By Plenary Sessions: Rain Epler
Total Sessions: 131
Fully Profiled: 131
2025-10-15
The 15th Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
The political position is strongly oppositional, characterizing the government's draft legislation as poor and incompetent. The main stances focus on protecting domestic energy production and security, and opposing market consolidation, particularly when it comes at the expense of small businesses. It supports the direct election of the president and criticizes the government's climate goal-based policy, which effectively locks up mineral resources for 50 years.
2025-10-15
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Information Hour
The speaker’s positions are strongly opposed to the government’s policy in three areas: the prioritized development of renewable energy, which increases systemic risk and cost, and the EU climate targets (LULUCF). He/She also demands an exemption for Estonia from the quota-based distribution of refugees under the EU Migration Pact, citing the large number of Ukrainian war refugees. These positions are primarily policy- and results-driven, emphasizing economic damage and systemic risk.
2025-10-13
15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The political platform is firmly against tax hikes (including car, property, and progressive income tax), stressing the importance of economic liberty and valuing diligence. Furthermore, there is robust opposition to the increasing control exerted by European Union technocrats over national budgets, which is seen as a threat to democracy and the role of the Riigikogu (Estonian Parliament). The speaker also casts doubt on the government's sincerity regarding the proposed tax relief bill, dismissing it as a potential pre-election stunt.
2025-10-08
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The speaker positions himself as a staunch opponent of the government’s fiscal policy and the green transition, accusing the coalition of dishonesty regarding the stabilization of state finances. He emphasizes the urgent necessity of reducing the budget deficit and national debt while simultaneously prioritizing national defense, although he criticizes the use of defense expenditures as a pretext for excessive borrowing. The political framework is heavily value-based, stressing the preservation of Estonian culture and opposing spending directed toward "green values."
2025-10-07
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The speaker positions himself as a critical interrogator of the Minister of Finance's ideological approach and decisions. He demands transparency in the government's budget process, specifically asking about the "crazy ideas" that were prevented and those that ultimately remained in the budget. Furthermore, he calls into question the minister's right to criticize the Institute of Economic Research and merchants, suggesting this stems from a desire to avoid "unpleasant phenomena."
2025-09-22
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
The political position is strongly conservative and anti-government. The main themes are opposition to the liberal, globalist "woke agenda" and the "green frenzy" (or radical green shift), both of which are viewed as destructive to Estonia's well-being. There are calls to return to normalcy and conservative values, with the current administration being labeled the worst government in Estonia's history. Criticism of the government is strongly value-based and performance-driven.
2025-09-17
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting.
The political stance is strongly value-driven, focusing on safeguarding democracy and individual liberties against excessive state intervention. The speaker sharply opposes the "Orwellian" tendency where the officialdom and technocrats attempt to seize control of governance, viewing this as symptomatic of a wider crisis of democracy. He criticizes the government's performance as incompetent for allowing such threats to emerge, and demands the removal of the coalition from power.
2025-09-10
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
The political focus is centered on the accountability and communication style of a government minister (likely holding the social affairs portfolio) concerning COVID-19 vaccination recommendations. The criticism is severe, highlighting the minister's aggressive style—specifically how they "slammed" scientific debate. Concern is also being raised regarding the relationship between Estonia and its most crucial ally, stemming from the minister's recent remarks.
2025-09-10
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, press briefing
The political stance heavily centers on the lack of transparency and mismanagement concerning the utilization of funds by the Ministry of Defence and defence investments. The speaker is demanding the resignation of Defence Minister Hanno Pevkur, accusing him of lying and incompetence, which indicates strong opposition based on performance outcomes. The historical context of the border fence construction and the transparency of its associated costs are also deemed significant.
2025-09-09
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session.
The political stance is fiercely oppositional, focusing on the shortcomings of the government’s (specifically the minister’s) activities within the defense sector. Emphasis is placed on the absence of financial discipline and internal control systems, citing the National Audit Office report. This position is clearly performance-based, demanding the minister’s personal accountability and an assessment of their leadership capacity.
2025-09-08
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
The political position is strongly oppositional toward the government, accusing it of implementing liberal-democratic totalitarianism and abusing procedural rules. The primary political goal is to achieve Estonia's energy independence and restore the country's status as an electricity exporter, as it was in 2018. The speaker sharply criticizes Europe's and Estonia's excessive reliance on imports and their unreasonable energy choices (wind/solar). The political framework is strongly value-based and assertive.
2025-09-04
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The most striking themes are the opposition to the government’s green transition—which is viewed as destructive to the economy and general welfare—and the demand for transparency and accountability in state governance. The political stance is strongly aimed against the government’s policies, particularly concerning the activities of the Ministry of Climate and major projects (such as Rail Baltic). The overall framework is a blend of value-based criticism (property rights, child protection) and performance-based criticism (road funding, the energy crisis).
2025-06-19
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The politician holds strongly oppositional views, primarily focusing on resistance to the growth of bureaucracy (specifically citing the Nature Conservation Act) and opposing state surveillance and data collection (referencing the super database bill). He accuses the government (the Reform Party) of dishonesty, claiming they only correct their errors after the issues have already been brought to light by others. The political framework is heavily performance-driven, characterized by criticism of the government's activities and incompetence.
2025-06-18
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The most prominent issue is the car tax, regarding which indirect opposition is being voiced, emphasizing the inconsistencies and hypocrisy of its proponents. The focus lies on political strategy and procedural correctness (consultations), thereby casting doubt on the opponents' true motives. The political framework is primarily outcome-based and centers on analyzing the behavior of parliamentary members.
2025-06-17
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The political stance is strongly opposed to the draft legislation concerning the creation of a super database for the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) and the legalization of profiling. This position is principled, focusing on protecting citizens' privacy and freedoms from excessive state control ("the deep state"). Furthermore, the economic policy of the ruling coalition (the Reform Party, the Social Democrats, and Eesti 200) is sharply criticized, with accusations that they are impoverishing the populace.
2025-06-16
XV Riigikogu, V Session, Plenary Sitting
The political position is strongly anti-regulatory, demanding the elimination of ESG reporting and the 100% renewable energy target in order to focus on boosting the economy and defense capabilities. Criticism is aimed at the government's inefficiency and rising costs, particularly in waste management and IT development. The speaker presents himself as a prophet whose earlier warnings (regarding the renewable energy target) the government has only belatedly acknowledged.
