By Plenary Sessions: Rain Epler
Total Sessions: 131
Fully Profiled: 131
2025-10-15
The 15th Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
The primary targets of criticism are the government as a whole, specifically Minister Sutt and the session chairman, Hussar. The criticism is both political (focusing on energy instability and the lowering of social standards) and personal/procedural (referencing Hussar's "ego project" and Sutt's "view from the helicopter"). The opposition is intense, demanding the withdrawal of the draft legislation and ruling out any compromise with the framework proposed by the government.
2025-10-15
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Information Hour
The primary criticism is leveled at the Prime Minister and their team, accusing them of having a "love affair with haphazard electricity developments" and failing to gather adequate expert information. Furthermore, he procedurally criticizes the Speaker of the Riigikogu, noting that the Speaker tends to respond with sharp disapproval or reproach when the questions are not to his liking. The criticism is primarily policy-based and procedural.
2025-10-13
15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The main opponents are the Social Democrats, who are sharply criticized for promoting high taxes (including a car tax and a property tax) and for pushing misconceptions ("buying yachts"). The government is also criticized for reversing proposed legislation and employing pre-election stunts, as well as for handing over excessive control to the technocrats of the European Commission.
2025-10-08
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The speaker is strongly opposed to the Reform Party, the Social Democrats, and Eesti 200, accusing them of lying, hypocrisy, and failing to grasp the objectives of the Estonian state. The criticism is both political (the budget, the green transition) and personal/procedural (politicians hiding behind electoral alliances, absences from votes, and Läänemets’ pay raise). The speaker employs extreme rhetoric to underscore the moral and political unsuitability of their opponents to hold the reins of government.
2025-10-07
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The primary conflict is directed against the Minister of Finance and the government’s overall economic management. The criticism targets both specific budgetary decisions and the minister's attempts to criticize independent economic analysts (the Institute of Economic Research) and the business community. The intensity of the criticism is high, demanding concrete examples of the minister's actions.
2025-09-22
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
The opposition is extremely intense and is directed at the Reform Party, the Social Democrats, and Eesti 200, who are accused of causing a crisis of democracy and moving towards totalitarianism. Criticism targets both the government's actions and ethical issues (lying, labeling critics as enemies). Compromise is ruled out, with calls for voters not to elect representatives of the governing parties.
2025-09-17
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting.
The main adversaries are the governing coalition, which is accused of incompetence and allowing a crisis of democracy to develop, and the bureaucracy/technocrats who are attempting to seize control of state governance. The opposition is intense and uncompromising, demanding that the coalition be consigned to the dustbin of history. Furthermore, he/she warns against letting the social democrats (SocDems) anywhere near power.
2025-09-10
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
The main confrontation involves ministers and members of the Reform Party, who are being criticized for their aggressive communication style and for concealing their personal opinions. Criticism is also aimed at the lack of political background and experience of party members (Hanno Pevkur), with him being labeled a "political broiler." The critique of the opponent's style is intense and personal.
2025-09-10
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, press briefing
The primary target is Minister of Defence Hanno Pevkur, who faces intense attacks both personally (allegations of lying and evasion) and procedurally (for failing to address shortcomings in internal control). The opposition is uncompromising, demanding the minister be removed from office. Additionally, earlier decisions concerning the funding of the border fence are also being criticized, with Mart and Martin Helme being named.
2025-09-09
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session.
The primary target is Minister Pevkur, who is being criticized for both political failures (concerning the state of reserves) and procedural shortcomings (the failure to establish internal controls). The criticism is intense and has reached a personal level, questioning the minister's independent leadership capacity and labeling him the Secretary-General’s puppet.
2025-09-08
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
Strong opposition is directed at the government and ministers, who are accused of abusing power and promoting the coalition at Riigikogu events. The criticism is both policy-based (concerning energy) and ideological, accusing the government of distorting the truth and employing "bastard language" (a reference to the reinterpretation of the Elering CEO’s statements). No willingness to compromise is evident; instead, the opposing side is called upon to abandon their political attachments.
2025-09-04
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The main targets of criticism are the Speaker of the Riigikogu, Lauri Hussar (facing accusations of repression, incompetence, and disregard for the law), as well as Climate Minister Yoko Alender and Kristen Michal. The criticism is directed both at the substance of the policy (road funding, restrictions on the green transition) and at procedural conduct (ministers' absence from committees, the fast-tracking of draft legislation). The confrontation is intense, and no willingness to compromise is evident, with the coalition being accused of pursuing "steamroller politics."
2025-06-19
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The main opponents are the Reform Party (Õnne Pillak, Andres Sutt) and the coalition members as a whole, who are accused of fast-tracking laws and failing to delve into their substance. The criticism is intense, accusing Pillak of outright lying and the coalition of behaving like a "flock of sheep." No willingness to compromise with the government is being shown; instead, they are demanding a vote against the draft legislation.
2025-06-18
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Intense criticism has been leveled against the Social Democrats (Sotsid) and particularly Anti Allas, who is accused of contradictory voting on the car tax issue and personal hypocrisy (buying a jeep before the tax was implemented). The criticism targets both the political strategy and personal behavior, suggesting an underlying political-technological ulterior motive.
2025-06-17
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The main opponents are the government coalition (Reform Party, Social Democrats, Estonia 200) and the bill's presenter, Maris Lauri. The criticism is intense and substantive, accusing the opponents of lying, impoverishing the populace, and endangering democracy. The opposition is absolute, as a proposal is being made on behalf of the faction to immediately terminate the bill's proceedings.
