By Plenary Sessions: Aleksandr Tšaplõgin
Total Sessions: 89
Fully Profiled: 89
2025-10-16
XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
No direct political confrontation is being expressed; the criticism is aimed instead at the state's inaction regarding the compensation and regulation of high prices. The criticism is policy- and results-based, not personal.
2025-10-08
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The confrontation is aimed at both the government minister (on the issue of healthcare funding) and the rapporteur/government coalition. The criticism is intense, encompassing political discord and culminating in a direct personal accusation of lying for distorting legislative facts. No willingness to compromise is evident; instead, the dishonesty of the opposing side is emphasized.
2025-10-07
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The speaker is in an opposition position, criticizing the government's actions in the context of the budget. The criticism is policy- and results-based, focusing on whether the budget offers solutions for alleviating poverty.
2025-09-10
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, press briefing
The opposition's stance is directed at members of the government and their advisors. The criticism is both political (the issue of the Moscow Patriarchate) and personal and ethical, demanding an apology from the prime minister for insulting a colleague. The attacks are intense and focus on ethical accountability and procedural violations.
2025-09-04
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The opposition’s stance is strong, targeting the government and the prime minister over issues of tax policy, values, and parliamentary norms of conduct. The government is criticized for introducing new taxes and for allocating state funds to Russian-language media, whose objectivity and values are called into question. Criticism is also directed at the inaction of the presiding officer regarding the prime minister's rude behavior.
2025-06-18
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The primary conflict is aimed at the government ("this government"), which intends to phase out oil shale, and the businesses accused of enriching themselves with state backing. The criticism is intense, alleging that the opposition is manipulating the smart green energy scheme and engaging in outright deception.
2025-06-18
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing
The primary criticism is aimed at the government's energy minister and their policies, particularly regarding the subsidizing of wind energy and the construction of new wind turbines. Strong criticism is also leveled against the state-owned company Elering and the Nord Pool electricity exchange, accusing them of enriching speculators and engaging in unfair competition. The criticism is policy- and procedure-based, calling into question the freedom and fairness of the market.
2025-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The primary opponents are the government as a whole, specific ministers (Michal, Ligi, Taro), and the Social Democrats. The criticism is intense and policy-based, accusing them of driving the economy into the ground and violating the principles of the rule of law. Compromise is ruled out, as the speaker directly demands "a different government."
2025-06-09
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The main opponent is the current government and its policies, which are accused of mismanaging priorities and squandering state funds. The criticism is policy- and performance-based, labeling the government’s actions as the "insane burning of state money." The opposition is intense and uncompromising, culminating in a direct call for a new government.
2025-06-04
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing
The primary target of opposition is the government and the prime minister, who stand accused of election fraud, tax hikes, and allowing security to deteriorate to its worst state in the last 30 years. The criticism is intense, focusing equally on political legitimacy and specific policy failures. Compromise is off the table, as opponents are demanding the immediate resignation of the government.
2025-06-03
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fifth session, plenary session
The opposition is directed at the actions of the government or the responsible minister concerning the management and financing of the Rail Baltic project. The criticism is policy- and procedure-based, calling into question the project's feasibility, security, and the success of international cooperation.
2025-06-02
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session
The confrontation is directed against the government/minister, criticizing the content of a specific document and the political choices. The criticism is policy-based, emphasizing the lack of cuts to administrative costs. The intensity of the criticism is highlighted by a factual comparison with Europe.
2025-05-13
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The main confrontation is directed at the presenter, who is criticized both for opposing the referendum and for ignoring the burden of consumer subsidization. The criticism is intense and is expressed through direct accusations of disregarding the public and showing a lack of concern for them.
2025-05-07
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The primary adversary is the government, which faces criticism for cutting social spending and pursuing an ill-conceived green transition. The criticism is policy-driven, further accusing the government of creating avenues for corruption related to the allocation of 3 billion euros to unknown organizations. No willingness to compromise has been expressed; instead, they are demanding the rejection of the proposed bills.
2025-05-07
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing
The primary opposition is aimed squarely at the minister and the government, who are being criticized for the decline of agriculture and inadequate support. The criticism is policy-driven and results-oriented, accusing the state of failing to guarantee stable conditions for local producers. They are demanding an immediate and concrete strategic shift that rules out the continuation of the current policy.