2025-06-04
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
There is strong opposition to the Reform Party’s green energy policy, with wind farms being deemed expensive, unreasonable regarding land use, and restrictive of local communities' rights. The group demands a radical overhaul of party financing supervision, viewing the ERJK’s activities as absurd bureaucracy that stifles civic activism. The political framework itself is a mix of policy-driven (costs, efficiency) and value-based (protection of rural life) approaches.
2025-06-04
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing
The political stance centers on government accountability and the deadlines associated with major infrastructure projects, specifically Rail Baltic. The speaker is demanding a clear and direct response from the Prime Minister regarding the project's 2030 completion date, thereby casting doubt on the government's overall capability. The emphasis is strongly placed on the performance of the government's activities and the delivery of its promises.
2025-05-21
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
A strong focus on issues related to the energy sector and reducing bureaucracy. The speaker is firmly opposed to both mandatory sustainability reporting and the 100% renewable energy target for 2030, calling the latter a "foolish goal." The political framework is heavily performance-based, emphasizing the correctness of their previous positions and criticizing the Reform Party's false promises. The speaker considers the primary objective of the state to be the preservation of a free Estonian state, Estonian culture, and language.
2025-05-19
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
The political stance is heavily focused on the shortcomings in regional policy and security in Southeast Estonia, highlighting emigration, low income, and inadequate infrastructure. The speaker is strongly critical of the government's inaction and the quality of political leadership, demanding the prime minister's resignation. The criticism is aimed at the government's priorities, which favor modern solutions over maintaining a human presence in border regions.
2025-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The speaker is in strong opposition to the government’s current energy and climate policy, deeming it unreasonable and ideologically driven, which he believes will lead to a decline in Estonia’s economic competitiveness. He strongly advocates for developing dispatchable capacity (oil shale) in the short term and nuclear energy in the long term, prioritizing affordable energy and national interests. He sharply criticizes the 100% renewable energy mandate and the carbon quota system.
2025-05-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.
The political stance is strongly oppositional, focusing on the government's weak political leadership and ideological direction. The speaker sharply criticizes tax hikes, which harm low-income and rural residents, as well as the wide discretion given to officials in social and security matters. The statement is highly performative and critical, culminating in a call for the minister to resign if he fails to improve his performance.
2025-05-07
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Strong opposition to the coalition's (especially the Ministry of Climate's) green transition policy, labeling the accelerated development of renewable energy as "madness" and "irresponsible." The opposition favors dispatchable energy generation capacity, such as oil shale and nuclear power, over intermittent sources. Criticism is directed both at political values ("the liberal elite") and the government's poor performance (sloppy management, budget deficits).
2025-04-24
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker places strong emphasis on energy policy, forcefully challenging the government’s target of reaching a 100% share of renewable energy in annual volume by 2030, which he considers both inefficient and expensive. He strongly advocates for retaining controllable capacity (oil shale) during the transition phase and constructing a nuclear power plant as a long-term fix, highlighting the crucial role of affordable energy in boosting the economy. His position is deeply rooted in policy and facts, and he accuses the government of engaging in "number magic" and disregarding factual evidence.
2025-04-23
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The political focus is heavily centered on energy stability and security, prioritizing base load capacity (oil shale, nuclear) over intermittent electricity sources (wind, solar). This approach necessitates a balancing mechanism. There is strong opposition to short-sighted political decisions (such as those driven by local government elections) and the unfair misuse of the term "justice" in energy policy. The topic of security (specifically, disconnecting from the Russian grid) is viewed as a near-universal, cross-party consensus.
2025-04-23
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing
The political stance is strongly anti-government, focusing on the administration's instability and the lack of public trust. The speaker criticizes the Reform Party for retaining socialist principles despite having expelled the Social Democrats (Sotsid) from the cabinet. The primary demand, based on the government's poor performance, is the calling of snap elections to form a new, functional administration. Also under scrutiny are the Reform Party's alleged parallel negotiations with Eesti 200 and Isamaa.
2025-04-17
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The primary focus is placed on improving the well-being of Estonian families and stimulating domestic consumption, for which a bill has been submitted proposing to lower the VAT on foodstuffs to 5%. The political attitude is strongly oppositional, criticizing the government's actions that have resulted in economic recession and high inflation. The period of the previous government (EKRE and the Center Party) is recalled positively as a time that brought a breath of fresh air, contrasting sharply with the current negative situation.
2025-04-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The most prominent issue is national sovereignty in the energy sector, coupled with strong criticism of the Prime Minister for passively following Brussels' lead (for instance, when assessing the necessity of offshore wind farms). The demand is that the Prime Minister must lead the government based on Estonian national interests, rather than simply awaiting European Union directives. This position is highly critical and centers on the shortcomings in the government's capacity to govern.
2025-04-09
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The political position is strongly oppositional, focusing on the abolition of unfair taxes (the car tax) and stricter regulation of the financial sector. Emphasis is placed on the necessity of protecting the populace from "predatory capitalism" and ensuring social justice in taxation, especially concerning families and residents of rural areas. These positions are strongly value-based, stressing the state's commitment to caring for its own people versus "big foreign uncles."
2025-04-09
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing
The political stance is strongly oppositional, focusing on sharp criticism of the governing coalition's "steamroller politics" and the actions of the Speaker of the Riigikogu. The speaker emphasizes a pragmatic approach to international politics, supporting the view that good relations must be maintained with the USA regardless of the administration in power there. These positions are strongly value-based, centering on the themes of honesty and duplicity.
2025-04-08
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
It focuses on criticizing the substance of the government’s actions and legislation, particularly concerning the activities of the Social Democrats. There is strong opposition to new taxes (the car tax) and the inefficiency of state spending, notably highlighting the billion that remains unused. The political framework is heavily value-driven and fundamentally questions the competence of the government.
2025-03-24
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session.
The political focus is heavily concentrated on the energy sector, opposing the promotion of renewable energy, which is characterized as inefficient and requiring costly system services. They support weather-independent generation (oil shale, nuclear energy) and demand exemption from the CO2 quota fee. Criticism is aimed at ideological policymaking and unethical conduct, accusing the opposing parties of introducing elements of a planned economy. The political framework is strongly results-oriented, emphasizing actual costs and facts.
