First reading of the draft resolution of the Riigikogu, "Submitting a Proposal to the Government of the Republic" (630 OE)
Session: 15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Date: 2025-06-18 22:33
Total Speeches: 85
Membership: 15
Agenda Duration: 54m
AI Summaries: 85/85 Speeches (100.0%)
Analysis: Structured Analysis
Politicians Speaking Time
Politicians
Analysis
Summary
The 19th item on today's agenda concerned Draft Resolution 630 of the Riigikogu, "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic," submitted by the Social Democratic Party faction, which aimed to initiate the development of an anti-fraud action plan. The submitter of the draft, Anti Allas, emphasized that the volume and complexity of fraud (including investment scams, spoofing calls, and schemes created using artificial intelligence) have seen an explosive increase in Estonia, causing millions of euros in damage every year. He stressed the need for coordinated cooperation between the Ministry of Justice, the Ministry of Internal Affairs, law enforcement agencies, and the private sector (banks, telecoms) to better protect the people of Estonia and their livelihoods.
Valdo Randpere, representing the Legal Affairs Committee, presented the committee's position, stating that relevant activities (analyses, strategies, cooperation) are already underway by the relevant agencies. The committee expressed skepticism that a new national action plan would provide substantial added value to resolving the situation, deeming it instead ideological self-promotion and unnecessary bureaucracy. Randpere emphasized that the state should not be a "nanny" and that the solution lies in cooperation between law enforcement agencies and the private sector, along with awareness campaigns. Following a lengthy debate that covered both civic responsibility and the role of the state, the draft resolution was rejected at the first reading.
Decisions Made 1
The Riigikogu decided to reject, at the first reading, draft resolution 630 of the Riigikogu resolution "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic," which was submitted by the faction of the Social Democratic Party (18 in favor, 46 against, 0 abstentions).
Most Active Speaker
Anti Allas (Social Democratic Party, left-wing) served as the rapporteur for the draft bill and answered the majority of the questions, presenting his faction's position regarding the necessity of an anti-fraud action plan.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
Speaker Lauri Hussar opened the 19th item on the agenda, which concerned the first reading of draft Riigikogu decision 630, "Making a proposal to the Government of the Republic," submitted by the Social Democratic Party faction, and invited colleague Anti Allase to the rostrum to present the report.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
Chairman Lauri Hussar announced that today's 19th agenda item is the first reading of draft Riigikogu resolution 630, titled "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic," submitted by the Social Democratic Party faction, and invited colleague Anti Allas to the Riigikogu rostrum as the rapporteur.
Anti Allas
Profiling Fraktsiooni mittekuuluvad Riigikogu liikmedAI Summary
Anti Allas said that the faction of the Social Democratic Party will submit a draft resolution to the Riigikogu for the preparation of an anti-fraud action plan. The goal of this plan is, in cooperation with law enforcement, the Ministry of the Interior, the Ministry of Justice, the Information System Authority, and the financial and telecommunications sectors, to prevent and reduce increasingly widespread fraud, including investment scams, identity theft, and fake content created using artificial intelligence, and to protect people's assets and trust in the state.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
Chairman Lauri Hussar thanked the presenter, stated that the audience had questions, and called upon Tanel Kiik to ask them.
Tanel Kiik
Profiling Fraktsiooni mittekuuluvad Riigikogu liikmedAI Summary
Tanel Kiik asks the rapporteur for a forecast regarding the support for the draft bill, considering that fraud and cyber scams should be a priority issue for every politician.
Anti Allas
Profiling Fraktsiooni mittekuuluvad Riigikogu liikmedAI Summary
Anti Allas emphasized that this is a cooperation plan aimed at solving a problem that is causing great harm to the people of Estonia, and he believed that both the opposition and the coalition would provide enough votes of support.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
Chairman Lauri Hussar offers his thanks and invites Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart to take the floor.
Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart
Profiling Eesti Keskerakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
The report emphasizes that people's ability to cope has deteriorated, and they are increasingly falling victim to scam schemes that utilize artificial intelligence and even the voices of relatives. The question is also raised of how to fight against these schemes.