2025-04-21
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The opposition is aimed at the current e-voting system and its defenders, who are criticized for procedural deficiencies and international controversy. The criticism is strong and is based on the system’s similarity to countries that Estonia considers undemocratic.
2025-04-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The primary adversary is the Reform Party, which faces criticism for the 2013 market reform that resulted in price hikes and opened the market up to speculators. The criticism is intense and policy-driven, accusing the government of favoring speculators and the Estonian state (through Elering) of cynically generating profits at the expense of consumers. No willingness to compromise has been expressed; instead, they demand a radical overhaul of the system.
2025-04-09
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing
The main opponents are the Minister of Finance and, more broadly, the government, who are criticized for the lack of control over state finances and their uncertain economic policy. The criticism is intense and is based on the ministers' own contradictory statements, such as claims that Estonian finances are managed by Putin or that Estonia lacks a market economy.
2025-03-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The main opponents are the governing coalition, especially the "pink social democratic party" and former Minister of the Interior Lauri Läänemets. The criticism is intense and ranges from political motivation (gaining voter support) to ideological accusations (acting like Bolsheviks/Lenin). No willingness to compromise is expressed; instead, opponents are accused of undermining state security for the sake of their political and financial interests.
2025-03-24
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session.
The confrontation is directed squarely at the government, which is being accused of endless lying and misleading the public regarding the issue of cheap electricity. The criticism is intense and political, stressing that the government is imposing the green agenda at the expense of consumers, thereby serving the business interests of green energy producers. The criticism also extends to Brussels, which is the source of the political decision to make the use of oil shale economically unprofitable.
2025-03-19
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing.
The confrontation is directed against the ruling coalition and a specific coalition partner (Eesti 200), who are accused of exploiting their political position to benefit affiliated companies. The criticism is intense, focusing on issues of unfair competition and corruption. The speaker questioned the ethics and integrity of the government's actions.
2025-03-17
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The primary targets of criticism are the government (specifically the prime minister) for the allocation of state funding, and certain Russian-language media outlets (Delfi, Postimees) due to their content and perceived partisan bias. The criticism is intense and centers on issues of values and the misuse of public funds, thereby challenging the fundamental principles of democracy and the independence of the press.
2025-03-12
The 15th Riigikogu, fifth sitting, information briefing.
The primary criticism is aimed at Prime Minister Kaja Kallas and her administration, particularly concerning undiplomatic statements made toward the Trump administration and accusations of spreading Kremlin narratives. The criticism is intense and focuses on political and diplomatic missteps.
2025-03-10
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The primary criticism is aimed at the government, which decided to continue subsidizing the loss-making national airline. The criticism is intense, focusing on political failure and suggesting possible unethical conduct or personal interests.
2025-02-19
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary sitting
The main opponent is the Estonian Social Democratic Party, which is being criticized for closing churches, with their actions being compared to Bolshevik looting. Criticism directed at the minister is intense and focuses on the lack of answers, and specific evidence regarding Kremlin influence is being demanded. The confrontation is ideological and political.
2025-02-18
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The main opponents are the governing coalition and financial institutions (the Bank of Estonia, the Financial Supervision Authority, the Ministry of Finance), who are accused of protecting bankers and robbing the people. The criticism is intense and political, focusing on the government's unfair tax policy and lack of solidarity, pitting "Swedish bankers" against "starving Estonians."
2025-01-29
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The opposition is aimed at state-imposed regulations that create unfair competition by supporting renewable energy while simultaneously imposing heavy taxes on oil shale energy. The criticism is policy-based, accusing the state of violating the principles of the market economy and forcing consumers to subsidize producers.
2025-01-22
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session.
Strong opposition is directed towards the government and ministers, whose claims regarding the inefficiency of tax cuts are deemed incompetent. The criticism is based on both policy and competence, ironically questioning whether Estonian ministers are more qualified than their counterparts in Greece, Finland, or Germany.
2025-01-15
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The criticism targets the current sick leave benefits system, which is deemed "wrong and harmful" because it forces people to go to work while ill. Specific political opponents or parties who support the system were not named.
