Session Profile: Madis Timpson
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
2024-11-20
Political Position
The political position centers on legislative clarity and efficiency, advocating for the consolidation of two similar constitutional amendment drafts into a single bill proposed by 61 members. The speaker supports the Reform Party faction's proposal to reject the competing draft bill during the first reading. Regarding social policy, emphasis is placed on the harmonization of systems and accounting for the financial impact of subsistence benefits (an additional cost of 1.7 million euros).
5 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates strong procedural and committee work expertise, accurately describing the processing of draft legislation, deadlines, and the involvement of organizations (e.g., the Estonian Social Work Association). The expert role is clearly within the field of social policy, addressing amendments to unemployment insurance, state levies, and subsistence benefits, while conveying the ministry's explanations in detail. When lacking knowledge (e.g., when trying to recall a specific detail), the speaker delegates the response to a colleague.
5 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The discourse is formal and procedural, focusing on detailed summaries of commission deliberations, questions posed, and ministry clarifications. The tone regarding political matters is conciliatory, avoiding reproach, but resolute in legislative decisions, relying on logical and fact-based reporting. Frequent references are made to consensus and procedural stages.
5 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker serves as the active rapporteur for the committee's work, presenting comprehensive reports to the plenary on the procedural progress of draft legislation and the consensus decisions reached, citing specific dates and meetings. This pattern of activity involves close communication with ministries and 24 different organizations during the discussion of the draft legislation.
5 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The stance toward opponents is generally conciliatory, avoiding personal criticism while acknowledging the Isamaa Party for raising the topic. However, on the legislative front, there is clear opposition to the Isamaa Party's constitutional amendment bill, and support is given to its rejection in the interest of procedural clarity.
5 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The speaker stresses the importance of cooperation and legislative unity, urging colleagues who signed the Isamaa bill to join the broader (61-member) draft legislation. Committee decisions on the further processing of these bills have consistently been made by consensus, pointing to widespread support. If required, he will delegate the response to a colleague (Erkki).
5 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
Not enough data
5 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
The economic perspectives address the regulation of state fees within social services, emphasizing that these fees should not be determined solely by the cost principle, thereby ensuring the availability of the service. The financial effect of the socio-political amendments has been calculated as an additional expenditure of 1.7 million euros allocated to subsistence benefits, demonstrating a willingness to increase social spending from the state budget.
5 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
The social policy focus centers on the unemployment insurance reform, which will eliminate two parallel systems and define the criteria for suitable employment (requiring qualification during the initial 20 weeks). The discussion also covers increasing the state fees for social services operating licenses and enhancing the role of the subsistence benefit, particularly for young people and students who lack prior work history.
5 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is split between harmonizing constitutional amendment bills and social policy reform, which includes amending the state fee structure and the unemployment insurance system. The speaker's role is that of the rapporteur for the leading committee, who ensures the smooth passage of the draft legislation in the plenary session by moving them consensually to the second and third readings.
5 Speeches Analyzed