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
Speaker Lauri Hussar calls his colleagues to the vote and puts Amendment Proposal No. 25 up for a vote, noting that the lead committee recommends rejecting it.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
The motion failed to pass (6 in favor, 47 against); this was followed by Amendment No. 26, submitted by Jaak Valge, which the lead committee decided not to take into consideration, and Helle-Moonika Helme has been invited to address the floor.
Helle-Moonika Helme
Profiling Eesti Konservatiivse Rahvaerakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
He thanks the Chair and requests a vote on this amendment.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
Chairman Lauri Hussar called his colleagues to vote on Amendment No. 26, noting that the lead committee recommends rejecting the proposal.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
The proposal failed to gain support (6 in favor, 46 against; there were no abstentions), and regarding the next amendment proposal, No. 27, submitted by Alar Laneman, Mart Helme, and Helle-Moonika Helme, the Lead Committee decided to disregard it.
Helle-Moonika Helme
Profiling Eesti Konservatiivse Rahvaerakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
He/She requests a vote on this amendment.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
Chairman Lauri Hussar thanked all colleagues, called for the vote, and announced the submission of amendment No. 27, noting that the lead committee wished to disregard it, and asked everyone to take a position and vote.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
The proposal received 6 votes in favor, 46 against, and there were zero abstentions, and therefore it failed to gain support; next, Amendment Proposal No. 28, submitted by Arvo Aller, will be presented, which the lead committee recommends rejecting. Helle-Moonika Helme, please.
Helle-Moonika Helme
Profiling Eesti Konservatiivse Rahvaerakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
He thanks the Chair and requests a vote on this amendment.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
Chairman Lauri Hussar called his colleagues to a vote and presented Amendment Proposal No. 28, which the leading committee wishes to disregard.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
The proposal received 6 votes in favor, 48 against, and there were no abstentions, and therefore it did not find support. Next, Amendment Proposal No. 29, submitted by Kert Kingo and Varro Vooglaid, was presented, which the leading committee recommends rejecting.
Helle-Moonika Helme
Profiling Eesti Konservatiivse Rahvaerakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
He/She thanks the Chair, notes that we are making good progress, and asks for a vote on this amendment.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
Chairman Lauri Hussar called his colleagues to vote, submitted Amendment No. 29, and stated the lead committee's position that it should be rejected, subsequently asking them to take a stand and cast their votes.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
6 in favor, 47 against, with no abstentions; the proposal failed to gain support. Next, Amendment Proposal No. 30, submitted by Rain Epler, was presented, which the lead committee recommends rejecting.
Helle-Moonika Helme
Profiling Eesti Konservatiivse Rahvaerakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
He requests a vote on this amendment and calls a ten-minute recess before it.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
The Chairman announced that a ten-minute recess would be taken at the request of the EKRE faction.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
Chairman Lauri Hussar declared the recess requested by the EKRE faction concluded, put Amendment Proposal No. 30 to a vote, and announced that the leading committee recommends rejecting it.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
The proposal received 6 votes in favor and 41 against and failed to gain support; this was followed by amendment proposal No. 31 from Rene Kokk, which the leading committee decided to disregard; Helle-Moonika Helme, you have the floor!
Helle-Moonika Helme
Profiling Eesti Konservatiivse Rahvaerakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
He/She thanks the presiding officer and requests a vote on this amendment.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
Chairman Lauri Hussar asks [us] to take a position and vote on amendment No. 31, which the leading committee proposes to leave unconsidered.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
The proposal received 6 votes in favor, 39 against, and there were no abstentions, meaning it failed to gain support; next up is Amendment Proposal No. 32, submitted by Leo Kunnas, which the lead committee recommends rejecting; Helle-Moonika Helme, please.
Helle-Moonika Helme
Profiling Eesti Konservatiivse Rahvaerakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
Helle-Moonika Helme thanked the Chair and requested the vote on this amendment.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
Chairman Lauri Hussar called his colleagues to a vote and presented Amendment Proposal No. 32, which the leading committee wishes to disregard.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
The proposal received 6 votes in favor, 40 against, with no abstentions, and therefore failed to gain support; this was followed by amendment proposal No. 33, submitted by Jaak Valge, which the responsible committee recommends not taking into consideration.