2024-12-18
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, press briefing
The main confrontation is aimed at the Estonian government and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, who are being criticized for interfering in Georgia’s internal affairs and imposing sanctions. The criticism is both political and procedural, hinting at possible double standards in how protests and election results are handled.
2024-12-11
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The primary adversary is the government and its ministers, who face severe criticism for their incompetence and policies that harm the economy. The criticism is twofold: policy-based (tax hikes) and results-based (the ongoing recession). The resistance is intense, and no willingness to compromise has been expressed.
2024-12-11
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth session, press briefing.
The main opponents are the government and its members (Kaja Kallas, Jürgen Ligi), who are being criticized for the economic recession and energy policy. The criticism is intense and focuses on the failure of the government's performance and the shifting of responsibility (specifically, blaming Putin for the economic hardships).
2024-12-10
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The main opponent is clearly identified as the governing coalition, which is being criticized for its intention to reject the bill put forward by the opposition. The criticism is both procedural and policy-based, calling into question the justification for the rejection.
2024-12-04
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
The main opponent is the government, which is being sharply criticized for its poor handling of the economy and unfair tax policy decisions. The criticism targets both specific policies (raising taxes during an economic crisis) and government spending, with critics labeling projects like Rail Baltic and the green transition as pointless. The government's actions are being described as detrimental and unjust, indicating that a compromise on the current issue is being ruled out.
2024-12-03
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The main criticism is directed at the state and its officials, who, under the draft bill, would receive excessive authority to monitor private life. The criticism is ideological and political, emphasizing the danger that the state will begin destroying normal families.
2024-11-20
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The primary opposition is the government and the rapporteurs of the draft legislation (e.g., Mr. Seeder), whose policies are deemed unjust and punitive toward the less affluent. Criticism is leveled both at specific policies (saving funds at the expense of the poor) and at fundamental rule-of-law principles (collective punishment). The resistance is intense, manifesting in proposals to reject or discontinue the bills, and the opponents' competence is being questioned, with references made to the former head of Kapo and the Chancellor of Justice.
2024-11-20
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, press briefing.
The primary opposition is aimed at the government (specifically the minister and the prime minister), criticizing their political decisions concerning the taxation of pensions and the strategy for the green transition. The criticism is substantive and intense, challenging the government's grasp of state debt and the resulting economic implications. Information regarding a willingness to compromise is currently unavailable.
2024-11-06
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The main criticism is directed against the government, which is accused of wasting public funds (the pointless Rail Baltic project, green subsidies, excessive bureaucracy) and implementing an unfair tax policy. The criticism is intense and policy-driven, casting doubt on the government's claim that there is a shortage of budget funds.
2024-11-06
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, information briefing
The criticism is aimed at the person who compiles the order of the Q&A session, who is suspected of personal bias ("that the compiler doesn't like me"). Indirect criticism is also leveled at the former newspaper of the Chairman of the Riigikogu, which ignores the speaker because they fail to meet its standards. The criticism is primarily procedural and personal.
2024-11-05
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session
The main targets of criticism are the prime minister and the government, who are accused of neglecting to protect national interests and diligently executing the mandates coming from Brussels. The criticism is policy-driven and intense, contrasting Estonia’s actions with those of other European countries (Germany, Poland).
2024-10-16
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The main opponent is the government, which is being criticized for its policies (tax hikes, wasteful spending) and ideological inconsistency (violation of free market principles). The criticism is intense and uncompromising; the faction proposes rejecting the legislation during the first reading. The government is also accused of imposing obligations on local municipalities without providing the necessary resources.
2024-10-16
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, press briefing
The primary adversary is the government, and specifically the Minister of Finance, whose policies and public statements are facing sharp criticism. The criticism targets both political decisions (such as energy subsidies) and the Minister’s rhetoric, which is being actively used to discredit him (the "Kremlin applause" narrative, the anecdote about eating canned goods). The intensity of these attacks is high, effectively calling into question the legitimacy of the government’s communication strategy.
2024-10-15
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
The main opponent is the government, which is being sharply criticized for policy-driven unfair taxation and raising excise duties. The criticism is intense and points to a fundamental opposition to the government's economic philosophy, accusing them of taking from the poor.