2025-03-19
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing.
The political stance is strongly oppositional, centering on the Prime Minister's inconsistency and lack of a grand vision (calling him a "flip-flopper"). The most crucial issues are energy (specifically, the cancellation of offshore wind projects), the proposed security tax, and advocating for tax cuts. The criticism targets the government's failure to deliver on its promises (such as budget cuts) and the resulting political uncertainty.
2025-03-18
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fifth sitting, plenary session
The political stance is strongly reformist and critical of the government, demanding snap elections because, in the speaker's view, the ruling party no longer represents the people's perspectives. The speaker also supports a radical reduction of bureaucracy in party financing, emphasizing transparency achieved through bank transfers. The political framework is primarily focused on criticizing the government's actions and legitimacy.
2025-03-17
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The political stance is strongly oppositional, demanding the prime minister's resignation and snap elections. The primary political issue is the opposition to the car tax, which they deem unfair and cynically targeted at families with children and residents of rural areas. The criticism focuses on the government's poor performance and low approval ratings, making it heavily results-oriented.
2025-02-27
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The political stance is fiercely oppositional, centered on the government’s (especially the Reform Party’s) lack of democratic principles and general untrustworthiness. Key issues include energy policy—which they argue should rely on national resources rather than diversification—and the government’s constant obfuscation and outright lies (regarding tax hikes and energy consumption forecasts). The overall political framework is heavily geared toward criticizing the government’s activities and ethical conduct.
2025-02-25
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The political position is firmly aimed at restricting voting rights in local elections exclusively to Estonian citizens. The speaker questions the coalition’s motives regarding the constitutional amendment, ironically asking whether Estonia plans to leave the European Union, given that the accession treaty already guarantees the right to vote. The stance is value-based, emphasizing national sovereignty and criticizing the government's actions.
2025-02-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The political position is strongly critical of the government and the prime minister, focusing on the government's poor performance regarding the deteriorating economy and budget. Key issues include energy decisions tainted by corruption, the failure to restrict business activities with Russia, and the blatant accusation of the biggest ally by a coalition partner. The criticism is intense and results-oriented, accusing the government of making foolish decisions.
2025-02-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The political focus is heavily centered on foreign policy and allied relations, particularly with the United States, which is considered Estonia’s most important ally. The speaker sharply criticizes the government’s actions, which, in their view, are damaging these relationships (citing examples like the UN vote and the Interior Minister's remarks). They stress the necessity of maintaining good relations with the US and question the fitness of certain government members for office due to their behavior, which undermines allied ties. The positions articulated are strongly value-based and focus on evaluating the government's performance.
2025-01-29
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th sitting, information briefing
The political focus is heavily centered on foreign and security policy, highlighting concerns regarding Estonia’s relationship with the United States under the new administration. The speaker casts doubt on the effectiveness of the government’s diplomatic efforts, citing the failed communication by ministers (Tsahkna, Ligi) and Kaja Kallas. Maintaining relations with our biggest ally is deemed particularly crucial in the current volatile climate, underscoring the necessity for strong communication.
2025-01-28
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The political focus is on balancing the regulation of immigration and labor, seeking relief for highly specialized workers, while simultaneously worrying about the abuse of the system. Another important topic is financial regulation, where the link between flexibility and increased risks in international institutions is emphasized. The speaker's approach is policy-based, focusing on risk mitigation and the details of implementation.
2025-01-27
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Political activity is heavily focused on scrutinizing the Riigikogu's rules of procedure and the decisions made by the presiding officer, demanding a unified and traditional order of proceedings. On substantive matters, the speaker expresses strong skepticism regarding the concept of scientific consensus, viewing it as a dangerous tool for silencing dissent. These positions are strongly value-based, emphasizing procedural consistency and intellectual freedom.
2025-01-22
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session.
The speaker is fiercely opposed to the government coalition's policies, particularly regarding tax hikes (dubbed the "tax rally") and the costs associated with the green transition, which he believes are driving the country into poverty. The political framing is heavily focused on economics and the cost of living, stressing the necessity of giving the economy "oxygen" and improving people's standard of living. The speaker criticizes the government's optimistic fiscal forecasts and directly connects the current economic hardships to issues of national security and emigration.
2025-01-22
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing
The speaker urgently demands immediate and tangible steps to improve the well-being of the Estonian people, focusing specifically on lowering the VAT on foodstuffs. He/She criticizes the government's policy as results-evading bureaucracy that utilizes "analysis" and "working groups" to stifle initiatives. The stance is strongly results-oriented, demanding concrete action instead of political gamesmanship.
2025-01-21
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The political position is strongly opposed to the new draft law introducing social conditionality, viewing it as excessive bureaucracy and "green madness." This stance is policy-driven, emphasizing the absurdity of the new requirements—such as mandatory instruction on ladder usage—and the threat they pose to agricultural producers in the form of reduced subsidies. The speaker criticizes Estonia’s overzealousness in implementing European regulations, which, in their estimation, increases bureaucracy rather than reducing it.
2025-01-20
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The political platform involves strong opposition to the government’s economic and social policies, especially tax increases and cuts to family benefits. The paramount priority is seen as the need to return to "normality," opposing the ideas of "radical liberals" and the "woke world." The policy is framed both in terms of values and results, citing deteriorating statistics. The speaker promises to reverse the detrimental actions taken by the government at the earliest opportunity.
2025-01-15
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing
The political focus is on issues of energy security (prioritizing dispatchable capacity) and transparency in state governance (the public release of the Nordica report). He/She also sharply criticizes the coalition partner, the Social Democrats, viewing them as an obstacle to the development of the Estonian state. His/Her views are highly critical of the government's actions and emphasize accountability, targeting both political efficacy and core values (democracy, transparency).
2025-01-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The political focus is on increasing transparency and establishing control over the expense accounts of state officials, particularly the Chancellor of Justice and the Prosecutor General. The speaker strongly advocates for uniform transparency standards, criticizing the current situation where ministers and high-ranking officials are exempt from the requirement to submit detailed receipts, unlike members of the Riigikogu (Parliament). This position is strongly value-based, emphasizing the necessity of public oversight.