Helle-Moonika Helme
Profiling Eesti Konservatiivse Rahvaerakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
Helle-Moonika Helme requests a vote on this amendment.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
Chairman Lauri Hussar called his colleagues to vote on Amendment No. 33 and announced that the leading committee wished to disregard it.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
The result of the vote was 6 in favor, 40 against, with no abstentions, meaning the proposal failed to gain support; this was followed by Amendment No. 34 from Rain Epler, which the lead committee recommends rejecting, and Helle-Moonika Helme is invited to the floor.
Helle-Moonika Helme
Profiling Eesti Konservatiivse Rahvaerakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
He thanks them and requests that this amendment be voted upon.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
Speaker Lauri Hussar calls upon his colleagues to vote, introduces Amendment No. 34, and highlights the responsible committee's recommendation to reject it, asking everyone to take a position and cast their vote.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
The proposal failed to gain support (6 in favor, 40 against). This was followed by Amendment No. 35, submitted by Rene Kok, which the lead committee decided to disregard.
Helle-Moonika Helme
Profiling Eesti Konservatiivse Rahvaerakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
The speaker thanks the Chair, notes that the outlook is promising and dissenting votes are steadily decreasing, and requests a vote on this amendment.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
The Chair called the colleagues to the vote and submitted Amendment No. 35, which the leading committee recommends should be rejected.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
The motion was defeated (6 votes in favor, 40 against, 1 abstention). This is followed by Amendment No. 36, submitted by Mart Helme and Helle-Moonika Helme, which the lead committee recommends rejecting.
Helle-Moonika Helme
Profiling Eesti Konservatiivse Rahvaerakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
Helle-Moonika Helme thanks the Chair and wishes to vote on this amendment.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
Chairman Lauri Hussar asks if they may proceed to the vote, submits amendment no. 36 for a vote, and informs the assembly that the lead committee recommends not taking it into account, subsequently asking everyone to take a position and cast their vote.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
The motion received 6 votes in favor, 42 against, with no abstentions, and therefore failed to gain support; next, Amendment Proposal No. 37 (submitted by the Economic Affairs Committee) will be addressed, and the lead committee's position is to fully take it into account; Helle-Monika Helme, please.
Helle-Moonika Helme
Profiling Eesti Konservatiivse Rahvaerakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
He/She thanks the Chair for giving him/her the floor and announces that he/she will put this amendment to a vote.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
Chairman Lauri Hussar called upon his colleagues to vote on Amendment No. 37, asking them to state their position and cast their vote.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
The motion was supported (46 in favor, 2 against, with no abstentions). Next, Amendment Proposal No. 38, submitted by Arvo Aller, will be presented, and the lead committee recommends rejecting it.
Helle-Moonika Helme
Profiling Eesti Konservatiivse Rahvaerakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
He thanks the Chair and requests a vote on this amendment.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
Chairman Lauri Hussar put amendment proposal No. 38 to a vote, announced that the leading committee wished to disregard it, and asked the participants to take a position and vote.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
The proposal received 6 votes in favor, 42 against, and zero abstentions, and consequently failed to gain support; this is followed by amendment proposal No. 39, submitted by Evelin Poolamets, and the lead committee's position is to disregard it.
Helle-Moonika Helme
Profiling Eesti Konservatiivse Rahvaerakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
He/She thanks you, Mr./Madam Chair, and requests a vote on this amendment.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
Chairman Lauri Hussar called Amendment No. 39 to a vote and announced that the steering committee wished to disregard it, asking his colleagues for their stance and their vote.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
The motion received 6 votes in favor and 43 against, with no abstentions, and therefore failed to gain support. This was followed by Amendment Proposal No. 40, concerning the submitters Mart Helme and Helle-Moonika Helme, which the steering committee decided to disregard.
