Agenda Profile: Rain Epler
Inquiry regarding elementary school textbooks (no. 672)
2025-01-27
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Political Position
The political focus operates on two levels: demanding continuity in the procedural rules for conducting the Riigikogu session, and the critical treatment of social issues (social gender). The speaker expresses strong skepticism toward the narrative of scientific consensus, deeming it dangerous because it leads to the silencing of dissenters. The stance is value-based, emphasizing procedural transparency and resistance to ideological pressure.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
Demonstrates proficiency in the Riigikogu's rules of procedure and the regulations governing sessions, referencing prior decisions and established practices (the "yellow book"). Furthermore, they are knowledgeable about issues concerning social gender and discrimination, citing the International Labour Organization's charter and its practical implications (e.g., locker rooms).
3 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The style is direct, demanding, and challenging, especially towards the chair, forcefully demanding explanations regarding procedural changes. On substantive issues, the speaker adopts a cautionary and argumentative tone, viewing the emphasis on scientific consensus as dangerous. The speaker focuses on logical deduction and questioning to expose the consequences of the opposing side's positions.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker was highly active during the session, posing three consecutive questions. Two of these questions addressed the session's procedure, and one was a substantive inquiry directed at the minister. This demonstrates a focus both on procedural oversight and the swift introduction of key substantive topics.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The subject directly opposes the Chair, criticizing their procedural decisions regarding the order of the session as arbitrary and lacking a consistent line. Substantively, they oppose the government's (or minister's) approach to social gender and the emphasis placed on scientific consensus, viewing this as a dangerous mechanism for silencing dissent.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
Demonstrates readiness for swift and pragmatic cooperation with colleagues, referencing the exchange of views with Anti in order to resolve the procedural matter. It also references colleague Pakosta's previous work in defending the ILO charter, thereby showing awareness of the contributions made by other delegates.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
No data available.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
No data available
3 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Expresses deep concern over the expansion of the concept of social gender, asking the minister where this development is supposed to lead and how it impacts the prevention of discrimination. Sharply criticizes the use of "scientific consensus" when dealing with social issues (including climate), seeing in this a danger that skeptical scientists will lose funding and be silenced.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The main focus is on an interpellation regarding primary school textbooks, concentrating specifically on the social gender theme addressed in the textbooks and its ideological basis. An important priority is also ensuring the consistency of the procedures and rules for conducting Riigikogu sessions, acting as an advocate for adherence to procedural rules.
3 Speeches Analyzed