2025-01-13
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The political position is strongly anti-government, focusing on energy policy and criticism of the green transition. The speaker supports the use of oil shale as a vital reserve capacity and opposes the construction of gas power plants, calling it "the deed of the Kilplased" (an act of utter foolishness). He/She also strongly criticizes the centralization of the state, particularly the closure of courthouses, and the high tax burden imposed administratively.
2024-12-16
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The speaker adopts a fiercely oppositional stance on the car tax proposed by the government, labeling it a hastily assembled "botch job" and a blatant attempt to fleece the public. The political focus centers on criticizing the government’s incompetence and rush, as well as raising questions about the credibility of institutions and the conduct of ministers. Furthermore, the contradiction between the government's rhetoric of desiring cooperation and its actual behavior is highlighted.
2024-12-04
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
A strong opposition stance, focusing on sharp criticism of the government's budget and tax policies. It demands an end to the tax hike spree and a transition of the state budget to a cost-based system, calling the current activity-based budget "idiotic busywork." The framework is primarily results-based, stressing that the government's measures (excise duty increases) will not improve the budgetary position but will deepen the recession.
2024-12-03
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The political focus is on international financial accountability and ensuring the utilization of earmarked capital (EBRD funds) specifically for assisting Ukraine. The speaker expresses moderate skepticism as to whether the use of the money is sufficiently guaranteed to prevent its diversion to the bank's other objectives (e.g., the green transition). The focus is clearly policy- and accountability-centric, demanding concrete guarantees.
2024-11-21
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session
The political stance is deeply skeptical of the climate crisis narrative, stressing that it is driven more by economic interests and propaganda than by science. He/She sharply opposes the actions of the ruling coalition and the "champagne socialists," which, in his/her view, increase poverty while the political elite lives in luxury. The framing of climate policy is strongly value-driven and results-oriented, focusing on protecting profit and economic growth.
2024-11-20
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The political focus is on restricting the right to vote in local government elections solely to Estonian citizens. The speaker expresses strong support for this position and criticizes the government's/presenter's failure to submit a corresponding bill. The position is value-based, emphasizing the importance of citizenship as the basis for suffrage.
2024-11-20
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, press briefing.
This political stance is sharply critical and performance-driven, focusing specifically on the government's failure to manage major projects (such as Rail Baltic) and its reliance on unrealistic budget forecasts. The speaker expresses profound concern over the nation's finances and the establishment of strategic priorities, demanding that the government provide realistic risk scenarios and demonstrate financial accountability. This position is strongly antagonistic towards the current government's policies, particularly regarding cost allocation.
2024-11-13
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session.
A strong oppositional stance against the government's fiscal policy and lack of transparency, asserting that life in Estonia has gone "downhill" since 2021 (electricity +188%, food +49%). The key issues raised are the lack of control over the state budget and the inefficiency of government operations, accusing the government of living in a "parallel world" and indulging in fantasies. The political framework is heavily results-driven and critical, demanding that the nation's finances be put in order.
2024-11-13
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, information briefing
The political position is strongly value-driven and policy-critical, emphasizing the need to correct Estonia’s course following the US elections. The speaker forcefully opposes the prioritized development of renewable energy, climate hysteria, and the "woke agenda." Support is given to fossil fuels, nuclear energy, and the elimination of restrictions on free speech, viewing these developments as positive trends.
2024-11-11
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The most prominent topics are the restoration of the cap on land tax increases and the termination of state funding for elective abortions. The speaker is fiercely opposed to the government's tax policy, accusing the coalition of deceit and claiming Estonia is being governed by "Reds" who are harming citizens who are already struggling. The political framework is strongly value-based (honesty, protection of citizens) and focused on criticizing the government's actions.
2024-11-06
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The political focus is clearly on the car tax issue, where the speaker demands clarification regarding the original justifications for implementing the tax and its projected positive impact on Estonia's future development. He criticizes the actions of the government or the relevant committee concerning the handling of opposition bills and the absence of high-quality discussion. The position taken is heavily based on policy and procedural matters, calling into question both the necessity of the tax and the seriousness of the Isamaa party regarding its eventual abolition.
2024-11-06
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, information briefing
The political position is strongly opposed to the government’s current green transition policy, which is viewed as detrimental to European competitiveness. Emphasis is placed on the need to revise the policy in light of international events (the US presidential elections). The speaker demands a shift in direction, prioritizing stable and weather-independent energy sources instead of unstable wind and solar parks.
2024-11-05
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session
The political focus is on energy supply security and the competitiveness of electricity prices. The speaker criticizes the government's excessive optimism and calls for a serious long-term plan that would guarantee both supply and a competitive price. This stance is strongly oppositional and is aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of the government's activities.
2024-11-04
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The political stance is fiercely oppositional, centered on the inefficiency of the government’s activities since 2021. The speaker explicitly attributes the economic downturn, the widening budget deficit, and the increase in drug-related deaths directly to the Reform Party’s dominant role in the ruling coalition. The critique is primarily directed at the government’s poor track record and the tangible consequences of its policies, highlighting the persistent disconnect between reality and rhetoric.
2024-10-23
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
The political position is strongly value-driven and confrontational, centered on revoking the voting rights of citizens of the aggressor state and opposing the so-called woke agenda. The speaker accuses the government of being pro-Russian and promoting a Putinist narrative concerning historical monuments and symbols. There is also sharp criticism directed at the unethical and impolite behavior of ministers within the Riigikogu chamber, indicating a focus both on core values and on criticizing the government’s conduct and moral standing.
2024-10-23
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, information briefing
The political platform centers on strong opposition to renewable energy subsidies, which are viewed as detrimental to Estonia's competitiveness. A second key issue is the evaluation of the suitability of government ministers (Ligi, Läänemets), demanding that the Prime Minister take a clear position regarding uncivil behavior and red symbols. The policy framing is heavily focused on criticizing the government's activities and addressing value-based concerns (respect, security).
2024-10-22
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The political platform centers on strong support for introducing an extraordinary bank levy, viewing it as a crucial mechanism for balancing the budget and steering banking behavior. The speaker is critical of the government's performance, especially concerning the influence of major business interests (i.e., banks) on political decision-making. Furthermore, the platform expresses opposition to excessive regulation (such as mandatory ESG reporting), which undermines the competitiveness of both Estonia and Europe.