2024-10-14
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
The primary adversary is "your government" and the minister, who is facing sharp criticism over political decisions regarding healthcare funding. The critique is intense and rooted in values, specifically accusing the government of targeting the wallets of the poor rather than the wealthy.
2024-10-09
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, information briefing
The speaker is clearly taking an opposition stance, criticizing the government for its economic policy and the handling of the state budget procedure. The criticism is aimed at political inaction (specifically, support for local food) and procedural lack of transparency (the comprehensibility of the budget).
2024-10-08
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The opposition is indirect and anticipatory, as the speaker assumes the bill will be rejected. Specific opponents or the substance of the criticism are not detailed; instead, the focus is on the procedural outcome.
2024-09-25
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
The opposition is aimed at the decision-makers or those who made the proposal, who are allowing a newly established company to audit the National Audit Office. The criticism is both procedural and policy-based, focusing on the lack of credibility of the selected auditor.
2024-09-25
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, press briefing
The opposition's stance is strong and directed squarely against the government and the prime minister. The criticism is policy-based, focusing on the negative consequences of the government's economic decisions (tax increases) and its inability to halt the decline in the standard of living. The attacks are intense, demanding concrete solutions and financial transparency.
2024-09-19
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The primary conflict is with the government’s position, which denies any link between financial resources and having children—a claim the speaker explicitly labels an outright lie. The criticism is policy-driven, focusing on the government’s inability to guarantee sufficient child benefits and the budget for school meals. Opponents are accused of lacking empathy, as they "most likely do not know what it means to raise children in poverty."
2024-09-18
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, press briefing
The standoff is directed at the government and the prime minister, criticizing their tax policy (the raising of VAT and corporate income tax). The criticism is policy-focused and intense, accusing the government of destroying the competitive advantage during the crisis.
2024-09-11
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, press briefing.
The primary opponents are the Reform Party (held accountable for national economic policy) and the Social Democratic Party (held accountable for local ethics and financing). Criticism is intense, accusing the government of an economic catastrophe, and SDE members of conflicts of interest regarding school funding. No readiness to compromise is being expressed.
2024-09-10
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary sitting
The criticism is directed at both the current electoral system and specific representatives who secured their mandates due to a high placement on the party list rather than through voters' actual votes. The backlash is intense, accusing them of lacking the public's trust and exploiting an unjust law, particularly if they have switched parties after obtaining the mandate.
2024-07-29
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The primary opposition is aimed at the Reform Party-led government, which stands accused of robbing the poor and causing the current economic downturn. The criticism is intense, policy-driven, and morally charged, demanding a complete overhaul of the tax policy. Specifically, Annely Akkermann, a member of the Reform Party, is mentioned.
2024-07-22
15th Riigikogu, Riigikogu's extraordinary session.
The main opponent is the Reform Party, which leads the government, and they are being criticized for the ongoing recession and the planned massive tax hikes. The criticism is intense, focusing on the failure of their policies and the negative impact these failures are having on the economy.
2024-07-15
15th Riigikogu, Extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The primary opposition is aimed squarely at those implementing the car tax, whose policy is being slammed as robbing ordinary people blind and damaging the economy. The criticism is intense and policy-driven, ruling out any compromise involving amendments to the tax ("no amount of changes will save it"). The government's preference (taxing cars) is also being contrasted sharply with the alternative proposed by the Centre Party (a special tax on banks).
2024-06-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, additional plenary session
The main opponent is "The Government," which is sharply criticized for financial incompetence and the errors that led to the supplementary budget. The criticism is policy- and performance-based, highlighting both cuts to social benefits and the closure of the rescue squad. The speaker categorically refuses to support the supplementary budget, arguing it was necessitated by the government's mistakes.
2024-06-12
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, information briefing
The confrontation targets the Prime Minister’s actions, criticizing the head of government for procedural irregularities and a lack of accountability regarding his participation in international meetings. The criticism is aimed at the government’s leadership style and its adherence to established norms.
2024-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
The speaker is opposing the ongoing debate in the Riigikogu concerning Georgia's internal affairs, specifically criticizing the principle of intervention. The criticism is directed at the political procedure and the policy of interference, not at a personal level.