Anti Allas
Profiling Fraktsiooni mittekuuluvad Riigikogu liikmedAI Summary
Anti Allas emphasizes that the goal of the draft bill is to consolidate various agencies and the private sector and to create a flexible, fast, and regularly updated action plan for combating fraud.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
Chairman Lauri Hussar invited Heljo Pikhof to the stage.
Heljo Pikhof
Profiling Sotsiaaldemokraatliku Erakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
Heljo Pikhof considers the Government of the Republic's plan to develop an anti-fraud action plan highly commendable, emphasizing its crucial necessity due to the increasingly complex and widespread fraud schemes, which have victimized many of her close associates, and expresses hope that this plan will be able to improve the situation.
Heljo Pikhof
Profiling Sotsiaaldemokraatliku Erakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
Heljo Pikhof expressed her gratitude and confidence that drawing up an anti-fraud action plan is absolutely essential, noting that many people have relatives or loved ones who have fallen victim to scams—primarily through fake calls, identity theft, and romance fraud—and she asked whether the proposed bills would actually improve the situation.
Anti Allas
Profiling Fraktsiooni mittekuuluvad Riigikogu liikmedAI Summary
Central to this plan is coordinated outreach, which must not be a one-off event but must be integrated with various information channels and resources to ensure that different target groups receive the information.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
The Chairman called Andre Hanimägi to the stage.
Andre Hanimägi
Profiling Fraktsiooni mittekuuluvad Riigikogu liikmedAI Summary
Andre Hanimägi drew attention to the fact that the damage resulting from bank fraud and scams has increased severalfold this year, stressing the need for a national action plan that would coordinate efforts and send a clear message to society about the seriousness of the problem. He also questioned what the actual broader damage to society is when people lose their money, pushing back against the notion that everyone is solely responsible for themselves.
Andre Hanimägi
Profiling Fraktsiooni mittekuuluvad Riigikogu liikmedAI Summary
Andre Hanimägi noted that the losses from bank fraud this year are several times greater compared to the last two years, and a coordinated action plan would help demonstrate that the Estonian state is tackling the issue. However, he also asked how significant the broader damage is when a person loses their money — it’s not just financial harm, but something that affects the entire society.
Anti Allas
Profiling Fraktsiooni mittekuuluvad Riigikogu liikmedAI Summary
Anti Allas stresses that the extensive damage resulting from the fraud can marginalize people and inflict economic, social, and health harm. He urges the government to immediately and rapidly launch coordinated preliminary actions, rather than drawing up a multi-year action plan, in order to quickly bring relief to the people of Estonia.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
Chairman Lauri Hussar invites Züleyxa Izmailova to take the floor.
Züleyxa Izmailova
Profiling Fraktsiooni mittekuuluvad Riigikogu liikmedAI Summary
He raises concerns regarding the increasing amounts of money that our grandparents have lost, and asks whether the government has discussed this issue and how it might be possible to resolve this problem, identify and apprehend the perpetrators, so that the population would be protected.
Anti Allas
Profiling Fraktsiooni mittekuuluvad Riigikogu liikmedAI Summary
Anti Allas notes that although authorities have addressed the issue, there is no clear, comprehensive plan, and many people do not understand the rapid changes and may consequently face economic and social difficulties. Furthermore, he himself does not know exactly what the government is doing about the matter.
Vladimir Arhipov
Profiling Fraktsiooni mittekuuluvad Riigikogu liikmedAI Summary
Vladimir Arhipov submitted a question to the Riigikogu concerning which ministry should be responsible for advancing the apprehension of offenders and how cooperation between the Ministry of Justice and Digital Affairs and the Ministry of the Interior would function.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
Chairman Lauri Hussar calls upon Vladimir Arhipov to speak.
Vladimir Arhipov
Profiling Fraktsiooni mittekuuluvad Riigikogu liikmedAI Summary
Vladimir Arhipov continues the previous discussion, criticizing the ministers' vague answers regarding the progress made in catching perpetrators. He emphasizes that this inter-agency issue requires close cooperation between the Ministry of Justice and Digital Affairs and the Ministry of the Interior, and asks which ministry should ultimately take responsibility for it.