Helle-Moonika Helme
Profiling Eesti Konservatiivse Rahvaerakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
He/She thanks the Chair and requests a vote on this amendment, calling a ten-minute recess to discuss it with Mart Helme.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
Chairman Lauri Hussar gives thanks and, at the request of the EKRE faction, declares a ten-minute recess.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
It was announced in the Riigikogu that the ten-minute recess requested by the EKRE faction has ended, and amendment No. 40, which the leading committee wishes to disregard, will be put to a vote.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
The proposal received 6 votes in favor, 39 against, and 1 abstention, and was consequently not supported; this is followed by amendment proposal No. 41, submitted by Kert Kingo, which the lead committee wishes to disregard.
Helle-Moonika Helme
Profiling Eesti Konservatiivse Rahvaerakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
He thanks the presiding officer and requests that this amendment be put to a vote.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
Chairman Lauri Hussar called for a vote on amendment proposal No. 41, which the leading committee recommends be disregarded.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
The proposal received 6 votes in favor and 40 against and was therefore rejected; next, Amendment Proposal No. 42, submitted by Rene Kokk, will be presented, which the leading committee recommends rejecting.
Helle-Moonika Helme
Profiling Eesti Konservatiivse Rahvaerakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
He asks for a vote on this amendment.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
Chairman Lauri Hussar requests proceeding to a vote on Amendment Proposal No. 42, even though the leading committee recommends rejecting it.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
The motion received 6 votes in favor, 40 against, and zero abstentions, meaning it failed to gain support. Next, Amendment Proposal No. 43, submitted by Leo Kunnas, will be presented, and the lead committee recommends rejecting it. Helle-Moonika Helme, please.
Helle-Moonika Helme
Profiling Eesti Konservatiivse Rahvaerakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
He/She thanks [the body] and requests a vote on this amendment.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
Chairman Lauri Hussar announced that he would put amendment proposal No. 43 up for a vote, noting that the responsible committee wished to reject it, and asked his colleagues to take a stand and vote.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
The proposal received 6 votes in favor, 41 against, and there were no abstentions, and consequently, it failed to gain support; this is followed by amendment proposal No. 44 (Kunnas and Vooglaid), which the lead committee wishes to disregard; Helle-Moonika Helme, please.
Helle-Moonika Helme
Profiling Eesti Konservatiivse Rahvaerakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
He thanks the Chair and asks for this amendment to be put to a vote.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
Chairman Lauri Hussar asks the chamber to take a position and vote on amendment No. 44, which the leading committee recommends rejecting.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
The proposal received only 6 votes in favor and 41 against, with no abstentions, and therefore failed to gain support. Next up is Amendment No. 45, submitted by Jaak Valge, which the lead committee recommends rejecting.
Helle-Moonika Helme
Profiling Eesti Konservatiivse Rahvaerakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
He thanks you and requests a vote on this amendment.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
Chairman Lauri Hussar announces that amendment proposal No. 45 will be put to a vote, and since the leading committee recommends that it be disregarded, he asks [the assembly] to take a position and vote.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
The motion received 6 votes in favor and 41 against, with no abstentions, and was therefore rejected; next, we will proceed to consider Amendment Proposal No. 46, for which the position of the lead committee must be fully taken into account.
Helle-Moonika Helme
Profiling Eesti Konservatiivse Rahvaerakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
He requests that this amendment be put to a vote.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
Chairman Lauri Hussar announced that he would allow the vote to proceed and was putting amendment proposal No. 46 to the vote, emphasizing that the position of the leading committee must be fully taken into account, and asked members to take a stand and cast their votes.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
Forty-three people voted in favor of the motion, two were against, and there were no abstentions; next, we will introduce Amendment Proposal No. 47, submitted by Rene Kokk, and the lead committee recommends rejecting it.
Helle-Moonika Helme
Profiling Eesti Konservatiivse Rahvaerakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
He thanks the body and requests a vote on this amendment.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
Chairman Lauri Hussar asked whether the vote could commence, presented Amendment Proposal No. 47, and announced the leading committee’s position that it should be disregarded, requesting that the body take a stance and proceed to a vote.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
The proposal received 6 votes in favor, 41 against, and zero abstentions, thus failing to gain support; next up for consideration is amendment proposal No. 48, submitted by Leo Kunnas, which the leading committee recommends disregarding.