2025-06-16
XV Riigikogu, V Session, Plenary Sitting
The confrontation is aimed at the government and ministers, criticizing political objectives (ESG, renewable energy) and systemic inefficiencies. The criticism is both political (specifically, ignoring expert recommendations regarding the emergency response system) and personal, referencing the minister’s prior business activities. The speaker demands the disclosure of the cost and timeline figures required to fix these systems.
2025-06-04
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The primary criticism is leveled against the Reform Party and the coalition, accusing them of underestimating rural residents (labeling them "poorly informed") and burdening the populace with a bureaucratic yoke. The activities of the ERJK (Political Parties Financing Surveillance Committee) are sharply criticized, which is deemed politically biased and part of Liisa Oviir’s personal campaign. Irony and sarcasm are employed to highlight the contradictory behavior of the opponents.
2025-06-04
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing
The confrontation is aimed at the Prime Minister and the government, criticizing both their procedural conduct and their failure to ensure the timely completion of Rail Baltic. The intensity of the criticism is high, as the speaker issued a direct challenge to the Prime Minister by asking whether a Latvian Member of Parliament had lied about the project's status.
2025-05-21
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
The primary criticism targets the actions of the Reform Party and the government, accusing them of dishonesty (tax hikes, making temporary taxes permanent) and unsound economic decisions. Specifically, Andres Sutt, Kristo Vaga, Hanah Lahe, and Annely are singled out for criticism. On the foreign policy front, Ursula von der Leyen’s political opportunism regarding the green transition is also criticized.
2025-05-19
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
The primary opposition is leveled against the prime minister and the government, sharply criticizing their failure to act on the problems facing Southeast Estonia. The criticism is twofold: political (prioritizing modern technology over people) and procedural (refusing to answer questions and presenting irrelevant nationwide figures). The intensity of the confrontation is high, culminating in a direct demand for the prime minister to resign.
2025-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The main opponents are coalition politicians (the Reform Party) and officials from the Ministry of Climate, who are accused of ideological rigidity and ignoring the state's interests. The criticism is intense and often personal (including accusations of lying), particularly concerning energy and environmental policy. He/She also criticizes the government's duplicity in implementing quotas.
2025-05-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.
The main confrontation is directed at the governing coalition and specific ministers, who are being criticized for weak political leadership, partisan regional policy, and ideological pressure. The criticism is intense and includes direct accusations of demagoguery, as well as calls for the minister's resignation. The Social Democrats' (Sotsid) understanding of cooperation, which is based on adherence to the party line and personal connections, is also being criticized.
2025-05-07
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The main opponents are the Reform Party and the Social Democrats, who are accused of negligence, incompetence, and partisan influence (Utilitas Wind/Sotsid). Criticism is directed both against the policy itself (the green transition) and the procedures used (shoddy work, rushing). It also criticizes opposition partners (Isamaa, Centre Party) for partially supporting the green policy.
2025-04-24
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker sharply opposes the policies of the government and the coalition, accusing them of inefficiency, ignoring facts, and catering to narrow (lobby) interests. Specific criticism is leveled at Kristen Michal for employing "number magic" and at Kaja Kallas for an ineffective export plan. The speaker also criticizes the dismissal of officials who exposed inconsistencies, and warns against energy entrepreneurs "skimming the cream."
2025-04-23
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The main opponents are the Social Democrats, who are accused of repeating a "mantra" and denying poor decisions made while in the coalition, as well as the Reform Party, who face accusations of misleading voters regarding oil shale and engaging in political-technological obfuscation. Criticism is also aimed at former officials who established legislative frameworks that allowed businesses to exploit loopholes.
2025-04-23
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing
The main confrontation is directed against the Reform Party and Prime Minister Michal, criticizing their political arrogance and unstable governance. Secondary criticism is aimed at Eesti 200 as a weak and exploited coalition partner. Thirdly, the presiding officer of the session is criticized for violating procedural rules and for partiality.
2025-04-17
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The main opponents are the Reform Party and the government coalition as a whole (including the Social Democrats and Eesti 200). Criticism is aimed both at policy (economic deterioration, wasteful spending) and at the personal level (the finance minister’s incompetence, the prime minister’s focus on Brussels). It accuses the coalition of arrogance and employing the "steamroller" tactic, which results in the complete rejection of opposition initiatives.
2025-04-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The primary criticism is aimed at the Prime Minister and the government’s actions, particularly concerning the reliance on European Union directives. The criticism is intense, addressing both the leadership style and the economic repercussions of energy policy, with the government being accused of impoverishing the country.
2025-04-09
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The primary opponents are the Reform Party, the Social Democrats, and Eesti 200, who are criticized for implementing the car tax and allowing excessive profiteering within the banking sector. The criticism is sharp and policy-focused, accusing them of hypocrisy and making poor decisions ahead of the elections. The coalition's inaction regarding a bank tax is linked to alleged secret agreements between Kaja Kallas, the prime minister at the time, and banking executives.
2025-04-09
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing
The primary target is the ruling coalition and the Speaker of the Parliament, who are sharply criticized for their procedural tactics ("steamroller politics"). The Minister is facing personal criticism due to accusations of demagoguery and hypocrisy, particularly regarding the criticism of US democracy. The criticism is intense and accusatory.
2025-04-08
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The main opponents are the Social Democrats (Sotsid/Socs), who stand accused of deliberate lying (Reili Rand) and incompetence concerning state finances (Anti Allas). The criticism spans both policy issues (the car tax, wind farms) and personal trustworthiness (lying), further highlighting the Socs' connection to the 2.6 billion wind farm project.