2024-10-21
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The political stance is strongly oppositional, focusing primarily on criticizing justice and economic policy. The speaker opposes the plan to rent out Estonian prison capacity to foreign states (such as the United Kingdom) and demands clarity regarding the grounds for incarceration, especially when it relates to political criticism. There is also strong opposition to the government's tax hikes (dubbed the "tax rally"), and skepticism is voiced concerning optimistic forecasts for economic growth. The overall political framework is a mixture of substantive policy criticism and the condemnation of the ethical conduct of government members.
2024-10-16
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The political position is one of strong opposition to the government's fiscal policy and tax hikes. The speaker demands budget transparency and accountability, criticizing the broad discretion ministers have in reallocating funds, as well as tax increases that undermine competitiveness and the ability of low-income individuals to make ends meet. The focus is heavily directed toward criticizing the government's actions and incompetence.
2024-10-15
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
The speaker is in strong opposition to the government’s policies, focusing his criticism on the economic recession, hyperinflation, and flawed energy policy decisions. He opposes tax hikes (excise duties, the tax hump) and criticizes the government’s actions on a values basis, accusing it of pursuing anti-family and anti-child policies and viewing human existence as a burden on nature. The political position is strongly results-oriented and ideologically charged, emphasizing the effectiveness of the opposition’s activities (the postponement of the tax hump, the withdrawal of the child protection law bill).
2024-10-14
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
Strong opposition to the government's policies, particularly the cuts to social benefits and tax hikes that undermine the sense of security for families with children. The primary issues are the demographic crisis and supporting the birth rate, with critics stressing that the government’s measures (such as abolishing large family benefits and raising taxes) are counterproductive. Fierce criticism is also leveled against the procedural correctness of public administration and the political appointment of high-ranking officials. The political focus is thus both value-driven (supporting families) and procedural (adherence to the rule of law).
2024-10-09
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth Session, Plenary Session.
The political stance is cautious and policy-driven, primarily focused on preserving the quality and accessibility of social services, especially given the current constraints on state finances. The speaker expresses strong skepticism toward the draft legislation, particularly because it employs the word "flexibility," fearing that this term is being used to mask service cutbacks or reductions. Furthermore, they are demanding strict financial transparency and precision regarding the costs associated with the proposed bill.
2024-10-09
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, information briefing
The political focus is on national security and foreign policy, particularly regarding the possible deployment of Estonian soldiers to Western Ukraine for a training mission. The speaker demands strong transparency and accountability from the government, emphasizing that members of the Riigikogu and the Estonian people must be aware of these weighty decisions. This position is strongly aimed at scrutinizing the government's actions and ensuring the topic is discussed publicly.
2024-10-08
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The political stance is skeptical and outcome-oriented, focusing on the practical implications of administrative changes (such as contract duration and the division of labor between agencies). Emphasis is placed on the necessity of avoiding uncertainty in laboratory operations, and there is doubt regarding the true effectiveness of bureaucracy reduction if the ministry's budget remains static while the budget of the Health Board increases.
2024-10-07
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
The political stance is strongly critical of the government's infrastructure funding and prioritization, especially concerning the reduction of road maintenance funds. Emphasis is placed on the necessity of fulfilling commitments made to Europe (Via Baltica 2030), and the expediency and realistic completion of the Rail Baltic project are called into question. The position is results-oriented, focusing on budgetary inconsistencies and the risks associated with failing to meet obligations.
2024-09-25
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
The speaker positions himself/herself as a fierce opponent of the coalition's energy policy—which relies on subsidizing wind and solar power—instead strongly advocating for the use of nuclear energy and oil shale as a means of saving the economy. In the social sphere, the speaker is strictly opposed to the legal definition of "social gender" (gender identity), stressing that the constitution must be grounded in biological sex. Their views are strongly value-based concerning social questions and outcome-based regarding economic and energy questions.
2024-09-24
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary sitting
The political stance is strongly opposed to unreasonable administrative burdens and excessive flexibility concerning pension inheritance matters. Furthermore, the speaker sharply criticizes the government's actions, which may appear hostile toward entrepreneurs (citing accusations of tax fraud), and demands complete transparency in the introduction of draft legislation, accusing the minister of concealing crucial amendments.
2024-09-18
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session
The political stance involves strong opposition to the preferential development and subsidization of renewable energy, arguing that these measures result in high prices, issues with supply security, and market distortions. The party advocates for stable energy sources (nuclear, gas, oil shale), but stresses that the current subsidy scheme impedes the advancement of nuclear power. The overall approach is heavily policy- and performance-driven, focusing specifically on costs and energy security.
2024-09-16
The 15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting.
The political position is strongly opposed to the government's tax policy, particularly concerning the progressive income tax and regressive taxes, which are claimed to disproportionately affect the poor. The text stresses the hypocrisy of the Social Democrats (SDE) on the issue of helping the poor and rejects the narrative of class hatred. The political framework is value-based, underscoring the contradiction between their actions and their rhetoric.
2024-09-11
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session
The political focus lies at the intersection of national defense and economic support, particularly concerning the readiness of drone manufacturers. The speaker offers measured criticism of the minister's policy, which fails to support local producers until a need actually arises, thereby calling into question the economic rationale behind the government's actions. The critique targets both the policy's effectiveness and its inherent internal contradiction.
2024-09-11
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, press briefing.
The political focus is centered on the legality of the confiscation of the historical monument and the protection of the memory of the soldiers who fought for Estonia's freedom. The speaker adopts a strongly oppositional stance toward the government's actions, emphasizing the violation of the principles of the rule of law and the danger of operating under the premise of "thought crime." This position is strongly value-based, centered on defending civil liberties and legal clarity.
2024-09-09
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The political position is strongly oppositional, focusing on the discrepancies between the government's actions and its promises. The main issues are deficits in education funding during the period of cuts and restrictions imposed on private owners (specifically forest owners) for which fair compensation is not provided. Criticism is directed at the government's administrative capacity and budgetary policy, especially regarding unfunded mandates and the growth of bureaucracy.
2024-07-29
15th Riigikogu, Riigikogu extraordinary session.
The political focus is centered on the past activities of Minister (Vladimir Svet) concerning the commemorations held at the Bronze Soldier monument on May 9th and other dates. The speaker adopts a strongly critical and questioning stance, demanding clarity on whether the Minister participated in these events in a private or official capacity. The framework for posing these questions is value-based, focusing on scrutinizing the Minister's background and ideological alignment.
