By Agendas: Tanel Tein

Based on the data, a pattern of activity is evident when submitting a legislative initiative to the Riigikogu, specifically by introducing the draft act amending the Gambling Act and other legislation.

The pattern of activity involves participation in a parliamentary session during the second reading of a bill. The speaker refers to previous discussions held in the committee and the upcoming vote on Thursday, which indicates regular participation in the stages of the legislative process.

The operational pattern demonstrates involvement in formal sessions and debates concerning ministerial presentations, with a central focus on the execution of national strategies. The individual addresses recurring and widely discussed subjects, indicating a sustained focus on the structural issues within sports policy.

There is insufficient data.

The speech was delivered in the Riigikogu during a debate on a matter of national importance, which demonstrates a high level of political engagement. The speaker referenced their prior work, having spearheaded the establishment and operation of the Riigikogu working group on private capital involvement in the spring of 2023.

Due to the lack of data, activity patterns cannot be determined, with the exception of participation in the Riigikogu debate during the first reading of the Tallinn Hospital co-financing bill.

Insufficient data.

Insufficient data. (The speaker's pattern of activity during this period is limited to submitting a single query to the minister.)

There is insufficient data.

The pattern of activity is linked to the legislative process: participation in the Cultural Affairs Committee session (on May 7) and the presentation of the draft bill to the Riigikogu plenary assembly (on May 29). Tein assumes the role of rapporteur, presenting the substance of the committee's debate and answering clarifying questions. Heljo Pikhof directs the committee's work and submits proposals for the further deliberation of the draft bill.

They serve as the rapporteur for the Culture Committee and the representative of the leading committee during the Riigikogu plenary session. They actively participate in the committee's work, proposing that the topic of attracting private funding be added to the committee's agenda. They point out that the idea of attracting private funding has been circulating in the corridors for a full year, which demonstrates long-term engagement with the subject.

The action pattern is limited to asking one question during the first reading of the nuclear energy bill at the Riigikogu session.

The records are limited to a single substantive appearance during the Minister of Culture's presentation at a Riigikogu session, where the individual raised five key topics and questions. This demonstrates active engagement in policy formulation discussions, particularly concerning the funding of sports and culture.

Insufficient data.

The course of action demonstrates participation in the legislative process as the committee rapporteur, bringing before the Riigikogu the decision reached during the Culture Committee's session on January 25th. The speaker's role is procedural, involving the brief and concise introduction of the substance of the draft bill.

There is not enough data.

The speaker is an active Member of Parliament, having spoken at the session and addressed the Prime Minister. Reference was made to recent participation and discussion within the Culture Committee, which demonstrates activity in committee-level work.