Anti Allas
Profiling Fraktsiooni mittekuuluvad Riigikogu liikmedAI Summary
Anti Allas compares school bullying to an anti-fraud action plan and emphasizes that if the state does not take it seriously and fails to implement a coordinated, high-priority plan, people will fall victim to it. Unfortunately, there may even be someone in this very hall who has already suffered.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
Chairman Lauri Hussar called Peeter Ernits to the stage.
Peeter Ernits
Profiling Fraktsiooni mittekuuluvad Riigikogu liikmedAI Summary
Peeter Ernits raises the question of how to ensure the caller is actually Lauri Läänemets or Kristen Michal, and not a fraudster using their voice.
Anti Allas
Profiling Fraktsiooni mittekuuluvad Riigikogu liikmedAI Summary
Anti Allas highlights the contrast between earlier, genuine crisis calls and today's suspicious phone scams, stressing that while one might listen to the call, it is crucial to take time before making any decision, and if the number is unusually long, the call should be terminated immediately.
Anti Allas
Profiling Fraktsiooni mittekuuluvad Riigikogu liikmedAI Summary
Anti Allas emphasizes that although previous calls from politicians have caused suspicion, and those specific incidents were not fraudulent, it is crucial to take time and listen before making any decision. He adds that if the number is very long, the call should be ended quickly.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
Chairman Hussar calls upon Madis Kallas.
Madis Kallas
Profiling Fraktsiooni mittekuuluvad Riigikogu liikmedAI Summary
Madis Kallas emphasizes that cyberattacks and scams in the digital world cause millions in losses for the people of Estonia—damages that could not have been foreseen 10–20 years ago. He also asks which ministries or agencies should be addressing this serious problem, given that the commission does not see the need to move forward in its current form.
Madis Kallas
Profiling Fraktsiooni mittekuuluvad Riigikogu liikmedAI Summary
Madis Kallas asks which ministries or who in Estonia should be dealing with cyberattacks and damages arising in the e-world, if the commission does not support moving forward in this form, even though people's damages are in the millions and include not only financial, but also other damages.
Anti Allas
Profiling Fraktsiooni mittekuuluvad Riigikogu liikmedAI Summary
Anti Allas stressed that the main question is whether the Government of the Republic will prioritize the issue and quickly draw up a viable action plan to resolve it, and he hopes that such a sound plan will materialize very soon.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
The Chairman called Lauri Läänemets onto the stage.
Lauri Läänemets
Profiling Sotsiaaldemokraatliku Erakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
Lauri Läänemets acknowledges the police's success stories in uncovering networks and halting fraud schemes, but he emphasizes the lack of resources amid rising crime and calls on the government and the Ministry of the Interior to clarify and ensure adequate funding for the police in the budget.
Anti Allas
Profiling Fraktsiooni mittekuuluvad Riigikogu liikmedAI Summary
Anti Allas stated that people lack a clear place and avenue to turn to with their concerns, and although the police have made progress, coordinated action is missing, and the difficulty in seeking help is significant. Furthermore, this is not possible without resources, and the action plan highlights the need for those resources.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
The Chairman thanked the rapporteur, confirmed that there were no questions, and asked Valdo Randpere, a member of the Legal Affairs Committee, to come to the Riigikogu podium and present the discussion that had taken place in the Legal Affairs Committee.
Valdo Randpere
Profiling Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
Valdo Randpere noted that although the number of frauds has increased and a national campaign does not directly reduce them, the solution will come from cooperation between law enforcement and the private sector, as well as through broad-based awareness campaigns, and the population is protected, but the scams are changing, and banks and the media must also be involved in their prevention.
Valdo Randpere
Profiling Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
Valdo Randpere reported on the Legal Committee’s discussion regarding the action plan against fraud, noting that although law enforcement agencies and the Ministry of Justice and Digital Affairs are actively addressing the growing problem of scams, he remains skeptical about the necessity and effectiveness of a national action plan. In his assessment, a national campaign will not contribute to reducing the number of frauds. Instead, the solution lies primarily in close cooperation between law enforcement and the private sector (especially banks) and targeted awareness campaigns, emphasizing that the state should not act as a babysitter trying to regulate every sector.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
Chairman Lauri Hussar thanked the rapporteur, noted that the number of questions had increased exponentially, and now invited Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart to take the questions.
Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart
Profiling Eesti Keskerakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
The presentation highlights the necessity of an awareness campaign for protection against fraudulent calls and provides examples of verification questions that can be used to distinguish an authentic call from Kristen Michal from a voice generated by artificial intelligence.
Valdo Randpere
Profiling Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
Valdo Randpere thanked Anastasia, noting that the given question had not been discussed in the committee, and referred to the proverb that fools must indeed be separated from their money, if someone he believes to be Kristen Michal calls him at night.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
Chairman Lauri Hussar called Andre Hanimägi to the stage.
Andre Hanimägi
Profiling Fraktsiooni mittekuuluvad Riigikogu liikmedAI Summary
Andre Hanimägi thanks the good speaker and Valdo Randpere, emphasizes that the action plan's goal is to get people thinking together and making things better, cites the anti-corruption plan as an example of expert work, and finally asks whether the discussion is ideological and whether the Social Democrats' bill is actually a necessary one.
Valdo Randpere
Profiling Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
Valdo Randpere emphasized that we have responsibility and freedom, and the state should not be put in the role of a babysitter, nor should we assume that the government's action plan will stop fraud, but it is crucial that information reaches people through the media.
Aseesimees Toomas Kivimägi
AI Summary
The address is aimed at inviting Züleyxa Izmailova.
Züleyxa Izmailova
Profiling Fraktsiooni mittekuuluvad Riigikogu liikmedAI Summary
He raises a question regarding the roles of responsibility between the state and the private sector, asking whether the state should be primarily responsible for protecting its citizens, and why the Reform Party seems to lean towards protecting thugs.
Valdo Randpere
Profiling Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
Valdo Randpere stressed that the use of cameras must be regulated through legislative amendments and clear rules, and that this must be done in collaboration with the private sector, the prosecutor's office, the police, and lawmakers, rather than within the scope of a national action plan.
Aseesimees Toomas Kivimägi
AI Summary
Vice-Chairman Toomas Kivimägi invites Lauri Läänemets to the stage.
Lauri Läänemets
Profiling Sotsiaaldemokraatliku Erakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
Lauri Läänemets emphasized that, in the opinion of the police, the state must address the issue, and the lack of resources and cooperation are the main challenges. He also asked whether the draft bill reflects the opinion of Estonian experts or merely the presenter's personal vision.
Lauri Läänemets
Profiling Sotsiaaldemokraatliku Erakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
Lauri Läänemets defends the bill, refuting the claim that the necessity of state intervention is based on a social democratic vision, and confirms that in reality, the Estonian police and experts in the field hold the view that private individuals and entrepreneurs cannot cope with the problem, and the state must act despite the lack of resources and cooperation issues, asking whether the speaker is presenting their personal opinion or the opinion of experts.
Valdo Randpere
Profiling Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
He explains the format of the discussion: the initiator submits the draft bill, then the representative of the committee reports on the content of the debate, and here he represents the Legal Committee, not himself or other experts.
Tiit Maran
Profiling Fraktsiooni mittekuuluvad Riigikogu liikmedAI Summary
Tiit Maran points out that the commission claimed that nothing can be achieved with action plans, but he believes that actual activities can make a difference. Furthermore, while education and the private sector won't solve every problem, the unanswered question for him was whether our state bodies possess sufficient capability to cope with complex frauds, and whether this issue has been discussed at all.
Aseesimees Toomas Kivimägi
AI Summary
Deputy Speaker Toomas Kivimägi invites Tiit Maran to speak.
Valdo Randpere
Profiling Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
Valdo Randpere stated that the Ministry of Justice and Digital Affairs released its strategy for combating fraud on the same day as the Legal Affairs Committee session. He noted that while state institutions are already addressing this issue, the question remains whether an additional national action plan would actually contribute anything further.
Aseesimees Toomas Kivimägi
AI Summary
Deputy Chairman Toomas Kivimägi requests the floor be given to Anti Allas.