2024-07-29
The 15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu.
The political stance centers on the organization of work within the Riigikogu and the interpretation of procedural rules. The speaker questions the authority of the presiding officer to terminate debates, emphasizing the institutional framework. The position is procedural in nature, seeking clarity regarding the application of the rules.
2024-07-29
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The political position is strongly opposed to the coalition's cascade of taxes (car tax, VAT, income tax) and the raising of levies, viewing this as activity detrimental to the interests of the Estonian state and its people. Criticism is aimed both at the substance of the policy and the coalition's actions (the 'theater'), stressing that the primary objective for implementing these taxes is unclear and constantly shifting. The speaker calls upon other members of the Riigikogu to vote against these tax increases, urging them to follow their conscience.
2024-07-22
15th Riigikogu, Riigikogu's extraordinary session.
The political position is strongly oppositional, focusing on performance-based criticism of the government (the decline in competitiveness, the poor budget). Emphasis is placed on the potential use of security issues as a cover to redirect funds toward meeting climate neutrality goals. The speaker is skeptical of the new coalition, viewing it as a continuation of the previous government.
2024-07-15
15th Riigikogu, Extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The political stance is strongly opposed to tax hikes, especially the car tax, stressing that new taxes are fundamentally wrong during an economic recession and are detrimental to the country. The framework is value-driven and results-oriented, accusing the coalition of either deliberate or foolish anti-state actions that make life harder for Estonian citizens and businesses. The speaker demands that the government show care for the people and cease imposing further burdens.
2024-06-12
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session.
The speaker's political focus is heavily centered on energy policy. They advocate for nuclear energy as the uncontested best solution while opposing the promotion of renewables (wind and solar power). Furthermore, the speaker stresses the need for efficiency in the actions of the government and the judicial system, criticizing drawn-out decision-making processes and demanding accountability for a lack of motivation. Their positions are strongly rooted in values (the energy preference) and results (the critique of bureaucracy).
2024-06-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The political stance is strongly opposed to the government's tax policy and fiscal management, particularly concerning the proposed car tax and general tax hikes. The criticism targets the government's untrustworthiness and its failure to uphold election promises, making this position primarily results-oriented and values-driven. The speaker stresses that EKRE has exhausted every avenue, both procedurally and politically, to prevent the car tax from being implemented.
2024-06-03
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary sitting.
The political focus is heavily centered on scrutinizing the government's activities and the accountability of ministers, particularly regarding the potential conflict of interest (Bolt) involving the ministry's senior management (the Deputy Secretary General). There is a strong emphasis on the necessity of political leadership, specifically questioning whether the minister issued clear instructions to prevent conflicts of interest. Furthermore, clarity is required concerning environmental regulations and the trustworthiness of information provided by public officials, pointing toward a robust, performance-driven approach.
2024-05-29
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The speaker is a prominent opposition politician who criticizes the government's direction in both social and energy policy. He opposes excessive state intervention in the lives of children and the growth of bureaucracy in the social sector. Furthermore, he advocates for a common-sense energy policy, supporting nuclear power while opposing subsidized wind and solar energy. His positions are strongly rooted in values (family rights versus state rights) and policy considerations (energy cost-effectiveness).
2024-05-28
15th Riigikogu, third session, plenary session
The political position is firmly in opposition to the government’s activities, focusing primarily on the irresponsible state budget, the increase in tax revenue at the expense of the less affluent, and the breaking of election promises (especially regarding the tax-exempt average pension). Furthermore, there is strong opposition to spending taxpayer money on accelerating the development of renewable energy (wind and solar parks). The position is strongly value-driven, emphasizing political dishonesty and systemic corruption.
2024-05-27
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary session
The political stance is strongly opposed to the government's green transition policy, which is deemed ideologically flawed and compared to slogans used for building communism. The primary priority emphasized is improving defense capabilities, recommending a pause on construction supported by "green-crazy" subsidies. The criticism is primarily value-based and performance-driven, focusing on the government's failure to address energy poverty and establish correct priorities.
2024-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The political position strongly focuses on the equal valuation of kindergarten teachers compared to school teachers, while criticizing the termination of linking nursery school teachers' salaries. Another key issue is youth mental health and a critique aimed at the excessive tendency to raise children "in cotton wool," stressing the importance of risk awareness. The speaker's approach is strongly value-driven, focusing on justice and fostering healthy life attitudes.
2024-05-13
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
The political focus is currently centered on questions regarding the integrity of government communication and political tactics, particularly concerning the sensitive issue of national security (Russian special services). The speaker criticizes the minister’s actions as a tactic designed purely for "scoring political points," involving the release of factually unsubstantiated claims into the media. The criticism is heavily aimed at the minister’s political conduct and the lack of concrete detail provided when addressing parliament.
2024-05-09
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The primary focus is on the trustworthiness and transparency of e-elections, expressing strong opposition to the current system and the legislative framework defending it. The political stance is value-based, emphasizing that the democratic system must be comprehensible even to citizens without specialized education. They also criticize setting convenience as the primary goal of democratic processes, pointing out that this has resulted in the coalition's failure to adhere to the laws.
2024-05-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session.
The political focus is directed at the integrity of the Riigikogu's work procedures and the consistent application of rules, criticizing the session chair for making decisions based on party affiliation. The substantive position is one of strong opposition to the banks' extraordinary profits, which arose due to central bank interest rate hikes, demanding that these profits be returned to society. The framework for these positions is predominantly procedural and policy-based.
2024-05-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The political position centers on strong opposition to the prime minister's alleged categorization of people and the destruction of national unity. The speaker criticizes the head of government for not wanting to be the "prime minister of the entire country," and demands accountability for statements characterizing residents of the counties. The focus is on the prime minister's unethical conduct and the government's performance.
2024-05-06
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
The most prominent themes are political accountability and the criteria for a minister remaining in office, with the speaker demanding that responsibility be taken in the event of major failures. The speaker adopts a strong values-based stance, opposing "gender-affirming" medical clinics and criticizing the Minister of Education's pseudoscientific views regarding the number of sexes. The focus involves criticizing both the government's performance and its values. The political position is strongly oppositional, casting doubt on the motives of the coalition (Eesti 200 and the Reform Party).
2024-04-30
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Third Session, Plenary Session.