2024-06-10
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The confrontation is directed at the government (the minister) and the commission responsible for drafting and processing the supplementary budget. The criticism is policy-based, focusing on the failure to account for economic growth and procedural deficiencies within the commission.
2024-06-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The main opponent is the government, which is being criticized for the poor state of the national budget and for tax increases that burden the poor. The criticism is political and focuses on the government's fiscal policy choices and the commission's decision to approve the car tax while simultaneously rejecting the Centre Party faction's proposal for a bank tax.
2024-06-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The confrontation is aimed at the prime minister and the government, criticizing the lack of transparency and the assumption of responsibility regarding international commitments. The criticism is procedural and focuses on whether the prime minister informed the government about what was discussed and the commitments undertaken at the Bilderberg meeting.
2024-05-29
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The opposition is directed at the coalition's policies, particularly the sugar tax, which is viewed as punitive. The criticism is political and centers on the coalition's failure to support more sensible alternatives proposed by the Centre Faction, such as a special tax on banks and progressive income tax.
2024-05-29
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, information briefing
The main opponent is the prime minister and the government, who are being criticized for fiscal irresponsibility and incompetence. The criticism is intense and uncompromising, leveling a direct accusation of misleading the public and outright lying.
2024-05-28
15th Riigikogu, third session, plenary session
The primary adversary is the government coalition and its representative ("your party"), who are directly accused of breaking promises and harming the elderly. The criticism is intense and includes both political charges (taxation) and ethical accusations ("you are robbing [us]").
2024-05-27
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary session
The main opponent is the government and the minister under discussion, who is being sharply criticized for breaking promises and implementing an unfair tax policy. The criticism is intense, accusing the government of robbing the poor and refusing to impose a special tax on bank profits.
2024-05-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, press briefing
The main opponent is the government and the prime minister, whose policies are criticized for inefficiency and for exacerbating crises. The criticism is aimed at the effectiveness of the policy and the government's inability to resolve the situation (for example, the teacher shortage), without directly questioning personal competence.
2024-05-09
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The main criticism is aimed at the government, which is accused of ignoring the flaws in e-voting and planning to expand its scope. The criticism is both procedural and policy-based, focusing on the government's inability to guarantee the integrity of the elections. No willingness to compromise has been expressed; instead, critics are demanding the complete abandonment of e-voting.
2024-05-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session.
The main confrontation is directed at the government and the Reform Party, who are being criticized for unfair taxation. The criticism is intense and extends beyond political choices, hinting at the government's dependence and fear of losing sponsors.
2024-05-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The main opponent is the ruling coalition and the prime minister, who are accused of illogical and security-threatening actions. Criticism is directed both at specific ministers (the Minister of the Interior, the Minister of Foreign Affairs) and at individuals supported by the government (the Mayor of Tallinn, who has business ties in Russia). The attacks are both policy-based and security-based, citing personal dependence and security risks.
2024-05-06
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
The confrontation is aimed at the government's education policy, particularly concerning teacher qualifications and employment. The criticism is policy-driven, demanding data and explanations from the minister regarding the consequences of the proposed changes (such as the elimination of the pedagogical education requirement and potential job losses).
2024-05-02
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The opposition is directed against the government's tax policy (the soda tax) and the presenters of the unclear political statement. The criticism targets both the political choices (punishment versus assistance) and procedural clarity, demanding that the purpose and truth of the statement be established. The attacks are policy- and procedure-based, not personal.
2024-04-30
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Third Session, Plenary Session.
The primary opponent is the government and the minister. The criticism is intense and policy-driven, focusing on tax hikes (VAT, excise duties, state fees) and the refusal to implement a special tax on banks. The government is accused of yet another attempt to take money from the most vulnerable segments of the population and of increasing the impoverishment of the people.
2024-04-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The opposition is directed at the rapporteur and, indirectly, at the commission, which has failed to provide a satisfactory answer to the fundamental questions concerning the security of e-elections. The criticism is procedural and substantive, focusing on the absence of verification mechanisms.