Helle-Moonika Helme
Profiling Eesti Konservatiivse Rahvaerakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
Helle-Moonika Helme requests that this amendment be put to a vote.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
Chairman Lauri Hussar requested leave to begin the vote. He then presented Amendment Proposal No. 48 and announced the leading committee's position to disregard it, asking the participants to take a stand and cast their vote.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
The proposal received 6 votes in favor, 40 against, and 1 abstention, and thus failed to gain support; next, amendment proposal No. 49, submitted by Evelin Poolamets, will be presented, which the leading committee recommends rejecting.
Helle-Moonika Helme
Profiling Eesti Konservatiivse Rahvaerakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
He/She thanks [the body] and requests a vote on this amendment.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
Chairman Lauri Hussar asks if we may proceed to the vote, and puts Amendment No. 49 to the vote, noting that the responsible committee wishes to reject it, and calls upon [members] to take a position and vote.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
Voting result: the proposal received 6 votes in favor, 41 against, and there were no abstentions, and consequently it did not find support; this was followed by amendment proposal No. 50, submitted by Kert Kingo, which the leading committee wishes to disregard; Helle-Moonika Helme, please.
Helle-Moonika Helme
Profiling Eesti Konservatiivse Rahvaerakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
He/She thanks the Chair and requests a vote on this amendment.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
Chairman Lauri Hussar calls the vote, introduces Amendment No. 50, and presents the leading committee's position regarding its rejection, while simultaneously requesting that a stance be taken and the vote proceed.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
The proposal received 6 votes in favor, 40 against, with no abstentions, and therefore failed to gain support; this is followed by amendment proposal No. 51 (submitted by Rene Kokk and Leo Kunnas), which the lead committee recommends rejecting, and Helle-Moonika Helme is invited to speak.
Helle-Moonika Helme
Profiling Eesti Konservatiivse Rahvaerakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
He requests a vote on this amendment.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
The Chair called for a vote, and Amendment No. 51 was introduced, which the leading committee recommends rejecting. Members were asked to state their position and vote.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
The proposal received 6 votes in favor and 41 against, with no abstentions, and thus failed to gain support. Next, amendment proposal No. 52 was submitted by Arvo Aller, but the lead committee wishes to disregard it.
Helle-Moonika Helme
Profiling Eesti Konservatiivse Rahvaerakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
He thanked the Chair and requested a vote on Amendment No. 52.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
Chairman Lauri Hussar announces that amendment proposal No. 52, which the leading committee recommends be disregarded, will be put to a vote, and he asks [members] to take a position and cast their votes.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
The motion received 6 votes in favor, 41 against, and there were no abstentions; consequently, it failed to gain support. Next up is Amendment Proposal No. 53, which the lead committee recommends rejecting, and Helle-Moonika Helme is invited to take the floor.
Helle-Moonika Helme
Profiling Eesti Konservatiivse Rahvaerakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
He thanks them and wants to put this amendment to a vote.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
Chairman Lauri Hussar asks if we can proceed to the vote, presents Amendment Proposal No. 53, and announces that the leading committee recommends rejecting it, asking members to take a position and cast their vote.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
The motion received 6 votes in favor, 41 against, and zero abstentions; consequently, it failed to gain support. This was followed by Amendment No. 54, submitted by Kert Kingo, which the responsible committee recommends dismissing. Finally, Helle-Moonika Helme was invited to address the floor.
Helle-Moonika Helme
Profiling Eesti Konservatiivse Rahvaerakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
He thanks the Chair and requests a vote on this amendment.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
The Chairman called for a vote, presented Amendment No. 54, and announced that the leading committee recommended rejecting it, asking the participants to take a position and vote.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
The proposal received 6 votes in favor and 41 against, with no abstentions, and consequently failed to gain support. This was followed by Amendment No. 55, which the lead committee recommends disregarding.