2025-03-24
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session.
The main adversary is the Reform Party and its representatives (including the Prime Minister and Mario Kadastik), who face criticism on both political and ethical grounds. The opponents are accused of knowingly speaking untruths, presenting ideological talking points, and being unwilling to establish a planned economy aimed at a narrow circle. The criticism is intense and includes accusations of favoring socialist methods.
2025-03-19
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing.
The main adversary is the Prime Minister, who is sharply criticized for instability, a lack of vision, and engaging in political maneuvering. The criticism is both political (citing tax increases and a failure to implement necessary cuts) and personal, casting doubt on the Prime Minister's trustworthiness and consistency.
2025-03-18
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fifth sitting, plenary session
The backlash is intense and targets the governing party's very existential legitimacy, asserting that the party no longer represents the public's views and is politically declining. The criticism is both political (focusing on simplification and bureaucracy) and personal, accusing opponents of prioritizing their personal welfare over national interests. The Social Democrats are also viewed as heading down the same path toward political obsolescence.
2025-03-17
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The main opponents are the Reform Party and the Prime Minister, who stands accused of lying to secure the office and of damaging Estonia. Criticism is also directed at the Social Democrats and Eesti 200; the latter is being labeled ineffective and a money pit. The attacks are intense, covering both political decisions (such as the car tax) and ethical issues.
2025-02-27
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The primary opponents are the Reform Party and the liberals, who face fierce criticism regarding their undemocratic tactics, falsehoods (tax hikes), and incompetent energy policy. The criticism is intense, spanning from major political issues (the cancellation of the 2.6 billion scheme) to direct challenges to personal competence (Igor Taro). There is no apparent willingness to seek a compromise.
2025-02-25
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The primary adversary is the governing coalition ("our good coalition partners"), who are sharply criticized for the expansion of voting rights and unreasonable legislative initiatives. The criticism is intense and is getting personal, accusing the coalition of being in a political "hangover" and warning of a bad outcome.
2025-02-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The main targets are the Prime Minister and Interior Minister Läänemets, who are accused of lying, talking nonsense, and making decisions detrimental to the state. The criticism is intense and covers both political aspects (business dealings with Russia, the budget, energy policy) and ethical aspects (a whiff of corruption, baseless accusations against allies). There is no willingness to compromise; direct accountability is being demanded.
2025-02-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The main opponents are members of the government, especially Interior Minister Läänemets, whose suitability for the post he sharply questions due to rhetoric attacking allies, calling him a "putinist." He also criticizes the hypocrisy of the "liberals" and their previous stances regarding the US administration (Mihkelson, Kaljulaid). The criticism is intense and focuses on the competence of the ministers and the damaging of allied relations.
2025-01-29
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th sitting, information briefing
Strong opposition is aimed at key government officials: Foreign Minister Tsahkna (due to a calendar conflict and one-sided reporting), Finance Minister Ligi (for ridiculing Trump and the Prime Minister), and Kaja Kallas (for her "outcry" regarding the Greenland issue). The criticism targets both diplomatic failures and the government's communication strategy, which allegedly harms allied relations.
2025-01-28
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The criticism is directed at the government (the minister), focusing on the risks associated with policy implementation and the abuse of the system (e.g., student visas acting as an "immigration pump"). The criticism is substantive and based on specific questions, demanding an overview of the scale of the abuse, but it is neither personal nor hostile.
2025-01-27
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The main criticism is aimed at the presiding officer, whose decisions regarding the procedure for conducting the session are considered arbitrary and inconsistent. Substantively, there is opposition to the government representative’s positions on the topic of social gender, with critics arguing that this approach serves to silence dissenters.
2025-01-22
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session.
The primary targets of criticism are the Reform Party and the Social Democrats, who stand accused of stifling the economy and squandering public funds. The Social Democrats, in particular, face intense criticism for their hypocrisy, as they publicly oppose taxes on social media while consistently voting in favor alongside the coalition. The criticism is leveled on both political and ethical grounds.
2025-01-22
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing
The main criticism is directed at the governing coalition, especially the Social Democrats, who are accused of blindly following the Reform Party's policies and playing the role of an ineffective "internal opposition." The criticism is intense and procedural, accusing the government of deliberately avoiding action and wasting time on analyses. The speaker questions the wisdom of the government leadership, citing a quote from the prime minister.
2025-01-21
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The primary opposition is aimed at the policies of the government and its agencies (PRIA, the Labour Inspectorate), which are increasing bureaucracy and demonstrating a lack of trust in farmers. Criticism is also leveled against European Union regulations—referred to as "absurdities"—and Reform Party politicians who claim they are reducing bureaucracy but are actually increasing it. The speaker also criticizes farmers' representative organizations, suggesting they may be state-dependent and therefore do not fully represent the interests of farmers.
2025-01-20
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The primary adversaries are the ruling coalition and the Reform Party, who stand accused of poor governance and deceiving voters regarding tax hikes. The criticism is intense, focusing on the government's failed economic and energy policies, as well as the distortion of social values. They show no willingness to compromise, promising instead to overturn the decisions made by the current government.
2025-01-15
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing
The main criticism is aimed at the government's activities, particularly the Social Democrats, whom he views as an impediment to the country's development, and he recommends their removal from the coalition. He sharply criticizes the lack of transparency regarding the Nordica report and suspects political impropriety in the appointment of officials (Kasemets), directly asking who is actually in charge of whom. He also criticizes developers who sue democratically elected local municipal councils.
