Session Profile: Aleksandr Tšaplõgin
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
2025-03-26
Political Position
The most striking positions are the strong opposition to revoking voting rights from non-citizens and the declaration of the Orthodox Church as a security threat. These positions are value-based, emphasizing that collective punishment violates the principles of democracy and the constitution. The government's policy is also criticized, being labeled "insane green policy" and serving purely political interests. The political stance is strongly oppositional.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates expertise in constitutional law (covering collective punishment and constitutional principles) and security risk analysis, demanding that risk assessments be conducted prior to the adoption of any decisions. Specific statistical data is utilized concerning the number of Russian citizens (80,000) and their voting patterns in the most recent elections. Furthermore, the legal status of the Orthodox Church and the absence of evidence regarding legal transgressions are also addressed.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The style is highly combative, accusatory, and urgent, expressing moral outrage ("I am ashamed of this government"). Strong historical parallels are employed (Bolsheviks, Lenin, the War of Independence) alongside a personal appeal (the blood of grandfathers). Emotional condemnation is added to the logical arguments (statistics, lack of evidence), labeling the opponents' actions as unlawful and divisive to society.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The data is limited to four appearances at a single plenary session (2025-03-26), where several pressing issues were discussed. Other activity patterns, such as meetings or travel, are absent.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The main opponents are the governing coalition, especially the "pink social democratic party" and former Minister of the Interior Lauri Läänemets. The criticism is intense and ranges from political motivation (gaining voter support) to ideological accusations (acting like Bolsheviks/Lenin). No willingness to compromise is expressed; instead, opponents are accused of undermining state security for the sake of their political and financial interests.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
There is no data available regarding cooperation, willingness to compromise, or a cross-party coalition. The speaker’s position is purely confrontational.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is on national issues (Estonian security, the constitution) and international topics (international risk, Russian citizens). Pühtitsa Convent is mentioned in relation to the Orthodox Church, but there is no specific emphasis on local government or the region.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Strong opposition is being voiced regarding government spending, criticizing the "insane green policy" and "questionable schemes." It is stressed that taxpayers (who pay their taxes diligently) should have the right to participate in how those taxes are allocated, thereby linking tax liability to the right to vote.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
The speaker strongly defends civil liberties and non-discrimination, opposing the collective punishment of 'grey passport' holders through disenfranchisement. A strong moral and historical framework is employed in defending the Orthodox Church against state interference, accusing opponents of anti-Christian activities.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The primary legislative focus is the opposition to a constitutional amendment aimed at stripping permanent residents of their right to vote. The speaker is a fierce opponent of this bill, calling it political activity that has nothing to do with normal legislative processes.
4 Speeches Analyzed