Helle-Moonika Helme
Profiling Eesti Konservatiivse Rahvaerakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
He thanks the Chair, acknowledges that the point is hardly original, but nonetheless requests that this amendment be put to a vote.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
Chairman Lauri Hussar asks leave to proceed to the vote, submits Amendment Proposal No. 55, and requests that a position be taken and the matter voted upon, noting that the leading committee wishes to disregard it.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
The result of the vote was 6 in favor, 41 against, and there were no abstentions, meaning the proposal failed to gain support; this is followed by Amendment Proposal No. 56, submitted by Rene Kokk, which the lead committee recommends rejecting.
Helle-Moonika Helme
Profiling Eesti Konservatiivse Rahvaerakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
He thanks them and requests that this amendment be put to a vote.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
Chairman Lauri Hussar asks if the vote may begin, introduces Amendment No. 56, and announces that the leading committee recommends rejecting it, requesting that members take a position and cast their vote.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
The proposal received 6 votes in favor, 41 against, and no abstentions, and consequently failed to gain support; this was followed by amendments No. 57 (Arvo Aller), which was considered substantively, and No. 58 (Economic Affairs Committee), which was considered fully, regarding which the lead committee has taken a position, and Helle-Moonika Helme requested the floor.
Helle-Moonika Helme
Profiling Eesti Konservatiivse Rahvaerakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
Helle-Moonika Helme expresses her thanks and states that she wishes to vote on this amendment.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
Chairman Hussar puts Amendment No. 58 to a vote and asks colleagues to take a position and cast their votes, emphasizing that the position of the leading committee must be fully taken into account.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
46 members of the Riigikogu supported the proposal, with no votes against or abstentions recorded; this was followed by amendment proposal No. 59, submitted by Arvo Aller, which the leading committee decided not to take into account.
Helle-Moonika Helme
Profiling Eesti Konservatiivse Rahvaerakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
Since Arvo Aller's proposal received such strong support, I also request a vote on this amendment.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
The Chairman puts Amendment Proposal No. 59 to a vote, noting that the lead committee recommends its rejection, and calls upon the Chamber to take a position and vote.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
The proposal received 6 votes in favor and 41 against; there were no abstentions, and consequently, it failed to gain support. Amendment No. 60 was submitted by Rain Epler, and the lead committee recommends rejecting it. Helle-Moonika Helme, please!
Helle-Moonika Helme
Profiling Eesti Konservatiivse Rahvaerakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
Thank you, Mr. Chair. Rain Epler always makes excellent proposals, and therefore, I wish to vote in favor of this amendment.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
Chairman Lauri Hussar asks if the voting can commence, submits Amendment Proposal No. 60, and announces that the lead committee wishes to disregard it, then requests that a position be taken and the vote cast.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
The proposal received 6 votes in favor and 42 against, with no abstentions, and therefore failed to gain support. Amendment No. 61 was disregarded, as the lead committee recommended against its adoption.
Helle-Moonika Helme
Profiling Eesti Konservatiivse Rahvaerakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
He/She thanks the Chair and asks colleagues to vote on the amendment.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
Chairman Lauri Hussar asks whether we may proceed to the vote, introduces Amendment Proposal No. 61, and notes the leading committee's position that it should be disregarded, subsequently asking members to take a position and cast their votes.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
Six in favor, 42 against, and no abstentions, meaning the proposal failed to gain support; next, Amendment Proposal No. 62, submitted by Martin Helme, is presented, and the lead committee decides to disregard it; Helle-Moonika Helme, please!
Helle-Moonika Helme
Profiling Eesti Konservatiivse Rahvaerakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
He wants to put this amendment proposal to a vote.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
The Chairman calls for the vote and submits Amendment No. 62, which the leading committee recommends rejecting, asking members to take a position and cast their votes.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
The result was 6 in favour, 43 against, with no abstentions; Amendment Proposal No. 63 (submitted by Anti Poolamets) failed to gain support, and the lead committee decided to disregard it.
