Agenda Profile: Peeter Tali

Draft law amending the Churches and Religious Communities Act (570 UA) - Third Reading

2025-06-18

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

Political Position
Strong support for the draft amendment to the Churches and Congregations Act, which aims to terminate the activities of the Moscow Patriarchate in Estonia, as it is widely viewed as a tool for the Kremlin's hostile influence operations. This political position is deeply value-based, emphasizing national security and a firm opposition to Russian imperialist ambitions and Putin's criminal regime. The stance is aggressively anti-Kremlin, considering the Moscow church a direct remnant of the Russian occupation.

3 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
Demonstrates deep expertise in the history and canon law of the Orthodox Church, referencing the 1923 Tomos, the concept of the vicariate, and the continuous operation of the Pechory and Kuremäe monasteries. It utilizes specific security intelligence, naming the KGB agent aliases (Mikhailov, Drozdov) of Moscow Patriarchs Kirill and Alexy II, in order to support the assertion that the church is subordinate to the FSB. The topic is addressed from a geopolitical and security standpoint, linking it to the ideology of "Russkiy Mir."

3 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetoric is extremely combative, urgent, and sharply accusatory, especially directed at the Moscow church, which is referred to as a "hostile organization" and an "FSB subcontractor." It employs strong emotional comparisons, such as equating Kirill with radical mullahs calling for jihad, supporting this assertion with historical and security facts. The overall tone is formal, but the content is uncompromising and demands swift action.

3 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker is presenting in the Riigikogu chamber during the third reading of the bill, acting as an active participant in a high-priority legislative debate. He/She is speaking on behalf of the Eesti 200 parliamentary group and is focusing on bringing this specific legislative process to a close.

3 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The main opponent is the Moscow Patriarchate (MP) and its Estonian organization, which is criticized not for religious belief, but for political subordination and hostile influence activities. The criticism is intense and security-based, accusing the MP of operating as part of the Kremlin regime's vertical of power and dividing the Estonian population. Opponents (Bishop Daniel) are accused of attacking the Estonian state abroad with "brutal lies."

3 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
Speaking on behalf of the Eesti 200 faction, demonstrating intra-factional cooperation and support. It supports the "Christian hand of friendship" and the vicariate solution offered by Metropolitan Stefanus of the Estonian Apostolic Orthodox Church (EAOC) to the congregations of the Moscow church. This demonstrates a willingness to support intra-church reconciliation, provided that the relationship of subordination to Moscow is severed.

3 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is on Estonian national security and the situation of Orthodox congregations in Estonia, highlighting the continuity of the Petseri and Kuremäe monasteries. The topic is strongly connected to international geopolitics, particularly the context of Russia's imperialist ambitions and the "holy war" against the collective West.

3 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Insufficient data

3 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
The central social theme revolves around balancing religious freedom and national security. It emphasizes that while religious freedom is constitutionally protected, subordination to a patriarch who answers to the FSB does not constitute religious freedom. This stance prioritizes protecting the state from hostile influence operations that exploit faith.

3 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The main priority is the adoption of the draft law (570 UA) amending the Law on Churches and Congregations during the third reading. [The speaker] acts as a strong supporter of the bill, hoping that it will provide Orthodox believers with a clear legislative framework and that the president will sign it.

3 Speeches Analyzed