2025-01-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The criticism is directed against the government, whose resistance to greater transparency is viewed as technocratic and lacking substance. There is also opposition to the double standards that apply when auditing the expenses of Riigikogu members and high officials.
2025-01-13
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Strong opposition is directed at the Prime Minister and the Reform Party, criticizing their energy and tax policies, as well as weak political leadership. The criticism is both political (demonization of fossil fuels, forcing the green transition) and personal (the appointment of Michal’s friend Kasemets as Secretary of State). He accuses the Environmental Board of an emotional impulse, which led to Eesti Energia's rational decision to withdraw the plants from the market.
2024-12-16
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The primary criticism targets the government and the coalition, accusing them of drafting poor and rushed legislation. A separate point of criticism focuses on the minister's dismissive behavior toward the parliamentary party (specifically, the refusal to introduce the candidate for Prosecutor General), which undermines the trustworthiness of the institutions. The criticism is grounded in both policy and procedure.
2024-12-04
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
The primary targets are the ruling coalition and specific ministers/presenters (Tanel Kiik, Kristina Kallas). Criticism is aimed both at policy (excise tax hikes, budget shuffling) and procedures (the failure to review proposed amendments). The attacks are intense, offering no possibility of compromise, and calling for a change of government.
2024-12-03
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The disagreement centers on the specifics of the bill introduced by the minister. The criticism itself is rooted in policy and procedure, specifically focusing on the absence of earmarked guarantees. The intensity of the criticism is moderate, primarily demanding greater clarity.
2024-11-21
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session
The main opponents are scientists, activists, and politically influential business figures (e.g., Ragn-Sells) who support the climate consensus and are accused of profiting under the guise of environmental slogans. Coalition representatives (Igor Taro) are particularly sharply criticized for hypocrisy. The criticism is often directed at a personal level, calling into question the competence and motives of the opponents.
2024-11-20
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The opposition is aimed at the government coalition, particularly the Social Democrats, who are viewed as an obstacle to implementing the desired policy. The reasoning of the committee that rejected the bill is also being criticized, with demands for its justifications to be made public. The criticism is political and procedural, and it is intense.
2024-11-20
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, press briefing.
The main opposition is aimed at the Prime Minister and the government's policies, with particular criticism directed at the Minister of Social Protection for stripping stay-at-home mothers of their health insurance. The critique is policy-based, focusing on the unrealistic nature of the budget, the inefficient allocation of expenditures, and the poor management of strategic projects (Rail Baltic).
2024-11-13
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session.
The primary opponents are the coalition (the "Sunrise Government"), the Ministry of Finance, and the Finance Committee, all of whom are accused of budget opacity and avoiding oversight. The text sharply criticizes the government's motives, questioning whether PR staff must be kept on the payroll simply to explain the government's detrimental actions. Furthermore, it accuses ERR (Estonian Public Broadcasting) of engaging in propaganda instead of actual journalism.
2024-11-13
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, information briefing
The main confrontation is aimed at the ruling coalition, which is accused of setting the wrong course in both energy and social policy. The Social Democrats (Sotsid) face particular criticism for obstructing nuclear energy development, with critics pointing to an "opposition with a whiff of corruption." The criticism is intense and addresses both political choices and the government's integrity in its responses.
2024-11-11
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The main opponents are the governing coalition and specific ministers/colleagues (Jaak Aab, Urmas, Lomp), who are being criticized for political dishonesty and lack of integrity. The criticism is twofold: both personal (concerning the trustworthiness of the politicians) and political (focusing on tax hikes and the deficiencies of the social welfare reform). There is no apparent willingness to compromise; instead, the demand is for a change in policy and the reintroduction of restrictions.
2024-11-06
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The speaker, who is in the opposition, is criticizing the committee for rushing the rejection of the opposition's draft bill. They cast doubt on the sincerity of the Isamaa party (Mart/Kokk) concerning the abolition of the car tax, implying that their actions in the committee were contradictory. The criticism is aimed both at the content of the policy and at the procedural injustice.
2024-11-06
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, information briefing
The main opponent is the prime minister and the government, whose green transition policy is facing sharp criticism due to its economically unsound and unstable direction. The criticism is substantive, focusing on the core policy, and demands immediate policy change, not a compromise.
2024-11-05
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session
The main opponent is the Prime Minister and the government, who are criticized for unrealistic optimism, the use of slogans, and the lack of a serious long-term plan regarding energy issues. The criticism is aimed at the substance of the policy and the effectiveness of the government's actions.
2024-11-04
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The main confrontation is directed at the Reform Party-led government, which is accused of causing economic and social decline. Additionally, a former colleague (Jaak) is being criticized on a personal level, specifically for switching sides and demonstrating political untrustworthiness. The criticism is both policy-based and performance-based.
2024-10-23
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
The primary opponents are the government coalition and specific ministers who stand accused of pro-Russian sentiment, unethical conduct, and incivility, particularly toward their female colleagues. The criticism is intense, encompassing both political attacks (voting rights, the woke agenda) and personal and procedural attacks. Furthermore, the speaker criticizes the session's presiding officer for potential bias in the allocation of speaking times.