Anti Allas
Profiling Fraktsiooni mittekuuluvad Riigikogu liikmedAI Summary
Anti Allas emphasized that cooperation and resources between private and public sector agencies are inadequate, and he asked what should be done without a unified plan and what an alternative solution would be.
Valdo Randpere
Profiling Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
Overall, the impression was not that nothing is being done or that a national action plan is needed. Quite the opposite: everyone is contributing, banks are operating diligently, and they are, in fact, the gatekeepers. Consequently, there was no need to seriously consider adopting this action plan.
Aseesimees Toomas Kivimägi
AI Summary
Deputy Chairman Toomas Kivimägi invites Vladimir Arhipov to speak.
Vladimir Arhipov
Profiling Fraktsiooni mittekuuluvad Riigikogu liikmedAI Summary
Vladimir Arhipov emphasized that Parliament must provide direction for the action plan because the ministers' responses are inadequate and the committee has rejected the draft bill, even though police operations are limited and delays in matters concerning the Ministry of Social Affairs indicate a need for swifter proceedings.
Valdo Randpere
Profiling Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
According to Valdo Randpere, the committee rejected the draft bill because it is primarily an ideological statement that adds bureaucracy while the relevant activities are already underway, and it doesn't actually contribute anything meaningful to the issue.
Aseesimees Toomas Kivimägi
AI Summary
Züleyxa Izmailova asked the presiding officer a question.
Züleyxa Izmailova
Profiling Fraktsiooni mittekuuluvad Riigikogu liikmedAI Summary
Züleyxa Izmailova asks if she is permitted to respond to the previous address, as the speaker mentioned her earlier.
Valdo Randpere
Profiling Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
The presentation highlights that we are missing this format.
Züleyxa Izmailova
Profiling Fraktsiooni mittekuuluvad Riigikogu liikmedAI Summary
He/She said he/she was concerned about protecting the population from crime and that officials are already addressing the issue, but stressed that increased activity will not bring the desired results without clear direction.
Aseesimees Toomas Kivimägi
AI Summary
Deputy Chairman Toomas Kivimägi thanked Züleyxa.
Züleyxa Izmailova
Profiling Fraktsiooni mittekuuluvad Riigikogu liikmedAI Summary
If the directives came from the legislator, it may emerge that they acted illegally, as is currently evident concerning these police cameras.
Aseesimees Toomas Kivimägi
AI Summary
Toomas Kivimägi thanked Züleyxa, noting that it was not procedural and that he had not interrupted initially due to the birthday, and then asked for Heljo Pikhof.
Heljo Pikhof
Profiling Sotsiaaldemokraatliku Erakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
Heljo Pikhof stressed that when people fall victim to fraud, pensioners or single parents can lose their last savings or end up in debt. They then seek social support from the local government and turn to a doctor because their mental health has begun to suffer, making the containment of fraud a matter of state concern.
Valdo Randpere
Profiling Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
Valdo Randpere stresses that people must retain a sense of responsibility and that a system should not be created where everyone who has lost money would be immediately compensated, even though the state and local governments are dealing with fraud, and furthermore, he does not share the enthusiasm regarding the necessary action plan.
Aseesimees Toomas Kivimägi
AI Summary
Deputy Chairman Toomas Kivimägi turned to Tanel Kiik and asked him.
Tanel Kiik
Profiling Fraktsiooni mittekuuluvad Riigikogu liikmedAI Summary
Tanel Kiik criticizes the presenter's appalling attitude towards victims of fraud and asks why a serious problem and a necessary initiative are being ridiculed.
Valdo Randpere
Profiling Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
Valdo Randpere emphasized that he was representing solely the official position of the Legal Affairs Committee, which dictates that the bill in question must be rejected during the first reading, pursuant to a decision adopted by a large majority. Furthermore, personal opinions hold no significance in this context.
Valdo Randpere
Profiling Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
Valdo Randpere stated that he is representing the views of the Legal Affairs Committee, and that the Committee decided to reject the draft legislation during the first reading. This decision was supported by a large majority, with only a few members opposing it.
