By Agendas: Tanel Tein

The presenter is acting in cooperation, submitting the draft bill together with 15 members of the Riigikogu, which points to broad-based support for this legislative initiative. The cooperation is aimed at initiating and formally tabling the draft bill.

The collaborative approach is focused on gathering information and assessing procedural risks, often referencing issues previously raised within the committee. The speaker's goal is to ensure that the draft law is adequately prepared and inclusive before its final adoption.

The style of cooperation is inquisitive and solution-oriented, seeking the minister's answer and position regarding the structural reform. The speaker notes that this is a recurring question, which points to a broader concern, but there are no direct references to cross-party cooperation in the text.

The speaker initiates a dialogue with the Minister by raising a question about a new technological direction—the use of AI—which signals a readiness to cooperate in making the internal work of the Riigikogu more effective. They are seeking support and confirmation for their idea that this is a positive direction.

The speaker emphasized the strong cooperation, repeatedly citing the formation and leadership of the working group focused on involving private capital, which was done jointly with the Reform Party and the Social Democrats. He expressed satisfaction that the opposition was also included, and considers the collaboration between the state and the private sector to be key in shaping future mobility habits. This cooperation is directed toward achieving political decisions.

The speaker promotes cooperation with private medicine, seeing it as an opportunity to increase efficiency and reduce costs. Information is lacking regarding cooperation or readiness to compromise with political colleagues.

The speaker stresses the consensus within their party, Eesti 200, regarding the opposition to the bank tax. Solutions are being sought to enhance internal competition, signaling a willingness to cooperate on alternative policy approaches. The objective is to establish better conditions for all parties involved.

The speaker directly refers to Anti Poolamets's earlier thought or question, demonstrating a willingness to build upon topics initiated by colleagues and to cooperate with them. This indicates a supportive collaborative style within the framework of joint thematic development.

There is insufficient data.

A substantive discussion was held in the committee, which included Jarko Koort, advisor to the Sports Department of the Ministry of Culture, in order to receive clarifications regarding the changes in funding. The committee chair, Heljo Pikhof, proposed placing the draft bill on the plenary session agenda and proceeding with the final vote. The debate revealed a clear divergence between the positions of the Centre Party faction and the Ministry, although the procedural work remained cooperative.

Highly collaborative, emphasizing the importance of constructive discussion and expressing hope that the Riigikogu will support the idea of involving private funding. [The speaker] proposes discussing the topic in the committee and refers to the Minister of Culture's memorandum, which is soon to be submitted to the government, demonstrating a readiness for cooperation between the government and the committee.

The collaboration style is open and courteous, involving direct communication with colleagues (Jüri, Mario) using clarifying questions, which indicates a desire to acquire the necessary information for informed decision-making.

The speaker expresses pleasure and support for the Culture Minister's intention to involve private funding, and believes that the legislation heading to the government will bring about change. This signals a readiness to cooperate toward specific legislative objectives, particularly concerning the inclusion of the private sector.

Insufficient data.

The style of cooperation is institutional, as the speaker is presenting the collective decision of the Culture Committee and referencing the committee's joint proposal. This demonstrates a willingness to work by consensus within the framework of parliamentary structures.

The style of cooperation is polite and institutional, involving the posing of questions to the responsible minister within the framework of parliamentary debate. Communication with the minister is respectful and purposeful, focusing on enhancing political knowledge.

The style of cooperation is open and exploratory, seeking the opinion and potential support of the head of government (the Prime Minister) for broadening the policy. Reference is made to cooperation achieved through discussions held in the Culture Committee, which demonstrates a readiness to tackle the issues at the committee level.