2024-10-23
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, information briefing
The main opponents are the government's renewable energy policy and specific ministers (Jürgen Ligi, Lauri Läänemets). Jürgen Ligi is criticized for his personal rudeness and unethical conduct, while Läänemets is criticized for avoiding the topic of red symbols and disseminating messages reminiscent of the rhetoric of the eastern neighbor. The criticism is intense and demands a clear reassessment of the ministers' suitability.
2024-10-22
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The main opponents are the ruling coalition (including former Prime Minister Kaja Kallas and Minister Jürgen Ligi) and the banking sector. Criticism is aimed both at political decisions (specifically, avoiding the bank tax) and ethical issues (the influence bankers hold over the government and the bias shown by experts). The coalition's stance on the bank tax is being directly labeled as demagoguery.
2024-10-21
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The primary target is the government, particularly Finance Minister Jürgen Ligi, who faces intense criticism on both personal and procedural grounds. Ligi stands accused of lying, contradicting himself, and refusing to apologize for personally insulting a colleague. Criticism is also aimed at specific government policies, such as the tax hike and the renting out of prison spaces, alongside the perception that the minister's responses lack substance.
2024-10-16
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The opposition is targeting the government and ministers, criticizing their incompetence (such as forgetting 69 million euros in the budget) and wasteful spending (Rail Baltic, NGOs, PR expenditures). The criticism is primarily political and procedural, accusing the coalition representative of populism. Furthermore, it challenges the ministers' authority to reallocate funds at their discretion.
2024-10-15
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
The main criticism is aimed at the government and the Reform Party, who are accused of making poor decisions that resulted in economic recession and inflation, as well as breaking their election promises. The criticism is both political (energy, taxes) and procedural (the presiding officer’s shaky adherence to "good practices") and even extends to matters of personal morality (the contradictions between the Finance Minister’s lifestyle and environmental philosophy).
2024-10-14
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
The primary opposition is directed at the government and the responsible minister, who stands accused of using rhetoric and avoiding direct questions. Criticism targets both political decisions (cuts, tax hikes) and ethical and procedural issues (such as changing the requirements for the State Secretary). The situation where a top official participates in coalition negotiations and subsequently laws are changed to allow them to take a new post is criticized particularly sharply, with critics labeling it a "banana republic" practice.
2024-10-09
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth Session, Plenary Session.
The opposition's stance is directed against the bill proposed by the government and the minister's responses. The criticism is policy-driven, alleging that services are being cut back under the guise of "flexibility" and demanding accountability for inaccurate financial data. The attacks are intense, but they focus on the substance of the policy, not the individuals involved.
2024-10-09
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, information briefing
The speaker is in opposition to the Minister of Defence, criticizing the government's potential lack of transparency when discussing crucial security decisions. The criticism targets the procedure and the concealment of these issues, demanding the disclosure of the content of the cabinet discussions.
2024-10-08
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The opposition is directed against the government’s administrative changes, criticizing the logic and financial justification behind the reorganization of work between the ministry and the Health Board. The criticism is policy-driven and focuses on the contradictions between the goals of reducing bureaucracy and the actual growth of the budget.
2024-10-07
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
The main criticism is directed at the minister (Svet) and the government, accusing them of contradictory budget decisions and vague planning. The criticism is policy- and results-based, specifically highlighting the reduction of road maintenance funds and the prioritization of Rail Baltic financing.
2024-09-25
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
The criticism is aimed directly at the coalition and the Prime Minister, accusing them of making poor decisions and worsening the economy. He/She criticizes the ministers for short-sightedness and for misleading the public regarding social definitions. The criticism is sharp and policy-based, claiming that the opposing side is unwilling to learn from the mistakes of Germany and Europe.
2024-09-24
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary sitting
The primary confrontation is directed at the minister and the ministry, criticizing the lack of transparency and the dishonest presentation of their draft legislation. The criticism is intense, accusing the minister of concealing significant changes and negatively branding tax-compliant entrepreneurs. The opposition is also extended to the chair of the session, who, in the speaker's assessment, failed to maintain order.
2024-09-18
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session
The main opposition is directed at officials within the Ministry of Climate (who are accused of inconsistencies) and coalition members of parliament, who are being criticized for the ineffectiveness of their policies and their lack of expertise. The criticism is particularly sharp towards colleague Kadastik, who stands accused of actively undermining the development of nuclear energy. The critique is both policy-based and personal, and there is a complete absence of willingness to compromise.
2024-09-16
The 15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting.
The primary opponents are the Social Democrats (SDE), Minister Läänemets, Minister Riisalo, and the Minister of Finance. The criticism is intense, centering on political hypocrisy, the implementation of regressive taxes, and the misleading of the public regarding taxation. The opponents are further accused of inciting class antagonism and branding those who raise questions as "state traitors."
2024-09-11
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session
The criticism is aimed at the Minister (or the government) and addresses the specific procurement policy for national defense. The opposition is policy-based, focusing on the policy's illogical nature and its failure to guarantee industrial readiness.
2024-09-11
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, press briefing.
The primary target is the Prime Minister and the government, who face criticism for misleading the public and for illegal actions during the confiscation of the monument. The criticism is intense, focusing specifically on procedural and legal shortcomings, particularly the misinterpretation of the law and the establishment of a dangerous precedent.
2024-09-09
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The opposition is directed at the government and the ministries, criticizing primarily administrative capacity and financial realism. The criticism is especially strong regarding the imposition of restrictions on private owners without compensation, and the growth of the bureaucratic apparatus in the education sector. The previous minister (Michal) and his path of building communism are also criticized.
2024-07-29
15th Riigikogu, Riigikogu extraordinary session.