2024-04-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, information briefing
The main opponents are the government (the Reform Party and Isamaa), the Minister of Foreign Affairs, and the Mayor of Tallinn, Jevgeni Ossinovski. The criticism is intense, personal, and security-focused, centering on the ethical conflict and the support of Russia via tax payments. No willingness to compromise is evident.
2024-04-10
15th Estonian Parliament, third sitting, information briefing
The main opponent is the Prime Minister and the government, whose economic policy is deemed fundamentally wrong and dangerous. The criticism is policy-based, focusing on raising taxes and cutting expenditures, and comparing it to negative historical examples. The intensity of the attack is high, utilizing the term "suicide policy."
2024-04-03
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The primary opposition is aimed at the government and the prime minister, who are sharply criticized for their policy on taxing pensions and for breaking election promises. The criticism is intense, rooted in both policy and values, and involves direct accusations of injustice.
2024-04-02
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
The opposition is aimed at the speaker's positions, demanding an explanation as to why the motor vehicle tax is considered good, but the banks' excess profit tax is bad. The criticism is policy-based and focuses on the logic behind tax priorities and the lack of alternatives.
2024-03-20
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, press briefing.
The primary confrontation targets the government’s tax policy, which critics argue is slowing down economic growth and creating social injustice (due to the lack of exemptions). The criticism is intense and centers on specific political decisions, casting doubt on the government’s grasp of the resulting economic consequences.
2024-03-19
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The opposition is aimed at the government's political approach, which automatically links children's health to the introduction of new taxes (the sugar tax). The criticism is purely policy-based, questioning the viability of the proposed solution and offering better alternatives.
2024-03-13
15th Estonian Parliament, third sitting, information briefing
The main opponent is the Prime Minister and the government, who are being criticized for the prolonged duration of the economic recession and for their inaction. The criticism is severe and focuses on the government's inefficiency in restoring economic growth. The opposition's stance demands direct accountability and the presentation of concrete results.
2024-03-06
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, press briefing
The main opponents are Prime Minister Kaja Kallas and the Reform Party, who are accused of promising tax hikes and spreading misinformation. Isamaa is also criticized in connection with the privatization of Estonian Railways. The criticism is intense, focusing on both political decisions and personal accusations (lying, concealing the spouse's business dealings).
2024-03-04
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The main adversary is the Prime Minister and the government, whose tax policy is being criticized intensely and fundamentally. The criticism focuses on the unfairness of the policy, accusing the government of taxing the poor instead of the rich.
2024-02-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The primary opposition is aimed at the minister and the government, who face criticism for implementing a damaging car tax while simultaneously rejecting a solidarity tax on banks. The criticism is politically intense and substantive, raising doubts about the government's priorities and the interest groups they serve.
2024-02-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The main criticism is aimed at the minister and the ministries responsible for the budget and the payment of bonuses. The attack is intense and focuses on political injustice, accusing the government of rewarding poor performance and devaluing the actual workers.
2024-02-07
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The primary opponent is the government and the prime minister, who are accused of creating uncertainty for businesses and serving the interests of the 5% of oligarchs. The criticism is intense, focusing on the government's economic policy choices and ethical unfairness. The government's actions are directly labeled as the main risk to Estonian entrepreneurs.
2024-01-24
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The primary criticism is leveled against the government and ministries (especially PRIA), criticizing their fiscal decisions and poor performance in funding healthcare and education. The criticism is policy- and procedure-based, accusing the government of setting the wrong priorities. No willingness to compromise has been expressed; instead, they are demanding that funds be reallocated.
2024-01-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The main opponent is the government and the prime minister, who are being asked direct questions. The criticism is policy-based, focusing on the financial imprudence of the government's economic decisions (tax hikes) and the major project (Rail Baltic).
2024-01-10
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The primary targets of criticism are the Prime Minister and the Minister of Regional Affairs, whose claims regarding a good life and the stabilization of prices are deemed inaccurate. Criticism is also aimed at the inaction of the Competition Authority, suggesting a regulatory failure.
2024-01-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
The primary confrontation is between the government and a specific minister, who is being criticized for the policy regarding the funding of private media. The criticism is intense and ethical, focusing on the suspicion of an attempt to influence the media, which suggests a profound lack of confidence in the government's motives.