Session Profile: Rain Epler
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session.
2024-05-08
Political Position
The political focus is directed at the integrity of the Riigikogu's work procedures and the consistent application of rules, criticizing the session chair for making decisions based on party affiliation. The substantive position is one of strong opposition to the banks' extraordinary profits, which arose due to central bank interest rate hikes, demanding that these profits be returned to society. The framework for these positions is predominantly procedural and policy-based.
8 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
Demonstrates detailed expertise regarding the procedural rules of the Riigikogu, precisely referencing the sections governing the linking of amendments (Section 102, Subsection 2). Furthermore, knowledge of macroeconomics is present, connecting bank profits to the rise in base interest rates of central banks (the US Federal Reserve).
8 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The speaker’s style is highly combative and blunt, employing strong accusatory language such as "travesty of justice" and hinting at the presiding officer’s "lack of manhood" when dealing with the heavy artillery. The focus is on logical argumentation concerning procedural rules, but this is delivered alongside emotionally charged criticism. Figurative language is also used, for example, referring to the bank tax as a "whip."
8 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker is highly active during the plenary session, repeatedly intervening both with procedural questions and in substantive debates (e.g., the bank tax). A pattern emerges where questions are posed immediately following the conclusion of the previous agenda item or in response to clarifications provided by the Chair, demonstrating careful and attentive engagement.
8 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
A strong backlash is aimed at the session chair and the rapporteur, who are accused of applying procedural rules unfairly and with bias, particularly toward the opposition. Substantively, banks are sharply criticized for "excessive greed" related to their extraordinary profits. The criticism is both procedural and personal (e.g., insinuations regarding the presiding officer's lack of manliness).
8 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
Cooperation is evident within the faction, referencing the jointly submitted draft bill concerning the bank tax. When engaging with debate partners (e.g., colleague Tamm), communication begins with partial agreement, but a strong counter-argument is subsequently presented. There are no references to cross-party cooperation.
8 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
Insufficient data.
8 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Strongly supports the regulation of windfall bank profits that have resulted from central bank interest rate hikes, rather than the bank’s own efforts. It views the bank tax as a potential whip that would force banks to raise deposit interest rates faster, prioritizing the interests of society over excessive profiteering. It opposes the view that the idea of a bank tax would penalize innovative entrepreneurs.
8 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Insufficient data.
8 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The primary legislative focus is directed at adhering to the Riigikogu's procedural rules, specifically regarding the procedure for grouping and voting on amendments. The previous priority was a bill introduced by the faction concerning banks' extraordinary profits and the bank tax.
8 Speeches Analyzed