Session Profile: Madis Timpson
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
2025-05-05
Political Position
The speaker moderately supports the ongoing draft bill, while acknowledging that just punishment is a legitimate objective. He emphasizes the necessity of introducing amendments to the General Part of the Penal Code (KarS) within the bill, focusing on the technical precision of policy and legislation. He previously introduced a bill, while serving as a minister, that originated as a government compromise, the deficiencies of which he now admits in hindsight.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker possesses profound expertise in the field of criminal law and legislation, focusing specifically on the amendments to the General Part of the Penal Code (KarS). They demonstrate knowledge of the technical mechanisms involved in drafting legislation and the process of forging government compromises, while also raising a specific legal concern regarding the risk of the statute of limitations expiring.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is professional, analytical, and measured, incorporating both self-criticism regarding earlier work and constructive criticism concerning the current draft bill. The speaker employs formal address and focuses on logical and procedural arguments, such as highlighting the risk of the law lapsing.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker has been an active legislator, having previously presented bills on the floor as a minister. Their current pattern of activity involves asking questions during plenary sessions and raising concerns regarding both the speed of the legislative process and the technical details of the law.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
There is no direct opposition, as the speaker notes that they "don't directly have anything against this bill." However, they do present procedural and substantive criticism, emphasizing that the bill requires amendments to the General Part of the Penal Code (KarS) and warns of the risk of the proceedings dragging on and the law becoming obsolete.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The speaker refers to previous cooperation within the government, which resulted in a compromise solution, although he acknowledges its shortcomings. He is open to cooperation during the proceedings, expressing hope that the necessary amendments to the Penal Code (KarS) will be made.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
There is not enough data.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Not enough data.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
The focus is on the fundamental principles of the legal system, emphasizing the legitimacy of fair punishment. Broader social problems are not addressed; the focus remains strictly on the technical aspects of criminal law and ensuring the effective implementation of the law.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The primary legislative focus is on criminal law, particularly the necessity of amending the General Part of the Penal Code (KarS). The speaker is generally supportive, concentrating on refining the draft bill while stressing the critical importance of the speed of the legislative process to prevent the law from becoming time-barred or lapsing.
1 Speeches Analyzed