Helle-Moonika Helme
Profiling Eesti Konservatiivse Rahvaerakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
He thanks the Chair and announces his wish to vote on the amendment.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
Chairman Lauri Hussar puts amendment No. 63 to the vote and announces that the leading committee recommends its rejection, asking (members) to take a position and vote.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
The result was 6 in favor, 42 against, with no abstentions; next, amendment proposal No. 64, submitted by the Economic Affairs Committee, will be considered, regarding which the position of the leading committee must be fully taken into account.
Helle-Moonika Helme
Profiling Eesti Konservatiivse Rahvaerakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
He/She believes that European Union directives should not be adopted so quickly, and requests a vote on this amendment.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
The Chairman calls for the vote to begin, presents Amendment Proposal No. 64, and emphasizes that the position of the lead committee must be fully taken into account, and asks [members] to take a position and vote.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
Chairman Lauri Hussar announced that the proposal received 43 votes in favor and 5 against. This was followed by amendment proposal No. 65 from Rain Epler, which the lead committee recommends rejecting/disregarding. Helle-Moonika Helme, you have the floor!
Helle-Moonika Helme
Profiling Eesti Konservatiivse Rahvaerakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
Helle-Moonika Helme wants this amendment proposal to be voted on, despite the committee having disregarded it.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
Chairman Lauri Hussar wishes to commence the vote, submits Amendment Proposal No. 65, and announces the leading committee's position to disregard it, requesting that a stance be taken and a vote cast.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
The motion failed, receiving 6 votes in favor and 43 against, and was therefore not supported. Next up are amendments No. 66 and No. 67, submitted by the Economic Affairs Committee, which the lead committee recommends adopting in full. However, amendment No. 68, submitted by Rain Epler, must be disregarded. Helle-Moonika Helme, you have the floor.
Helle-Moonika Helme
Profiling Eesti Konservatiivse Rahvaerakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
He wants this amendment to be voted on.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
Chairman Lauri Hussar informs [the assembly] that he is putting amendment No. 68 to a vote, noting that the lead committee recommends rejecting it, and asks [members] to take a position and vote.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
The proposal received 6 votes in favor and 41 against, and therefore failed to gain support; next is Amendment No. 69 (Leo Kunnas), which the lead committee recommends rejecting; Helle-Moonika Helme, please!
Helle-Moonika Helme
Profiling Eesti Konservatiivse Rahvaerakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
Helle-Moonika Helme stated that even though the explanation deems Leo Kunnas's amendment proposals insincere, she wants that amendment to be put to a vote and evaluated.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
He called his colleagues to a vote, submitted Amendment Proposal No. 69, and said that the lead committee intended to disregard it.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
The motion received 6 votes in favor and 44 against, with no abstentions, and consequently failed to pass; this was followed by Amendment Proposal No. 70, submitted by Rain Epler, which the lead committee recommends rejecting.
Helle-Moonika Helme
Profiling Eesti Konservatiivse Rahvaerakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
He called for a vote on the amendment and simultaneously announced a ten-minute recess so that colleagues could catch their breath.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
The Chairman thanked [the attendees/previous speaker] and called a ten-minute recess at the request of the EKRE faction.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
Chairman Lauri Hussar announced that the recess requested by the EKRE faction had ended, and he is now putting amendment No. 70 to a vote, which the lead committee recommends rejecting.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
The proposal received 5 votes in favor, 39 against, and 2 abstentions, and consequently failed to pass; next, Amendment Proposal No. 71 (Alar Laneman) will be presented, which the lead committee recommends rejecting.
Helle-Moonika Helme
Profiling Eesti Konservatiivse Rahvaerakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
The speaker thanks the Chair and requests a vote on this amendment.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
Chairman Lauri Hussar announced that amendment proposal No. 71 would be put to a vote, and the leading committee recommends rejecting it, asking colleagues to take a position and cast their vote.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
The proposal received only 5 votes in favor and 41 against, and thus failed to gain support; following this, Amendment Proposal No. 72 was submitted by Rain Epler, which the leading committee decided not to consider.
