Interior Ministry Cuts

Session: 15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, information briefing

Date: 2024-05-29 16:13

Participating Politicians:

Total Speeches: 7

Membership: 15

Agenda Duration: 9m

AI Summaries: 7/7 Speeches (100.0%)

Analysis: Structured Analysis

Politicians Speaking Time

Politicians

Analysis

Summary

The first part discussed the salary situation of people working in the administrative area of the Ministry of the Interior, particularly police officers, rescuers, and border guards. The question was posed by Riigikogu member Vadim Belobrovtsev, and the central topic was whether salary supports and raises would remain in effect or be temporarily frozen, and how this aligns with the growing budget deficit and the drafting of the next supplementary budget. Since budget years and government priorities are continuously being reshaped, the question was raised whether the salary levels planned until 2027 are realistic, and what risks and limitations accompany potential tax changes and cuts.
Secondly, the focus was on tax and taxation system decisions, including the possibilities of eliminating or reducing the tax hump, and how potential additional resources and loan funds affect the salaries of state employees and public service. The discussion was strongly linked to the consideration of measures aimed at addressing the state budget shortfall and alleviating the budget deficit, highlighting different views on who must ultimately bear the greater burden when implementing tax and other changes.

Decisions Made 1
Collective Decision

No decisions were made; the discussion continues, and any potential decisions, including tax changes and the organization of payroll funds, will be determined subsequently within the framework of budget negotiations and the supplementary budget.

Most Active Speaker
Vadim Belobrovtsev
Vadim Belobrovtsev

Eesti Keskerakonna fraktsioon

The most active speaker was the Minister of the Interior, Lauri Läänemets (pid: uexmw3AlP24). He represents the Centre Party, and his position in the discussions strongly occupies the middle ground—categorized as “other” (middle leadership position). The intense and thorough discussion focused on the sustainability of salary levels, the permanence of public service, and the potential risks and impacts of tax and budget changes on public order and security.

Esimees Lauri Hussar
16:13:04
AI Summary

The Riigikogu proceeds to the sixth question addressed to Minister of the Interior Lauri Läänemets, where Riigikogu member Vadim Belobrovtsev inquires about the cuts at the Ministry of the Interior.

Vadim Belobrovtsev
Vadim Belobrovtsev
Profiling Eesti Keskerakonna fraktsioon
16:13:14
AI Summary

Vadim Belobrovtsev asks whether the salary freeze for police officers, rescuers, and border guards until 2027 is true, or if they should expect a slightly more optimistic message soon, considering the budget cuts and the supplementary budget.

Siseminister Lauri Läänemets
16:15:05
AI Summary

Minister Lauri Läänemets said that a salary increase is necessary for police officers, rescuers, emergency center staff, teachers, and medical workers, but despite the constraints of the state budget, a balance must be struck between cuts and tax changes, and there needs to be a discussion about who should pay to cover the billion-euro deficit.

Esimees Lauri Hussar
16:18:10
AI Summary

Chairman Lauri Hussar asked Vadim Belobrovtsev to submit a clarifying question.

Vadim Belobrovtsev
Vadim Belobrovtsev
Profiling Eesti Keskerakonna fraktsioon
16:18:13
AI Summary

Vadim Belobrovtsev called on the Centre Party faction to unite behind the idea that the wealthy should pay more, promised to reduce the budget deficit by half a billion, and proposed abandoning the Reform Party's harsh tax measure so that the solution agreed upon by the government would allow for raising the salaries of police officers, rescuers, border guards, and teachers by more than 1.7%.

Siseminister Lauri Läänemets
16:19:57
AI Summary

Interior Minister Lauri Läänemets stated that the budgetary cost of eliminating the tax hump is 500 million euros in the first year and 250 million in subsequent years. While this is one option that could ease the budget strain, the implementation of a progressive income tax must be considered, because Estonia's wealth inequality and socio-economic problems constitute a part of national security, and it is the state's duty to balance income distribution through taxation.

Esimees Lauri Hussar
16:23:03
AI Summary

Chairman Lauri Hussar expressed his thanks, noted that there were no further questions, and concluded the consideration of today's sixth item.