The political stance is strongly oppositional, focusing on the government's broken promises and poor legislative practices. The most acute issues are the elimination of the income tax exemption for the average pension and the shifting of increased public sector costs onto the populace through fees and fines. The position is framed both in terms of moral values (keeping promises) and the failure of the government's actions. The speaker accuses the government of bankrupting the state and demands their resignation.
2024-04-29
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The political stance is firmly opposed to ideological climate policy, particularly when it threatens democratic institutions and economic stability. Emphasis is placed on the deliberation and stability inherent in democracy, and criticism is leveled at government dishonesty (lying before elections) and the usurpation of power. The speaker supports maintaining "common sense" in the role of central banks, standing against the exertion of pressure on the European Central Bank.
2024-04-18
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The political focus is on robust support for nuclear energy, emphasizing its safety and long-term economic viability. Concurrently, skepticism is voiced regarding the true costs of offshore wind farms and inadequate cost estimations (LCOE). The political framework is distinctly fact-based and technical, aiming to dispel demagogic associations between nuclear power and nuclear proliferation.
2024-04-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The speaker strongly opposes the Riigikogu's (Parliament's) organization of work and voting procedures, criticizing the government's alleged desire to set precedents despite assurances to the contrary. This position is aimed at criticizing the effective functioning of the parliament, stressing that the current conduct leads to the disregard of the opposition. This is a strongly procedural stance rooted in the criticism of institutional performance.
2024-04-16
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The speaker expresses strong opposition to government intervention in the energy market (specifically, regulating the universal service), labeling it "socialist-style governance." The political focus is directed towards ensuring national trust and security, particularly concerning standards for e-elections and identity verification, demanding a more consistent and stricter approach. He also sharply criticizes the Reform Party's internal processes and their choice of lead candidate for the European Parliament elections, citing their positions regarding Russia.
2024-04-15
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary session
The political focus is on road safety and maintenance, driven by concerns regarding government actions and budget cuts. The speaker expresses strong opposition to reducing road maintenance funding and questions the safety of the Transport Agency's "innovative" construction solutions (e.g., narrow intersections). This position is performance-based, demanding accountability from the minister and the measurement of activity results.
2024-04-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The political focus centers on sharp opposition to the government's budget priorities, particularly the funding of the green transition to the tune of hundreds of millions, which is widely viewed as absurd and simply throwing money down the drain. The utmost importance is placed on supporting children and families with children, and ensuring teachers' salaries, prioritizing these over green energy initiatives given the constraints of limited resources. A strong value-based stance is maintained, emphasizing the protection of children from social gender concepts imported from America. The overall political position is strongly oppositional and forceful.
2024-04-04
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The political stance centers on the working procedures of the Riigikogu and established parliamentary traditions. The speaker raises the issue of allocating the position of the second vice-speaker to the largest opposition party, seeking confirmation of this specific convention. The context in which the question is posed is primarily procedural and oriented toward historical practices.
2024-04-03
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The political focus is on the legislative process and its current gridlock due to a large volume of amendments, with direct reference to the proposed car tax bill. The speaker expresses doubt as to whether the stalling of bills constitutes a general procedural principle, and hopes that the car tax will ultimately fail to move forward through the process. Furthermore, criticism is leveled at the removal of points from the draft legislation that had not previously raised any issues, suggesting concern over the transparency of the procedure.
2024-04-03
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The political platform strongly emphasizes national security and energy policy resilience, opposing the dismantling of the Estonian Power Plant unit as dangerous self-undermining. Furthermore, the handling of the bank tax bill is demanded, and the government's legal justifications for controlling mobilization-age individuals at the border are disputed. The political framework is primarily centered on policy and risk management.
2024-03-20
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The political position is strongly critical of the continuation of the e-voting system, citing low public trust and the "wall" formed by officials and politicians who defend the system. Furthermore, when discussing draft legislation, the focus is on practical economic consequences, specifically asking what will become more expensive or easier for ordinary people and businesses. These standpoints are primarily framed through the lens of government performance effectiveness and public confidence.
2024-03-20
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, press briefing.
The speaker strongly emphasizes the very essence of the Estonian state, which is the preservation of national culture, language, and culture in a wider sense. He expresses strong opposition to the government’s economic policy and the climate minister’s energy plans, which he believes will lead to Estonia’s impoverishment. Additionally, he champions the freedom of parliamentary debate and the right of deputies to ask questions, criticizing the interference of the session chair.
2024-03-19
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The political stance centers on the efficiency of state governance and administration. The speaker voices concern that discussions could drag on, stressing the necessity of quickly moving toward concrete decisions and actions. This position is distinctly results-oriented and stands in opposition to bureaucratic inertia.
2024-03-18
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The political stance centers on criticizing the work of the justice system and the Prosecutor’s Office, specifically questioning the timing and motives behind initiating misdemeanor proceedings, thereby suggesting potential political bias. The speaker demands transparency and accountability from state agencies, primarily utilizing an institutional performance assessment framework.
2024-03-12
15th Riigikogu, 3rd plenary sitting
The political stance is fiercely opposed to European technocrats and centralized power, emphasizing the necessity of popular will and direct democracy. It supports referendums as a tool to prevent widespread street protests. It demands government accountability and the closing of legislative loopholes concerning security controls, citing the case of Prime Minister Kaja Kallas, which resulted in "great indignation" among the public.
2024-03-11
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
The political position is strongly oppositional, focusing on resistance to the government's tax increases, especially the car tax, which is seen as a burden on rural residents and families with children. These views are deeply value-based, broadly opposing the ideological aims of the green transition, which are considered restrictive of private property and prosperity. Furthermore, the actions of the Riigikogu Board are criticized for limiting the rights of deputies and disregarding procedural rules.
2024-03-07
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third sitting, plenary session
The political focus centers on Estonia’s competitiveness and energy policy, delivering a strong critique of the government’s current direction. The speaker vigorously supports securing dispatchable capacities (nuclear energy and oil shale) and opposes prioritizing the development of weather-dependent energy sources. The political framework is clearly results-oriented, stressing investment certainty and sound economic logic. He criticizes the government’s reasoning—that consumption should be created first, and only then should energy be produced to meet it—calling this an upside-down narrative.