The primary confrontation is aimed at Minister Svet, whose past activities concerning the Bronze Soldier monument are considered something that needs to be concealed. The criticism is also indirectly directed at the media, which is being urged to investigate the minister’s earlier actions, given that the minister himself was tight-lipped. Furthermore, the actions of the previous EKRE government are being criticized in the context of a "witch hunt."
2024-07-29
The 15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu.
The challenge is directed against the actions of the presiding officer and the statement he made from the rostrum concerning the termination of the debate. The criticism is purely procedural, seeking clarification regarding the limits of the chair's authority, referencing the individual (Lauri Hussar) within the context of the role.
2024-07-29
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The main opponents are the coalition parties (the Reform Party and the Social Democrats), who are criticized both for the substance of their policies and for procedural errors (fast-tracking legislation). The Social Democrats face particularly sharp criticism regarding the voting rights of Russian citizens and the promotion of hardcore Putinists, which is deemed hostile to the state. Opponents are accused of ignoring the financial well-being of families and remaining in power "in the name of completely incomprehensible interests."
2024-07-22
15th Riigikogu, Riigikogu's extraordinary session.
The main confrontation is directed at both the previous and the new coalition, who are accused of violating the principles of democracy and the rule of law, as well as interpreting legislation inconsistently. The criticism is intense and stems from both the breaking of prior promises (the pension levy) and the government’s poor performance and lack of transparency regarding the use of public funds.
2024-07-15
15th Riigikogu, Extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The confrontation is aimed at the governing coalition, which is sharply criticized for tax hikes, unfair legislation, and procedural limitations. The criticism is intense, ranging from policy-based arguments (the detrimental nature of the taxes) to personal and ethical attacks, accusing the coalition of either sheer incompetence or cynical actions against the public. Specifically, criticism is leveled at Toomas Uibo’s previous statements and colleague Terras’s capacity for understanding.
2024-06-12
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session.
The main criticism is aimed at proponents of renewable energy, whom he considers misleading or incompetent, as well as against the compromise proposals put forth by the Reform Party. He also criticizes the judiciary's delaying tactics and personally references colleagues Izmailova and Maran via a procedural matter. The criticism is intense and politically motivated.
2024-06-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The main opponents are the Reform Party, Prime Minister Kaja Kallas, and former Finance Minister Annely Akkermann. The criticism is intense, focusing on political dishonesty (lying to voters), budget management, and the violation of procedural norms regarding the bill. No willingness to compromise is being shown; instead, they are calling on coalition members of parliament to scrap the bill entirely.
2024-06-03
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary sitting.
The opposition is directed at the political leadership and accountability of the government (or the minister), criticizing their lack of awareness regarding the actions of top officials and the ambiguity surrounding the enforcement of regulations. There is a strong demand for clarification as to whether an official from the Ministry of Climate or the TTJA presented false information regarding the right to shut down websites.
2024-05-29
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The speaker leveled sharp criticism against the government coalition, accusing it of ignoring the decision to improve political culture and selectively adhering to procedural norms. The criticism is particularly harsh toward the Social Democrats, who are accused of serving the interests of lobby groups and engaging in hypocrisy (opposing nuclear subsidies while simultaneously supporting the subsidization of wind farms). He/She also criticized policies that lead to the "nationalization of children" and the expansion of bureaucracy.
2024-05-28
15th Riigikogu, third session, plenary session
The confrontation is aimed directly at the ruling government coalition (the Reform Party, the Social Democrats) and its leading members (Kaja Kallas, Jürgen Ligi, Annely Akkermann). The criticism is intense, focusing on political unethical behavior, the breaking of election promises, and systemic corruption (specifically, cronyism within the management/board).
2024-05-27
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary session
The opposition is intense and is aimed at the coalition and the ministers. The criticism is both political (an ideological disagreement concerning the green transition) and procedural (the coalition's low attendance in the chamber, and the minister's interruptions). The minister is also being questioned regarding the funding of covert campaigns and an apparent fear of engaging with investigations.
2024-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The speaker is in an opposition role, posing critical questions to the minister regarding both education and social policy topics. The criticism is directed at specific political decisions (the termination of the linkage requirements for nursery school teachers) and the government's approach to youth upbringing. The intensity of the opposition is moderate but substantive, demanding explanations concerning the consequences of the policy.
2024-05-13
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
The primary opposition is directed against the minister, whose political activities and communication tactics are being sharply criticized. The criticism is both tactical and ethical in nature, accusing the minister of disregarding facts and using the media to score political points.
2024-05-09
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
Strong criticism has been leveled against the defenders of the governing coalition and the e-voting system. The criticism targets both the political dimension (the prioritization of convenience) and the procedural level (the coalition is failing to adhere to the law). There is also mention of a "competing coalition party" which may bring in experts to confirm the system's validity, thereby highlighting the existing confrontation.
2024-05-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session.
A strong backlash is aimed at the session chair and the rapporteur, who are accused of applying procedural rules unfairly and with bias, particularly toward the opposition. Substantively, banks are sharply criticized for "excessive greed" related to their extraordinary profits. The criticism is both procedural and personal (e.g., insinuations regarding the presiding officer's lack of manliness).
2024-05-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The main opponent is the prime minister, who is being criticized for personal conduct and rhetoric that divides the country. The criticism is intense and demands that the prime minister disclose the alleged scale of county "evilness" so that people know "which category they fall into in the prime minister's eyes."
