Agenda Profile: Aleksandr Tšaplõgin
Information session
2025-09-10
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, press briefing
Political Position
The political stance is heavily directed at the accountability of the government and the prime minister, stressing the importance of the internal culture of the parliament and respect for colleagues. A value-based issue is also being raised concerning the closure of institutions subordinate to the Moscow Patriarchate, which relates directly to the actions of a government advisor. The main focus remains on procedural correctness and the scrutiny of government actions.
5 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates expertise regarding the Riigikogu Rules of Procedure and Internal Rules Act and procedural matters, especially concerning the procedure for submitting questions during the Information Hour. This knowledge is utilized to challenge the decisions made by the presiding officer and demand that the Prime Minister adhere to the law.
5 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is formal and procedural, yet simultaneously demanding and challenging, particularly when addressing the government. Although the speaker employs a polite form of address ("Olge nii lahke!" / "Would you be so kind!"), they present sharp demands, such as requiring the prime minister to apologize for insulting a colleague.
5 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker participated actively in the Information Hour on two consecutive weeks (January 15 and 22), concentrating on overcoming procedural hurdles and ensuring immediate oversight of the government's actions. This pattern of activity encompasses both technical inquiries regarding microphone operation and substantive demands directed at the Prime Minister.
5 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The main standoff is directed against the prime minister and the government, criticizing their conduct (calling a colleague "stupid") and the political calls made by their advisors (the Moscow Patriarchate). The criticism is intense, focusing both on personal behavior and procedural correctness, and demands a public apology.
5 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The style of cooperation is indirect; the speaker refers to the presence of certain colleagues (Kristen Michal and Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart) to underscore the significance of the issue concerning the parliament's internal culture. Direct collaboration or the submission of joint draft legislation is not evident from the speeches.
5 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
Not enough data.
5 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Not enough data.
5 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
A sensitive socio-political issue was raised concerning the call by a government advisor for the closure of institutions subordinate to the Moscow Patriarchate. This matter has been presented as a controversial issue linked to government action, which requires clarification.
5 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is directed toward the enforcement of the Riigikogu Internal Rules and Procedure Act, particularly concerning the Prime Minister's conduct and the right of members of parliament to pose questions. The speaker is acting as an advocate for the implementation of the law, not as an initiator of new legal acts.
5 Speeches Analyzed