2024-03-06
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The political focus is on long-term responsibility and the transparency of financial mechanisms, particularly in ensuring the end-of-life obligations for renewable energy, which should be comparable to the obligations of the fossil fuel and nuclear energy sectors. Concern is expressed that wind and solar energy receive subsidies, while other sectors contribute immediately to waste management. Also important are avoiding reputational damage to the state (aviation) and the financial sustainability of the Health Insurance Fund. The political framework is strongly policy-driven and focuses on ensuring performance in the long term.
2024-03-06
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, press briefing
The most salient topic is energy policy, where the speaker sharply criticizes the emphasis on renewable energy, which, in his assessment, is driving up costs. He demands that the government provide a concrete goal and vision for Estonian electricity prices relative to Finland over a ten-year perspective. His framework is policy- and results-based, stressing the importance of dispatchable capacity and citing the success of French nuclear power. The political stance is strongly opposed to the government's current direction.
2024-03-05
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The speaker is vehemently opposed to the government's energy policy, particularly the prioritization of wind and solar energy development, deeming it the wrong path. They are a strong advocate for nuclear power, seeing it as the only solution for ensuring energy security and industrial development. The political stance is framed by concerns over security, economic viability, and a critical view regarding the government's fulfillment of its international obligations (e.g., its failure to join the nuclear declaration).
2024-03-04
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The political focus centers on sharp criticism of the government's economic policy and opposition to tax hikes. The speaker strongly supports the temporary bank tax proposed by EKRE on extraordinary profits, viewing it as a necessary measure during these difficult times. Simultaneously, there is opposition to new taxes that disproportionately affect families with children and rural residents, such as the proposed car tax and the elimination of the income tax exemption. The political framework is heavily performance-driven, highlighting the government's failure to manage the current economic hardships.
2024-02-22
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
The speaker strongly stresses the importance of a clearly defined political worldview and ideological integrity in politics. The central conflict is framed as a struggle between promoting entrepreneurship and supporting economic growth versus socialist redistribution. This political stance is clearly value-based, demanding that politicians honestly articulate their ideological path.
2024-02-21
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The political position is strongly value-driven and oppositional, focusing on supporting economic growth and entrepreneurship. Emphasis is placed on the positive role of profit as a guarantor of investment capacity, while criticizing the stance of the government (the Social Democrats and the Prime Minister), which views profit negatively. Sharp questions are also raised regarding concessions on political values made in the pursuit of votes, referencing the answer given to Moonika Helme.
2024-01-25
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The speaker strongly supports the draft bill, which would streamline the permitting process for geological surveys in order to boost Estonia's competitiveness and increase national wealth. He criticizes the ruling coalition and the officialdom for rejecting sensible legislation, citing political opposition and bureaucratic stalling. His framework is clearly policy- and results-driven, stressing the necessity of acting without fear to expand the nation's knowledge base.
2024-01-24
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The political platform focuses on improving economic competitiveness through the exploration of mineral resources, and supports direct tax cuts (excise duty on liquefied petroleum gas, the tax-exempt threshold for the use of a private vehicle). Strong emphasis is also placed on the constructive nature of the Riigikogu (Parliament) working procedures and the fair handling of opposition bills. These viewpoints are primarily policy- and results-based (competitiveness).
2024-01-23
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The political stance focuses on criticizing the government's economic policy, linking the 33.8% rise in the tax burden to the economic recession. The speaker questions Estonia's appeal (its "sexiness") by December, pointing out that taxes are increasing during an economic downturn. The framework is heavily focused on evaluating the government's actions and political outcomes.
2024-01-22
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The political stance is strongly opposed to the government's policies concerning building energy efficiency and the implementation of a car tax. The speaker views these measures as part of a broader "nudge" agenda that restricts private property and reduces the accessibility of housing and cars for young and less affluent people. This position is deeply value-driven, emphasizing the importance of responsible stewardship and the free use of property.
2024-01-16
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The speaker strongly supports removing controversial monuments from public spaces to put an end to the celebrations and general commotion ("trall") that take place around them. Also central to the focus are green transition objectives, such as material recycling and water reuse, with an emphasis on the necessity of avoiding excessive bureaucracy. The political framework is primarily policy- and value-driven, concentrating on the organization of public space and environmental sustainability.
2024-01-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
The speakers are expressing strong opposition to the government’s actions, focusing on its inability to solve the demographic crisis, the decline in economic competitiveness, and ongoing energy security issues. Criticism is also directed at the government’s lack of transparency (specifically the silence surrounding the Slava Ukraini case) and the prime minister’s dishonesty regarding campaign promises. The political position is strongly results-driven and critical.
2024-01-11
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The political focus is directed toward criticizing existing systems and ensuring the procedural correctness of legislative work. The speaker criticizes the healthcare system's tendency toward centralization (specifically in the context of home births) and stresses the necessity for committee rapporteurs to grasp the substantive intent of the draft legislation. They emphasize the importance of the Parliament Board's decision-making authority and effective inter-committee cooperation. The overall position is more value-driven (transparency, competence) than purely policy-driven.
2024-01-10
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The primary political stance is strong opposition to the VAT increase and a demand for lower taxes, proposing various rates (18%, 19%, 19.6%). This position is framed by highlighting the Reform Party's broken promise from 2009, thereby emphasizing their historical unreliability when it comes to forming tax policy. This constitutes a forceful opposition to the government's tax policy, rooted in both policy substance and performance track record.
2024-01-10
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The speaker strongly opposes the government's economic policies, focusing on the decline of Estonia's competitiveness and the rising debt burden. Particular emphasis is placed on the need to lower electricity prices to the Finnish level, while criticizing the results of the government's performance over the last three years. The political framework is clearly performance-based and demands concrete steps from the government to improve the economic situation.
2024-01-09
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The political position centers on defending the operational procedures of the Riigikogu against accusations, specifically denying any obstruction. However, the speaker offers moderate criticism of the Session Department's activities, stressing the necessity of verifying the presence of rapporteurs before the agenda is finalized. The framework of this position is clearly procedural and geared toward enhancing the efficiency of parliamentary work.
2024-01-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
The most important topics are the negative impacts of the green transition on the Estonian economy and energy security, as well as the significant drop in the media freedom index. The politician adopts a strongly confrontational stance, directly linking both the decline in media freedom and the failed energy policy to the actions of the ruling coalition. The political framework is clearly results-oriented and critical of the government’s performance.