2024-05-06
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
The main opponents are the Minister of Education and the governing coalition, particularly Eesti 200 and the Reform Party, whose political alliance is viewed as serving the interests of the Reform Party. The criticism is intense, focusing both on the Minister's scientifically unfounded positions and their failure to assume political responsibility. The speaker questions the Minister's fitness for the position.
2024-04-30
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Third Session, Plenary Session.
The main opponent is the ruling coalition (Reform Party, Social Democrats, Estonia 200), which is criticized both for violating legislative norms and for breaking socio-political promises. The criticism is intense and ideological, accusing the government of exploiting the weakest members of society and channeling funds into ideological projects. Compromise has been ruled out, with a motion submitted to reject the bill and demand the collective resignation of the government.
2024-04-29
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The primary targets are Prime Minister Kaja Kallas, who faces personal attacks and accusations of dishonesty and malice, and the European Central Bank (ECB) along with its ideological policies. Criticism is also leveled at the President of the Bank of Estonia for his potential ignorance or passivity during international pressure attempts. The opposition is intense, and these policies are widely viewed as being "on a catastrophic course."
2024-04-18
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The opposition stance is directed against colleagues (Taro and Tali), who are being criticized for demagoguery and misleading the public by linking nuclear armament with nuclear energy. Furthermore, they oppose the unrealistic price calculations and methodologies (LCOE) of wind energy developers, highlighting the high actual costs and the necessity of state support.
2024-04-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The opposition's stance is robust, directed against the actions of the government or the governing bodies of the Riigikogu concerning the handling of draft legislation. The criticism is procedural, accusing the opposing side of setting precedents and disregarding the role of the opposition. The speaker points out that the government is attempting to accelerate the Riigikogu's work too rapidly, thereby marginalizing the opposition.
2024-04-16
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The main criticism is directed at the government and the Reform Party, accusing them of disproportionate market intervention and using unreliable election methods. The criticism is both policy-based and procedural, particularly concerning the ignoring of expert opinions during the legislative process. He labels the Reform Party's frontrunner a "Putinist," which constitutes an intense personalized attack stemming from foreign policy stances.
2024-04-15
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary session
The main criticism is directed at the activities of the Transport Administration (the safety and implementation of innovations) and against the Minister (budget cuts and lack of oversight). The leadership of the Riigikogu is also criticized for delaying the response to a query, citing procedural obstacles. The criticism is policy- and procedure-based.
2024-04-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The confrontation with the government is intense and widespread, criticizing both budget priorities and the fundamental values underpinning social policy. Ministers are directly accused of demagoguery, presenting false data, and squandering money under the slogans of the green transition. Criticism is also aimed at the actions of the presiding officer, who is accused of attempting to silence the opposition's voice.
2024-04-04
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
Insufficient information.
2024-04-03
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The speaker voices clear criticism regarding the government's legislative process, particularly concerning the car tax bill procedure grinding to a halt, and expresses hope that the bill will be stopped entirely. The criticism targets procedural decisions related to the management of amendments and the alteration of the draft legislation's content, including the removal of provisions that were considered uncontroversial.
2024-04-03
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The primary confrontation is directed against the inaction of the Prime Minister and the government (regarding the bank tax) and decisions that weaken national security. The criticism is policy- and procedure-centric, challenging the government’s legal explanations and protesting the Prime Minister’s interference in the organization of the Riigikogu’s work.
2024-03-20
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
Strong opposition is directed at the political and administrative system that defends the continuation of e-voting, a system represented by "judges, officials, and politicians," collectively referred to as "the wall." The criticism is systemic and directly questions whether change is possible regardless of public opinion. It also criticizes the presenter for either lacking an opinion or lacking the courage to express it.
2024-03-20
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, press briefing.
The main targets of criticism are the Chancellor and a department head at the Ministry of Climate, who are accused of lying to members of the Riigikogu and concealing funding information. Furthermore, he/she sharply criticizes the session chair for inappropriately intervening in and controlling the parliamentary debate. He/She is strongly opposed to the government’s economic and energy policies, which are impoverishing the country.
2024-03-19
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The criticism is aimed more at procedural inefficiency and indecisiveness in governing the country, rather than targeting specific political opponents. There is fear that the debates could drag on indefinitely, signaling dissatisfaction with the current pace of national governance.
2024-03-18
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Criticism is aimed at the working methods and potential political bias of the Prosecutor's Office, raising questions about the timing of the proceedings. A specific political opponent, Urmas Reinsalu (Isamaa), is singled out, with questions being raised about the sources of his knowledge and references made to his alleged fumbling.
2024-03-12
15th Riigikogu, 3rd plenary sitting
The main opposition is directed at the "European technocrats" who subordinate national governments, as well as the Estonian government itself. Criticism is aimed specifically at Prime Minister Kaja Kallas and the deficiencies in her security control, which stem from a legal loophole. The resistance is intense, suggesting that Kallas continuing in office caused great outrage among 80% of the Estonian population.
2024-03-11
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
The main criticism is aimed at the governing coalition and the prime minister, accusing them of implementing tax policies that make life difficult for rural residents and families. The Riigikogu board is also criticized for engaging in political retribution and restricting the rights of MPs when handling interpellations. Furthermore, the prime minister’s trustworthiness is being questioned regarding his explanations of political and media goals.
2024-03-07
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third sitting, plenary session
The opposition is aimed at the government and top politicians (Minister Michal, the Secretary General of the Ministry of Climate, a Socialist minister), who are being accused of incompetence, ignoring the reality hidden behind their slogans, and outright lying. The criticism is intense and focuses on political decisions that impede industrial investments and undermine competitiveness. The speaker also criticizes the bureaucratic hurdles resulting from these political decisions.