Helle-Moonika Helme
Profiling Eesti Konservatiivse Rahvaerakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
He/She thanks the Chair and requests a vote on this amendment.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
Chairman Lauri Hussar called for the vote to commence and presented amendment proposal No. 72, which the leading committee recommends rejecting, asking members to take a position and vote.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
The result was 6 votes in favor and 40 against, and consequently, the proposal did not receive support. Next, we will consider Amendment No. 73, submitted by Alar Laneman, which the leading committee recommends rejecting.
Helle-Moonika Helme
Profiling Eesti Konservatiivse Rahvaerakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
He thanks you and asks that you vote in favor of this amendment.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
Chairman Lauri Hussar announced that the vote on amendment proposal No. 73 was being opened, and that the leading committee wished to disregard it.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
The Riigikogu decided that the proposal received 6 votes in favor and 41 against, and therefore failed to gain support. This was followed by amendment No. 74, submitted by Rain Epler, which the lead committee recommends rejecting.
Helle-Moonika Helme
Profiling Eesti Konservatiivse Rahvaerakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
He/She requests that this amendment be put to a vote.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
Chairman Lauri Hussar called for the vote to commence, putting Amendment Proposal No. 74 to a vote. He announced that the leading committee recommends rejecting it, asking (the members) to take a position and vote.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
The proposal failed to gain support, with a result of 6 in favor and 42 against. This was followed by Amendment No. 75, submitted by Alar Laneman, which the lead committee decided to disregard.
Helle-Moonika Helme
Profiling Eesti Konservatiivse Rahvaerakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
He/She thanks the Chair and requests a vote on this amendment.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
Chairman Lauri Hussar asks if we may proceed to the vote, submits Amendment Proposal No. 75, and notes that the lead committee wishes not to take it into account, subsequently requesting that a position be taken and a vote held.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
Chairman Lauri Hussar announced that the proposal received 6 votes in favor and 42 against, and thus failed to gain support. Next up is amendment proposal No. 76, submitted by Alar Laneman, and the leading committee's position is to reject it.
Helle-Moonika Helme
Profiling Eesti Konservatiivse Rahvaerakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
Helle-Moonika Helme thanks the presiding officer, quotes a classic author, and requests that this amendment be put to a vote.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
Chairman Lauri Hussar confirms that the progress is indeed good, calls for a vote, presents Amendment Proposal No. 76, and notes that the lead committee recommends rejecting it, asking everyone to take a stand and vote.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
The proposal failed to gain support (6 in favor, 42 against). Subsequently, Amendment Proposal No. 77 was submitted, which the leading committee recommends accepting in full.
Helle-Moonika Helme
Profiling Eesti Konservatiivse Rahvaerakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
He/She thanks the listeners and invites them to vote through this.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
Chairman Lauri Hussar wishes to put Amendment Proposal No. 77 to a vote, which the leading committee recommends fully adopting, requesting that members take a position and cast their vote.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
The proposal received approval with 47 votes in favor and 1 against; subsequently, Amendment Proposal No. 78, submitted by Evelin Poolamets, was presented, which the leading committee recommends rejecting. Helle-Moonika Helme, please proceed!
Helle-Moonika Helme
Profiling Eesti Konservatiivse Rahvaerakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
He thanks everyone and asks them to vote in favor of this amendment.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
Dear colleagues, we will now proceed to the vote. I am presenting Amendment No. 78, and the position of the leading committee is to disregard it. Please take a stand and vote.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
The Riigikogu voted on Amendment Proposal No. 79, submitted by Evelin Poolamets, with 6 votes in favor and 42 against, and the leading committee decided to reject it.
Helle-Moonika Helme
Profiling Eesti Konservatiivse Rahvaerakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
Helle-Moonika Helme states that despite the suggestion to disregard the matter, she nevertheless proposes that it should be put to a vote in the chamber.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
Chairman Lauri Hussar called his colleagues to the vote, submitted Amendment Proposal No. 79, and noted that the responsible committee wishes to disregard it.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
Chairman Lauri Hussar announced that following the review of all amendments, the proposal by the EKRE faction to suspend the second reading of Draft Bill 308 will now be put to a vote.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
The proposal received only 6 votes in favor and 43 against, meaning support was lacking, and the second reading of Draft Act 308 has been concluded.