Aseesimees Toomas Kivimägi
AI Summary
Toomas Kivimägi stated that there were no questions, proceeded to open the discussions, and clarified that reply statements are not provided for when there is a presentation by the commission.
Vladimir Arhipov
Profiling Fraktsiooni mittekuuluvad Riigikogu liikmedAI Summary
Vladimir Arhipov expressed indignation over the commission’s decision to reject a crucial draft bill, while simultaneously criticizing the state’s inaction in raising the low subsistence level (200 euros). This inaction, he argues, leaves people doubly vulnerable to both taxes and fraudsters. He demands that parliament demonstrate strong political will and establish a commission to set concrete deadlines for the government to solve these social problems. Furthermore, he stressed the importance of civic responsibility, calling on society (for example, through training sessions, such as those held in Maardu) to actively contribute to protecting the elderly from digital fraud.
Vladimir Arhipov
Profiling Fraktsiooni mittekuuluvad Riigikogu liikmedAI Summary
Vladimir Arhipov forcefully urged Parliament to demonstrate its resolve and accelerate the legislative procedure for the bill increasing the subsistence minimum. He stressed the importance of community assistance and civic responsibility, citing as examples the engagement of Maardu youth and the teaching of digital skills to the elderly to combat fraudsters.
Aseesimees Toomas Kivimägi
AI Summary
Toomas Kivimägi thanks you and requests that Andre Hanimägi represent the Social Democratic Party faction under the authority of the mandate.
Andre Hanimägi
Profiling Fraktsiooni mittekuuluvad Riigikogu liikmedAI Summary
Andre Hanimägi draws attention to the escalating wave of fraud, which is causing millions of euros in damage and has become particularly sophisticated with the use of AI. He criticizes the current fragmented approach, urgently calling for the establishment of a coordinated action plan at the Riigikogu (Parliamentary) level. This plan is needed to ensure broad cooperation and the necessary legislative amendments required to protect the people of Estonia. He stresses that the state cannot afford to stand idly by when facing a problem of this magnitude.
Andre Hanimägi
Profiling Fraktsiooni mittekuuluvad Riigikogu liikmedAI Summary
Scammers are getting increasingly sophisticated, and with the advent of AI, fraud can occur completely undetected. This is why we need a coordinated action plan that brings together ministries, the banking association, telecom companies, and relevant agencies to share best practices and, where necessary, legislation, in order to protect the public and put an end to the loss of millions of euros.
Aseesimees Toomas Kivimägi
AI Summary
Deputy Speaker Toomas Kivimägi asks for two additional minutes.
Andre Hanimägi
Profiling Fraktsiooni mittekuuluvad Riigikogu liikmedAI Summary
Andre Hanimägi calls for an end to the political tug-of-war and for the acknowledgment that fraud is a serious societal problem, not merely the responsibility of individuals. He stresses that the state's priority must be helping and protecting every person, especially those who lose their last savings, because a self-respecting state must not blame the victim. Instead, it must send a clear message that reducing fraud and ensuring the security of every citizen is paramount.
Andre Hanimägi
Profiling Fraktsiooni mittekuuluvad Riigikogu liikmedAI Summary
Addressing fraud as a societal issue, Hanimägi stressed that every individual is a priority and that reducing fraudulent activity remains our primary objective, even though no single action plan can resolve every concern.
Aseesimees Toomas Kivimägi
AI Summary
Toomas Kivimägi announced that the negotiations had concluded and no amendments were submitted. He further stated that, as proposed by the board, the final vote on Draft 630 would be held following the call to the hall. During this process, he put Draft 630 of the Riigikogu decision, titled “Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic,” submitted by the Social Democratic Party faction, to the final vote and asked his colleagues to cast their ballots.
Aseesimees Toomas Kivimägi
AI Summary
Bill 630 was rejected; 18 members of the Riigikogu voted in favor, 46 voted against, and there were 0 abstentions.
Aseesimees Toomas Kivimägi
AI Summary
Deputy Speaker Toomas Kivimägi announced the voting results, according to which Bill 630 was rejected in the Riigikogu by a clear majority (46 votes against, 18 for).