2024-03-06
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The criticism targets political shortcomings and unjust financial models, particularly the absence of a legal framework guaranteeing the utilization requirement for renewable energy. Concern is also raised regarding the "stripping bare" (or outright theft) of Estonia's national aviation sector and the ensuing damage to its reputation. Furthermore, it criticizes the potential risk of "optimizing" compensation within the sick leave system.
2024-03-06
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, press briefing
The main opponent is Prime Minister Kaja Kallas and the government’s energy policy. The criticism is sharp, focusing both on political choices (causing the high cost of living) and the Prime Minister’s rhetorical inconsistencies, the selection of sources, and alleged dishonesty in interpreting the transcript. There is no sign of a willingness to compromise; instead, the emphasis is placed on exposing the errors of the opposing side.
2024-03-05
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The primary criticism is leveled against the government and the minister, who favor wind and solar power, and against the media, who are accused of spreading negative narratives or outright lying. The criticism is policy- and substance-based, specifically concerning the lack of energy security and industrial development. The speaker rejects the colleague's suggestion that something (other than nuclear energy) should be done in the interim, and, on behalf of the faction, moves to reject the draft bill.
2024-03-04
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The primary opposition target is the ruling coalition and the prime minister, who face fierce criticism over political decisions (such as abandoning the bank tax and implementing new tax hikes) and ethical concerns (like the influence wielded by bank executives). The criticism is intense, accusing the government of strangling the Estonian economy and dipping into the pockets of families with children. While answers are expected, the government representative's responses are sometimes viewed as a deliberate refusal to engage with provocation.
2024-02-22
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
The main opponent is the Social Democratic Party (the SocDems), who are criticized for their economic philosophy (redistribution) and their incompetence regarding issues of economic growth. The criticism is highly intense and includes both political objections (minimum wage, progressive income tax) and severe personal attacks directed at the opponents' rhetoric.
2024-02-21
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The main opponents are the Social Democrats and the Prime Minister, who is being criticized for taking a stance that disparages economic profit in the context of tax cuts. The criticism is rooted in policy and values, and also questions the ethical foundation of political compromises made while trying to win votes.
2024-01-25
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The main adversaries are the officials and the coalition, who are being criticized for political opposition and bureaucratic obstruction. The criticism is intense, directly referencing the dishonesty of the officials ("they’re just making things up") and political retaliation in rejecting opposition bills. He suspects the bill is being rejected solely because it was initiated by the opposition.
2024-01-24
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The speaker's position is clearly oppositional, demanding constructive handling of the opposition's draft legislation from the government (or the minister) and the coalition. The criticism is aimed at the culture of procedure and procedural fairness, not at individuals.
2024-01-23
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The confrontation is directed at the government and the prime minister, whose tax policy is being criticized in the context of the economic downturn. The criticism is policy-based and focuses on the negative impact of the government's decisions on the country's economic attractiveness.
2024-01-22
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The main opponent is the Reform Party, which is being directly criticized for introducing the car tax bill and for policies that restrict residents' property rights. The criticism is intense and ideological, accusing the government of serving the interests of a narrow elite and "collecting poverty." The minister drew criticism because he failed to present an economic analysis, offering only his optimism instead.
2024-01-16
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The criticism focuses on the inadequate analysis of the draft legislation, especially concerning the ministry's assertion that the workload will not significantly increase due to the regulation on water reuse. The speaker also requests clarification regarding colleague Valdo Randpere's claims that he was prevented from speaking, emphasizing procedural fairness.
2024-01-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
The primary target is the Prime Minister and the government, who face criticism both for their political choices (immigration, economic recession, risks to defense capability) and for procedural and personal issues (unreliability, emotionless responses, and favoring party colleagues in the chamber). The intensity of the criticism is high, and the government's competence to lead the country is being called into question.
2024-01-11
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The opposition is primarily aimed at systemic inertia (the medical system's desire to route everything through its own channels) and the violation of parliamentary work procedures. [The speaker] criticizes colleague Pakosta for straying from the substance of the matter and pointedly asks whether the board's decisions are deemed inadequate. The criticism targets both procedural incompetence and substantive inaccuracy.
2024-01-10
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The main opponent is the Reform Party, which is being criticized for breaking its 2009 promise regarding the temporary nature of the value-added tax (VAT). The criticism is aimed both at political untrustworthiness and specific tax hikes. The speaker notes ironically that it would be difficult for the Reform Party to support the proposal, as doing so would set a precedent for them to actually fulfill a long-standing promise.
2024-01-10
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The primary adversary is the ruling coalition and the prime minister, whose actions are criticized for poor economic performance and increasing the national debt burden. The criticism is both substantive (a decline in competitiveness) and political, accusing the government of failures and ironically pointing to the blaming of Jüri Ratas as a method of evading responsibility.
2024-01-09
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The speaker is strongly refuting the accusations of obstruction, flatly denying any such activity. He personally criticizes Mr. Ligi, demanding that he remain silent, which suggests a sharp personal confrontation regarding parliamentary procedure.
2024-01-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
The criticism is aimed directly at the ruling coalition, which is accused of causing the decline of media freedom and making poor energy policy choices. The critique is based on policy and performance, asserting that the government is pursuing the wrong priorities under the banner of the green transition. The possibility of compromise is not mentioned; the focus remains on holding the government accountable.