The content of politics

Session: 15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, press briefing.

Date: 2024-11-20 14:36

Total Speeches: 16

Membership: 15

Agenda Duration: 11m

AI Summaries: 16/16 Speeches (100.0%)

Analysis: Structured Analysis

Politicians Speaking Time

Politicians

Analysis

Summary

The present fourth question to the Riigikogu was directed at Prime Minister Kristen Michal and focused primarily on the substance of the government's policy and the budget policy associated with it. Initially, the structure of expenditures in the defense sector was discussed, along with the financing of ammunition and specialized equipment, including balancing previous promises with actual figures. The central theme was how expenditures will be moved and allocated effectively next year, and why the government tends to present different numerical interpretations – for example, sums requested in different contexts and their reflection as administrative expenses. Transparency and the need to obtain precise and consolidated data from the Ministry of Finance and the Ministry of Defence to verify the numbers were also at the heart of the debate.

Decisions Made 1
Collective Decision

No decisions were made at this session. The focus was on raising questions and clarifying facts, figures, and obtaining information from the ministries. In the absence of decisions, emphasis was placed on the need for the Ministry of Finance and the Ministry of Defence to verify prior information and confirm figures through written procedure.

Most Active Speaker
Urmas Reinsalu
Urmas Reinsalu

Isamaa fraktsioon

The most active speaker was Urmas Reinsalu (Isamaa). He represented the right-wing political direction and actively participated in both posing questions and critically discussing topics related to the budget and defense sector funding, as well as procedural matters of the session.

Esimees Lauri Hussar
14:36:29
AI Summary

The Speaker of the Riigikogu, Lauri Hussar, will announce the fourth question to Prime Minister Kristen Michal, to be asked by Riigikogu member Urmas Reinsalu on the substance of policy, and will invite Reinsalu to speak.

14:36:36
AI Summary

Urmas Reinsalu said that the government's 5% cuts in administrative expenditures cannot be considered real savings, because next year's budget is only 0.1% smaller, and he asked why the reduction of 96.852 million euros planned for the purchase of defense-specific equipment occurred, even though it was promised to add 75 million for ammunition.

Peaminister Kristen Michal
14:38:21
AI Summary

Prime Minister Kristen Michal said that the growth of defense and security expenditures (2.16% in 2022 and 3.4% this year) will create about 550 million euros in additional costs, which will be covered by a security tax, and from 2025 to 2031 there is a plan to purchase ammunition totaling around 1.6 billion euros, while the budget should be made clearer and more precise numbers can be obtained in writing from the Ministry of Finance and the Ministry of Defence.

Esimees Lauri Hussar
14:39:57
AI Summary

The chair thanks and asks Urmas Reinsalu to pose a clarifying question.

14:39:59
AI Summary

Urmas Reinsalu highlights a paradox: although a VAT increase and additional funding for national defense are promised, and the draft budget shows 75 million euros for buying ammunition, at the same time defense-specific equipment costs (including ammunition) are reduced by 96,852,000 euros, which raises the question of why defense equipment is being purchased less.

Esimees Lauri Hussar
14:42:26
AI Summary

The speech proclaims that your time has finally come to an end.

14:42:28
AI Summary

Urmas Reinsalu said that this is a very concrete and politically charged question.

Peaminister Kristen Michal
14:42:31
AI Summary

Prime Minister Michal thanks the questioner.

Esimees Lauri Hussar
14:42:32
AI Summary

The chairman Lauri Hussar thanked and asked the esteemed prime minister.

Peaminister Kristen Michal
14:42:35
AI Summary

Prime Minister Kristen Michal said that the claims and numbers presented in the word cloud are being checked through the Ministry of Defense and the Ministry of Finance, and he is discussing with the ministers to confirm which equipment purchases and in which years exactly they will be carried out.

Esimees Lauri Hussar
14:43:12
AI Summary

The chair thanks and asks Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvarti to present an additional question.

14:43:15
AI Summary

Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart claims that the deterioration of the socio-economic situation due to the Reform Party's economic policy has forced people to steal and has increased crime, and emphasizes that the country's welfare depends on people's ability to make ends meet.

Peaminister Kristen Michal
14:45:05
AI Summary

Although crime has increased, poverty has decreased and the overall situation has improved, especially due to the rise in the minimum wage, increases in pensions and other measures, and the crime problem must continue to be addressed at its root causes.

Esimees Lauri Hussar
14:46:17
AI Summary

The chairman, Lauri Hussar, thanks the participants, ends our consideration of today’s fourth question, and before the start of the fifth question Urmas Reinsalu raises his hand and asks about the procedure for conducting the meeting.

14:46:28
AI Summary

Urmas Reinsalu expressed confusion and criticism about government spending, stating, based on a review prepared with the help of experts, that costs have not decreased and that, had counterfeit money been reduced, they would have been about 100 million euros higher. He stressed that the public had been misled and asked the Speaker of the Riigikogu for advice on how to obtain concrete answers from the Prime Minister — whether to submit a new written question or repeat the question at the information session.

Esimees Lauri Hussar
14:48:01
AI Summary

Thank you! Dear colleague, you have many options for asking questions: a written question, a parliamentary inquiry, a follow-up question during the information session, or a Riigikogu member's question at the next information session, and also a clarifying question.